Forestlump
Well-Known Member
I'm not proud of what I spent my money on! it's a bloody waste tbh, I've suggested a system that I didn't buy, purely on design and working principle.From a pure intellectual level in this thread, @engineermike is likely light years ahead of most everyone in here regarding the review and understanding of data logs and mechanics that drive them.
I’d like to remind everyone else that it’s okay to be proud of what you spent your money on. But that doesn’t mean it’s the best thing out there.
If you want evidence of my intellectual competence, I'm an aircraft engineer, studded aeronautics and qualified as an engines airframe engineer. I studied combustion from external to gas turbines in the ministry of defence. As hobbies, I've raced Moto X and karts until 16 where I went in to mini stocks and classic thunder after. I've built my own engines since about 13.
I do my own work on all my cars/bikes including the Mustang so thick as mince really, I don't understand any mechanical principles especially reading data logs!
Once the weather turns better here, I will do a data log with VCM scanner, used it to remotely map the car when I fitted the charger. Not that I need to prove anything as the laws of physics are what they are.
And just to point out that superchargers were developed originally for Aircraft, mostly by the British, french and Germans. Then they got used for racing on Bentley blower's. A centrifugal supercharger was fitted to the merlin engine in the spitfire. Google it, you will see the rolls Royce merlin supercharger is an almost identical design to the vortech/ Paxton units. There's a very good reason the new Formula 1 cars have a centrifugal compressor electric turbo unit and not a twin screw/ roots style and it's not because they don't know what their doing.
Send McLaren your data log Engineermike, might be next year's winning car?
Sponsored
Last edited: