shogun32
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Feb 8, 2019
- Threads
- 89
- Messages
- 14,735
- Reaction score
- 12,257
- Location
- Northern VA
- First Name
- Matt
- Vehicle(s)
- '19 GT/PP, '23 GB Mach1, '12 Audi S5 (v8+6mt)
- Vehicle Showcase
- 2
let them build EV-F150 you mean. 150,000 units (projected capacity) in it's 1st year.Let them stick to manufacturing cars.
Mustang is almost entirely irrelevant to the bottom line. I'll bet the C-Suite keeps bringing up the argument for just nuking the Mustang (car) since it's a cost center and lousy margins comparatively and would be dead and gone if not for Union contracts with the facility and there's not a whole lot Flint could make without a complete re-tool. So they just let the Mustang 'coast' on inertia till the numbers get so low it dies into irrelevancy. That's no doubt why it was pivoted to a 'brand'. That way you can shove all sorts of nonsense thru the tag.
I frankly wonder if the S650 will even materialize. I think Ford management is hoping the slide of Mustang into irrelevancy is on terminal glidepath and if they release anything it'll be an 'EV-lite' of the S550. Honestly I'm surprised the Maverick truck was NOT released as a Mustang-branded item.
Sponsored
Last edited: