Norm Peterson
corner barstool sitter
Of course. But the car it claims to be the current iteration of was not, and neither one has any 'sports car DNA' in it.Norm, if you're talking about the new Chargers, they're 4 doors, you know that.
Sorry, but the definition of a sports car was firmly established in this country during the 1950's and 1960's, and there were no regional (continental?) differences like you're trying to imply. The main reason you're thinking it's a European definition is because there were no nimble 2-seaters built as regular production by a major mfr in North America.You guys know what I mean. I'm from goddamn 'Merica, and I don't cotton to the European definition of a sports car...which is what? Something with 2 seats and a four-banger?
Sports cars were never about power and straight line acceleration; that was for hot rods and drag race cars with little or no crossover until about the time some guy named Shelby started dropping SBF's into the AC Ace chassis and called them Cobras.
I'm pretty sure that there was a time when the 911 was specifically defined as NOT being a sports car for racing classification purposes, mainly because of that rear seating. There was even considerable argument over whether the Corvette was a true "sports car" or not.A 911 has rear seats...so there's that.
But we sure do agree on this point. Next :cheers: round's on me, and if you can claim it by midnight there might just be a slice of b'day cake left.I have a hard time underatanding why someone would want a brutish, highly visceral car, but not want to row their own gears.
For me, it's the best part of waking up each day. :cheers:
Norm
Sponsored