Of course! It all adds up, no cats, 3" pipes vs 2.25 or 2.50 and bigger/longer header primaries. Plus the tune won't be bumping the safe guards as quickly and make it run more consistent. Drop in boost pressure, less heat, no cat protection etc.
That’s great info . My 18 GT /Gen 5 whipple /stock exhaust including cats made mid 800’s (SAE) with a 6 rib 3.5 pulley with race gas and a little less with the 3.625 pulley and E85 .
Yes they are STD so 802WHP in SAE would be what? 790? Believe me I'm skeptical as well. I've asked Rob Shoemaker what he thinks and he said that he has seen it, very rare though. I'm determined to figure it out myself. Like I said before, It's a place I'm very familiar with, this same dyno has been used for all of the tuning.This same dyno also had a Trackhawk on it and that did 588WHP SAE which seems accurate to me. It also had a 2019 ZR1 on there which did 688WHP STD which from what I've seen they are around 660 - 670whp SAE so I guess it's pretty accurate with everyone else except my car? Either way I will be going to another shop in the spring just to check what it reads there. Having the car running safe is more important then the dyno number. Rob knows what he is doing and 18* timing isn't unsafe but can't hurt to do some real road testing in the spring and try another dyno for reference
Just because I'm a stickler for numbers (accountant by trade) it'd be closer to 760-770 SAEYes they are STD so 802WHP in SAE would be what? 790? Believe me I'm skeptical as well. I've asked Rob Shoemaker what he thinks and he said that he has seen it, very rare though. I'm determined to figure it out myself. Like I said before, It's a place I'm very familiar with, this same dyno has been used for all of the tuning.This same dyno also had a Trackhawk on it and that did 588WHP SAE which seems accurate to me. It also had a 2019 ZR1 on there which did 688WHP STD which from what I've seen they are around 660 - 670whp SAE so I guess it's pretty accurate with everyone else except my car? Either way I will be going to another shop in the spring just to check what it reads there. Having the car running safe is more important then the dyno number. Rob knows what he is doing and 18* timing isn't unsafe but can't hurt to do some real road testing in the spring and try another dyno for reference
Lol...Hey, I'd still be very happy with those numbers. In my mind I just consider the car to be around the 750whp mark. I'll be tracking it this season so that will help answer some questions. I noticed that Fathouse Fabrications has one making 745whp with the same setup. Palm Beach did 737WHP with a Gen 2 Whipple on pump 93, LTH and 3.6. In that video the car made 646 on the 3.75 and long tubes. So on the stock Whipple calibration and no longtubes it made 631WHP, Gen 2 Whipple. With the longtubes on the Whipple tune it made 646WHP.With the longtubes and a PB Dyno tune the car made 713WHP and 515TQ and again on a Gen 2. So this car picked up 15whp with longtubes alone and 82WHP with just longtubes and a tune! At this point my car is on a Gen 3, 3.75 and no longtubes. With a PB Dyno tune I was at 709WHP and 544TQ. The Gen 2 car then adds a 3.6 pulley and is ran on the same tune setup and nets 737WHP and 537TQ. So this particular car has picked up 106 WHP on 93, on a GEN 2 with longtubes, 3.6 pulley and a tune. Pretty sweet. And Yes these are STD correction numbers. I went from 709WHP and 544TQ to 802WHP and 611TQ with a GEN 3, longtubes and 3.6. Almost the same exact gain but a little less. So I'll let SHONOFF15 fix this up for me. What's your conversion in SAE for these numbers. Stock whipple calibration = 681WHP...Tune = 709WHP...and you've already figured 760-770 SAE for my 802whp pull.
No worries man, and I do agree those are damn good numbers!Also I never noticed the link you provided before I asked you to convert the numbers...lol
Yeah it's Mustang Lifestyle...haha...And congrats on the setup man, you will love it! Keep us posted on your results! I'll post some times when Imake my runs!No worries man, and I do agree those are damn good numbers!
I have the same setup as the one PB did the dyno on that made 737 rwhp (mustanglifestyle I believe) gen 2 whipple, LT's, 3.625, PB tune (coming this spring) so I'm hoping to be around that number as well.
If you have the same setup with only the Gen 3 being the difference you should see 30-40 more so 730-740 + 30/40 puts you right around that 770 mark which falls in line with the SAE numbers.
But who cares right take that bisssssh to the track and see what she does!
22* on 13psi with 93 pump?! That is some scary shit.