Sponsored

The big Intercooler thread.

cstewartj

Well-Known Member
Joined
Jun 13, 2018
Threads
0
Messages
125
Reaction score
25
Location
GA
Vehicle(s)
2018 Mustang EcoBoost
Fortunately, an intercooler is a pretty simple device that is not highly stressed, i.e., you can see essentially what it's made of. I might be more concerned if I was buying internal engine components, such as pistons, rods, crank, etc. "Proof is in the pudding". If it allows me to maintain full boost longer, to slightly higher revs, it will be money well spent. I'll certainly post a follow up in May.
Agree that it is a rather simple device, but that doesn't mean cracked welds or cracked/swollen fin rows don't happen from eBay intercoolers and that comes from composition of the product - and people have documented instances of that in the forums, that's all. But I agree that for that price point it is difficult to argue against, for sure.
Sponsored

 

Vicr

Well-Known Member
Joined
Mar 8, 2018
Threads
47
Messages
523
Reaction score
337
Location
Fortuna Foothills, AZ
First Name
Vic
Vehicle(s)
2015 Mustang Ecoboost Premium
Cost aside, what is the best non race IC? I'll be in AZ in a year and will be tracking the car so heat soak is an issue.
 

MakStang

Well-Known Member
Joined
Dec 11, 2016
Threads
15
Messages
1,678
Reaction score
265
Location
Greece
Website
www.cellentis.uk
First Name
Makis
Vehicle(s)
A 2017 miraculous little beast
I like the cp-e DeltaCore. This is what I have on the car for the last two years. It does wonders with my setup (see my signature).
 

car_ter2903

Well-Known Member
Joined
Jan 11, 2016
Threads
2
Messages
63
Reaction score
24
Location
Coventry
First Name
Mike
Vehicle(s)
2015 2.3 Ecoboost
Hi guys, quick question as I couldn't find any answers scrolling through the previous posts' (so apologies if this has already been answered).

Has anyone installed an uprated intercooler (regardless of brand) with stock hot side/cold side piping? I'm wondering if I can get away with running a higher tune on stock pipe work or not? Trying to figure out if it's worth the extra ÂŁ225 or not...

Thanks for any advice you can give :thumbsup:
 

SVO MkII

Well-Known Member
Joined
Mar 1, 2018
Threads
35
Messages
643
Reaction score
284
Location
IL
Vehicle(s)
2018 Ecoboost, 6sp, PP, 2017 GT Convertible
Hi guys, quick question as I couldn't find any answers scrolling through the previous posts' (so apologies if this has already been answered).

Has anyone installed an uprated intercooler (regardless of brand) with stock hot side/cold side piping? I'm wondering if I can get away with running a higher tune on stock pipe work or not? Trying to figure out if it's worth the extra ÂŁ225 or not...

Thanks for any advice you can give :thumbsup:
I'm using all stock components except for the intercooler. I suspect this is probably what the majority of people who upgrade the IC are doing. If you do enough searching, you can find some dyno tests showing the improvement of an upgraded IC alone. As expected, it will essentially add a little power in the higher revs, above 4K to about 5.5K. Obviously, combine this with a tune, and you can get significantly higher increases.
 

Sponsored

car_ter2903

Well-Known Member
Joined
Jan 11, 2016
Threads
2
Messages
63
Reaction score
24
Location
Coventry
First Name
Mike
Vehicle(s)
2015 2.3 Ecoboost
I'm using all stock components except for the intercooler. I suspect this is probably what the majority of people who upgrade the IC are doing. If you do enough searching, you can find some dyno tests showing the improvement of an upgraded IC alone. As expected, it will essentially add a little power in the higher revs, above 4K to about 5.5K. Obviously, combine this with a tune, and you can get significantly higher increases.
Hey, thanks a lot for the feedback. I thought this may be the case, just wanted to check if anyone else had any experience of running this set-up before I took the plunge myself. Appreciate the advice :thumbsup:
 

Cardude99

Well-Known Member
Joined
Feb 14, 2016
Threads
69
Messages
2,473
Reaction score
1,060
Location
Phoenix, AZ
First Name
Sam
Vehicle(s)
2018 Ecoboost
Hi guys, quick question as I couldn't find any answers scrolling through the previous posts' (so apologies if this has already been answered).

Has anyone installed an uprated intercooler (regardless of brand) with stock hot side/cold side piping? I'm wondering if I can get away with running a higher tune on stock pipe work or not? Trying to figure out if it's worth the extra ÂŁ225 or not...

Thanks for any advice you can give :thumbsup:
I'm in your boat, unsure if it's needed or not. Intercooler is a must but the charge pipes I dunno. I am all for supporting mods but if there is no benefit then I will forgo them too. Hoping we can get some more information on this.
 

300mag

Well-Known Member
Joined
Sep 30, 2018
Threads
12
Messages
268
Reaction score
63
Location
Atlanta
First Name
Dave
Vehicle(s)
17 Ecoboost Prem Vert
I'm in your boat, unsure if it's needed or not. Intercooler is a must but the charge pipes I dunno. I am all for supporting mods but if there is no benefit then I will forgo them too. Hoping we can get some more information on this.
In my opinion I would go aftermarket if you go anything higher than a stage 1 tune. after that you wouldnt to chance the increased hp with the stock charge pipes and you would want to take advantage of the (slightly) lower charge temps.
 

cvf-jason

Well-Known Member
Gold Sponsor
Joined
May 15, 2018
Threads
19
Messages
303
Reaction score
103
Location
Miami
Website
www.cvfab.com
First Name
Jason
Vehicle(s)
2018 Ecoboost Mustang
Thanks for throwing this up - it's interesting to get an actual comparison with pics. If I'm not mistaken I'm seeing that the ETS has about 12 fins per inch and the cp-e 11 fins per inch. To be honest I expected the ETS to have a few more than that, but it compares pretty well to the cp-e.

I'm not really surprised that the cp-e has more space in between rows, though. More rows = better cooling, obviously, and some companies even try to market their adjustments to that as a benefit (think ATM and their "rounded header bars" talk - which I consider BS).

cp-e's end tanks are better (more flow) but ETS has a much larger cooling area, more fins per inch, and less space between rows. I'd personally trade off the cast end tanks for the larger cooling area of the ETS. The pricing helps too, as if I'm not wrong the cp-e in question is almost the same price. Everyone's got their opinion, though.

EDIT: Obligatory "We all have opinions, but IAT's don't lie" callout. Only on apples-to-apples comparisons, though.
Since we're talking fin packs, here's what we're working with on our units:

RCqd0tr.jpg


We're averaging about 20 fins per inch (2x as many as cp-e, and comparable to Garrett and at over half the price), high-flow cast end tanks, and an unbeatable price-point :muscle:. PM me for forum discounts!

https://www.cvfab.com/products/cvf-street-intercooler-2015-ford-mustang-ecoboost View attachment 343168
 

Attachments

  • 0 bytes Views: 0
Last edited:

solodogg

Well-Known Member
Joined
Sep 13, 2016
Threads
13
Messages
442
Reaction score
166
Location
Orlando
Vehicle(s)
2015 Mustang Ecoboost
Since we're talking fin packs, here's what we're working with on our units:

RCqd0tr.jpg


We're averaging about 20 fins per inch (2x as many as cp-e, and comparable to Garrett and at over half the price), high-flow cast end tanks, and an unbeatable price-point :muscle:. PM me for forum discounts!

https://www.cvfab.com/products/cvf-street-intercooler-2015-ford-mustang-ecoboost View attachment 343168
Man, I'd love to see IAT2 differences between the Mishimoto I currently have on the car and this one. If it performs as well as it looks, it would be a very good upgrade for hot climate vehicles.

I've always believed big IC's were bad for stock turbo due to too much pressure drop across the core, this one seems to have overcome the issue by packing more cooling capabilities into the smaller unit. Well done :)
 

Sponsored

SVO MkII

Well-Known Member
Joined
Mar 1, 2018
Threads
35
Messages
643
Reaction score
284
Location
IL
Vehicle(s)
2018 Ecoboost, 6sp, PP, 2017 GT Convertible
I've always believed big IC's were bad for stock turbo due to too much pressure drop across the core, this one seems to have overcome the issue by packing more cooling capabilities into the smaller unit. Well done :)
FWIW, I have not noticed any change whatsoever in throttle response with my larger (roughly 3 times larger than stock) IC. Totally stock motor in all other respects. As always, "your results may vary".
 

Blk18EcoPP1

Member
Joined
Jan 16, 2019
Threads
2
Messages
14
Reaction score
2
Location
ORLANDO, FLORIDA
First Name
Michael
Vehicle(s)
2018 Mustang Ecoboost PP1 (manual)
Hey guys just installed the ETS IC ... Looks great and performs great as well. Now time to start my tune plus data logging !
20190228_073936.jpg
 

5.0yote

AKA Bananana & 3.7Cyclone
Joined
Jul 18, 2015
Threads
29
Messages
619
Reaction score
148
Location
Mansfield, MA
Website
www.youtube.com
First Name
Don
Vehicle(s)
2016 Mustang Ecoboost Premium
Vehicle Showcase
1
As far as cold and hot side pipes go, there is little variance to using aftermarket charge pipes, add to that to be honest the plastic stock ones resist heat better IMO. Other than the bends etc maybe affecting some airflow, you are not increasing or decreasing the inlets on both ends on a stock turbo, so its a moot point unless you have an aftermarket turbo with a larger inlet, and larger TB as well. (however the hoses because lets face it the stockers are not pipes, will soften over time so a real charge pipe is better due to its rigidity and you will not need to worry about them collapsing). You should be fine to run the stock tubes on the aftermarket intercooler as that is the real workhorse of the setup anyway.

Other than that looks are really what you get with the aftermarket charge pipes more or less. There are only certain circumstances where they make a real difference over stock. None of them are if your running a stock turbo, or even a stock style drop in like the Precision/Turbonetics/Vagas, etc. You are still downsizing the pipe at the source.
 
Last edited:

5.0yote

AKA Bananana & 3.7Cyclone
Joined
Jul 18, 2015
Threads
29
Messages
619
Reaction score
148
Location
Mansfield, MA
Website
www.youtube.com
First Name
Don
Vehicle(s)
2016 Mustang Ecoboost Premium
Vehicle Showcase
1
Man, I'd love to see IAT2 differences between the Mishimoto I currently have on the car and this one. If it performs as well as it looks, it would be a very good upgrade for hot climate vehicles.

I've always believed big IC's were bad for stock turbo due to too much pressure drop across the core, this one seems to have overcome the issue by packing more cooling capabilities into the smaller unit. Well done :)
You can go too big of an intercooler in some situations, that being said I am pretty sure our turbos are so small stock that there would not be enough of a drop in pressure to affect the performance that much, I think it is pretty well balanced, and you can always tune that out either way to make up the difference on the back end. I think the overall benefits of a much larger intercooler could outweigh any loss of boost at the TB side of things with the quicker cooling recovery you get with more surface area. This leads to more consistent performance in a heat soak situation.

I was fine with the mishimoto in my stock configuration but found it lacking with the larger turbo application. I learned my lesson from the lost benefits during that trial and error situation and I went with the full size ETS as well for the drop in larger unit.
Sponsored

 
 




Top