MAGS1
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Mar 6, 2020
- Threads
- 95
- Messages
- 11,305
- Reaction score
- 18,529
- Location
- Somewhere in Middle America
- First Name
- Mark
- Vehicle(s)
- 2022 Mustang GT
Makes sense. However, I would assume that an increase in production costs would get passed along to the consumer. And one would expect that the owners of these cars would gladly pay a little extra for a proper filter that rectified a known prior issue vs paying $20-$25k for a replacement engine due to the failure of said filter. And if they’re using them in the GT500’s as well, you’ve got that many more vehicles to support, so it seems like there should be enough production scale there to keep costs reasonable.Why would Ford switch to this design? We can only guess. My guess is cost savings.
But I’m sure some accountant somewhere in Detroit is driving the decision like usual, not the guys/gals that engineered it.
Sponsored