Are you seriously now saying that the GM engines are better because it's harder to bolt on heads and a cam than it is to bolt on a blower? :lol:As far as a 'different engine'...if that's what you think, welcome to hot rodding, glad you could join us. External engine bolt ons don't take much skill or knowhow.
I don't know how to quote you an Poop. But he did say this is his last post:Are you seriously now saying that the GM engines are better because it's harder to bolt on heads and a cam than it is to bolt on a blower? :lol:
I do not see where he said that.Are you seriously now saying that the GM engines are better because it's harder to bolt on heads and a cam than it is to bolt on a blower? :lol:
Really? It was a comment about what 'hot rodding' is, and skills that are attained practicing the hobby. I think most would agree that doing a head/cam swap does require the use of one's critical thinking skills (an important quality that seems to be dwindling in modern society as a whole) more than bolting on a blower and taking it to a tuner.Are you seriously now saying that the GM engines are better because it's harder to bolt on heads and a cam than it is to bolt on a blower? :lol:
Not true, HP/liter started in 1994 (not with the S2000) with the B16a that was 1.6 liter pushing out 160 HP and the Honda that had it at the time was just as fast in a 0-60 and quarter then the Mustang GT with a V8 and 4.6 liters.
The only people not taking it seriously were those guys back then with really weak V8's that couldn't push 50/hp liter. Honda guys were asking them why their 4.8 liter V8's couldn't make 480 HP (and run 200,000K miles) and they really didn't have much to say accept "hp/liter is invalid neener neener neener... your momma wears combat boots".
Today its very much alive. The G350 has a V8 that now does 100 HP / liter and damn... That is awesome. You people still can't see the significance even 20 years later lol.
And no offense to Ford, but it’s pretty well established now that General Motors employs some of the best chassis engineers in the world. Their touch is felt in the new Camaro’s prodigious front-end grip, neutral balance at the limit, and outstanding wheel control over road imperfections whether or not Magnetic Ride Control adaptive dampers are present.
Its all about who funds the mags the most. Always has been. The clear winner by far for all mags like C&D, MT, R&T etc is chevy. :lol:Jeez..knock on Ford from C&D
So now HP per liter wins race's? Compare bolt on vs bolt on. Break down the price and power.Hp per liter the coyote dominates the lt. Shit for the price of the stuff needed to make tha power on a lt you could buy a supercharger. But hey, it's just heads, cams, headers, intake, exhaust. Basically a different fu king engine lol
Its all about who funds the mags the most. Always has been. The clear winner by far for all mags like C&D, MT, R&T etc is chevy. :lol:
If someone thinks that Magazines are the only people that rave about the new GM performance chassis, they're crazy. Randy Pobst is a Ford employee right? And he loves the new CTS, Corvette, ATS....The denial here is strong.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Its not denial. You cant prove my statement wrong either. Too much fishy stuff goes on with the magazines in general and you know it. This has been their MO since the 80s. They have played GM as a favorite, they are pretty biased. If you don't think magazines get bribes and are 100% honest, ill sell you a bridge. Im not saying GM doesn't make some great competitors, I just see the bias in the mags.The denial here is strong.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk