MGW
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Oct 9, 2014
- Threads
- 10
- Messages
- 345
- Reaction score
- 328
- Location
- AUGUSTA, GA
- Vehicle(s)
- 2015 MUSTANG
I am curious as to why this would be the case? I'd think the longer throw would be worse, stress wise, as there is more leverage? Is it because theoretically, the shorter the throw the more force that needs to be applied to change gears?
Force really has VERY little to do with it as most people have WAY more than enough strength to overcome the leverage decrease. Its all about speed.
That thinking would be like saying its impossible to overtorque a bolt and break it because you would have to turn the wrench much harder to do so .
If you give a man a shifter and it requires 30 pounds of force for a 15 percent and 40 pounds of force for 30 percent he would still have ZERO issue shifting it just as fast as his arms can move. You would have to increase the force almost triple to really have any solid effect on the average guys arm strength.
This begs the question ..why not a 70 percent reduction?? If the force applied would even out any possible stress on the trans then we could go all out. The fact remains that if you go too far, you WILL indeed start seeing synchro failures.
Just ask all the 2010-2012 GT500 customers about the 2nd gear grind on the SVT Performance pack shifters ( KR ) ..Ford tried to reduce the throw to lessen the side to side play and it became a nightmare because the front to back was reduced too much and caused synchro issues.
George
Sponsored
