Sponsored

Alignment specs for spirited DD

OP
OP
Nate_V8

Nate_V8

Well-Known Member
Joined
Nov 14, 2019
Threads
32
Messages
345
Reaction score
162
Location
Quebec
Vehicle(s)
2017 GT/CS
Toe in is a stable condition. Toe out, somewhere between less so and unstable. You want the rear to be stable rather than anxious to steer off in some other direction at least partly because you don't have direct steering control over the rear wheels.


Norm
So then why am I going to be setting 0.10-0.12 toe out in the rear? Shouldn't I be running toe in then?

Was going to use these tomorrow

Front
Camber: stock
Toe: as close to 0, same both sides

Rear
Camber: -1.4 to -1.6
Toe: 0.10 to 0.12 per side, thrust angle 0.00
Sponsored

 

dn1984

Well-Known Member
Joined
Sep 14, 2019
Threads
27
Messages
818
Reaction score
722
Location
SF Bay Area
Vehicle(s)
2018 Mustang GT A10 Premium
I had over 2 degrees of negative camber and a good amount of toe out at one point in the front of my old 2012 Mustang. The steering was razor sharp and quick, but my tires wore out a lot faster so I would not recommend going any more out than 0 for a street car. As for my current car, I'm running factory toe specs front and rear and have about 2.0 degrees negative camber front and 2.3 negative rear (I'm also lowered about 1.5"). Handles much better than stock on the same wheel/tire setup, wish I had more responsive steering though but I don't miss the tire wear on a street car. Tire wear is fine. Car still hooks up at the drag strip too so it's a good compromise.
 

Bluemustang

Well-Known Member
Joined
Nov 6, 2015
Threads
151
Messages
3,969
Reaction score
2,348
Location
Maryland
First Name
Ryan
Vehicle(s)
2015 Mustang Base GT
I had over 2 degrees of negative camber and a good amount of toe out at one point in the front of my old 2012 Mustang. The steering was razor sharp and quick, but my tires wore out a lot faster so I would not recommend going any more out than 0 for a street car. As for my current car, I'm running factory toe specs front and rear and have about 2.0 degrees negative camber front and 2.3 negative rear (I'm also lowered about 1.5"). Handles much better than stock on the same wheel/tire setup, wish I had more responsive steering though but I don't miss the tire wear on a street car. Tire wear is fine. Car still hooks up at the drag strip too so it's a good compromise.
Would probably perform even better if you lowered the rear camber to -1.5. No reason to exceed -2 on the Mustang rear suspension. Not even track guys go more than that.
 
OP
OP
Nate_V8

Nate_V8

Well-Known Member
Joined
Nov 14, 2019
Threads
32
Messages
345
Reaction score
162
Location
Quebec
Vehicle(s)
2017 GT/CS
Well looks good now, that one front tire though was unexpected
20200430_103549.jpg
 

Sponsored

OF5.0

Well-Known Member
Joined
Mar 28, 2019
Threads
15
Messages
458
Reaction score
265
Location
Pittsburgh
First Name
Scott
Vehicle(s)
2022 Shelby GT500 CFTP
Looks good...just so little front camber!
@Brian@BMVK, what should the optimum street/spirited driving all-stock suspension alignment settings be? Is this acceptable or even possible with stock suspension parts?:

Front: -1.3 degree camber
Zero toe
Zero steer ahead
Rear: -1.2 degree camber
+0.12 toe (toe in)
Zero thrust angle
 

Norm Peterson

corner barstool sitter
Joined
Jul 22, 2013
Threads
11
Messages
8,852
Reaction score
4,652
Location
On a corner barstool not too far from I-95
First Name
Norm
Vehicle(s)
'08 GT #85, '19 WRX
@Brian@BMVK, what should the optimum street/spirited driving all-stock suspension alignment settings be?
How spirited is your normal street driving? About like every other commuter/errand-runner? Can't resist rising to the challenge of a curve or corner? Somewhere in the middle?


Norm
 

OF5.0

Well-Known Member
Joined
Mar 28, 2019
Threads
15
Messages
458
Reaction score
265
Location
Pittsburgh
First Name
Scott
Vehicle(s)
2022 Shelby GT500 CFTP
How spirited is your normal street driving? About like every other commuter/errand-runner? Can't resist rising to the challenge of a curve or corner? Somewhere in the middle?


Norm
It’s not an SCCA vehicle, but I do have some great curves during my commute.
 

Sponsored

Norm Peterson

corner barstool sitter
Joined
Jul 22, 2013
Threads
11
Messages
8,852
Reaction score
4,652
Location
On a corner barstool not too far from I-95
First Name
Norm
Vehicle(s)
'08 GT #85, '19 WRX
Given that you can't adjust the front, pretty good. Is that 0.12 toe in on either side or total?
It’s not an SCCA vehicle, but I do have some great curves during my commute.
Not being an "SCCA vehicle" would not exclude it from benefitting from Ford's own factory shop manual procedure for providing camber adjustability.


Norm
 

Elp_jc

Well-Known Member
Joined
May 2, 2020
Threads
48
Messages
3,527
Reaction score
805
Location
USA
Vehicle(s)
None
Does anybody have the stock alignment specs for 2019 Bullitts? Curious about that. I took it to the twisties right after buying it (to about 0.80Gs, due to new tires and 60F temp), and it was better than I expected for such a heavy beast. Zero hiccups, and no protest from the tires, but wasn't pushing it that hard either. Just slight (and expected) understeer, but easily dialed out with the throttle. It was fun. So probably not going to change anything, but want to know how aggressive it is from the factory. Thank you.
Sponsored

 
 








Top