Sponsored

Alignment specs for spirited DD

Nate_V8

Well-Known Member
Joined
Nov 14, 2019
Threads
32
Messages
345
Reaction score
162
Location
Quebec
Vehicle(s)
2017 GT/CS
I keep reading how an alignment can really affect these cars. Coming from a line of foxes with non handling suspension I have no idea what I should be going for here.

I do very spirited on and off ramps (yea I know lol), very few launches from stop as usually the tires just blow off anyways, might go to the strip once or twice a year. Vermont/new hampshire canyons aren't far from me and can do some sweet canyon runs but I would be doing that once a summer.

Any of the gurus have an idealish spec?
Sponsored

 

Bluemustang

Well-Known Member
Joined
Nov 6, 2015
Threads
151
Messages
3,969
Reaction score
2,348
Location
Maryland
First Name
Ryan
Vehicle(s)
2015 Mustang Base GT
Highly subjective to be really honest. I could recommend several different specs depending on what your emphasis is. Drag racing is very different to carving corners/road racing. There's no optimal alignment spec for both. Any recommendations would need to be a compromise for both.
 
OP
OP
Nate_V8

Nate_V8

Well-Known Member
Joined
Nov 14, 2019
Threads
32
Messages
345
Reaction score
162
Location
Quebec
Vehicle(s)
2017 GT/CS
Hmmm well what specs do you have? I wouldn't want anything extreme on either spectrum
 

Shadow277

Well-Known Member
Joined
Nov 17, 2019
Threads
133
Messages
1,285
Reaction score
425
Location
Arizona
Vehicle(s)
2016 Mustang GT 2012 Corolla
It's objective actually. You wouldn't want toe out in the front and you don't want positive camber for the application OP wants.
 

Shadow277

Well-Known Member
Joined
Nov 17, 2019
Threads
133
Messages
1,285
Reaction score
425
Location
Arizona
Vehicle(s)
2016 Mustang GT 2012 Corolla
Most places use the spec sheet from the factory. I personally go to Firestone for the $210 lifetime alignment. If you honestly do spirited driving, you'd want them to do alignments a lot. I did that with my 2012 Civic Si. I did well over 3 alignments so it was worth it. When you lift the car, a new alignment is preferible. Especially when slapping on new tires.
 

Sponsored

Norm Peterson

corner barstool sitter
Joined
Jul 22, 2013
Threads
11
Messages
8,852
Reaction score
4,652
Location
On a corner barstool not too far from I-95
First Name
Norm
Vehicle(s)
'08 GT #85, '19 WRX
I keep reading how an alignment can really affect these cars. Coming from a line of foxes with non handling suspension I have no idea what I should be going for here.

I do very spirited on and off ramps (yea I know lol), very few launches from stop as usually the tires just blow off anyways, might go to the strip once or twice a year. Vermont/new hampshire canyons aren't far from me and can do some sweet canyon runs but I would be doing that once a summer.
For a car that's not being set up for serious dragstrip time, there isn't any need to optimize front alignment for runs at the dragstrip with skinnies up front. But you might want to run rear camber at factory preferred or perhaps a bit less negative than that, with front camber half a degree more negative than whatever you choose for rear camber.

I wouldn't go any more aggressive with the difference between front and rear camber than that; the lower rear camber will loosen the tail up a little (reduce understeer) at the same time that it gives a little more forward bite. Going overboard with lots of front negative camber to make the front stick too much better could make the car too loose.


Norm
 
OP
OP
Nate_V8

Nate_V8

Well-Known Member
Joined
Nov 14, 2019
Threads
32
Messages
345
Reaction score
162
Location
Quebec
Vehicle(s)
2017 GT/CS
My tire setup will be 275/325 soon

What about these specs?

Front
Camber: -1.8 to -2.0
Toe: 0.02 to 0.05 per side, same both sides

Rear
Camber: -1.4 to -1.6
Toe: 0.10 to 0.12 per side, thrust angle 0.00
 

AlbertD

Well-Known Member
Joined
Jun 18, 2016
Threads
74
Messages
627
Reaction score
368
Location
Tucson, AZ
Vehicle(s)
2016 GT/PP
Those specs are good. If you want the steering to be a bit more responsive/lively you could go with 0 toe up front, otherwise what you have is fine.
 
OP
OP
Nate_V8

Nate_V8

Well-Known Member
Joined
Nov 14, 2019
Threads
32
Messages
345
Reaction score
162
Location
Quebec
Vehicle(s)
2017 GT/CS
It's a more street oriented handling spec correct?


0 toe up front makes it more responsive but what is the trade off?
 

NightmareMoon

Well-Known Member
Joined
Nov 22, 2015
Threads
62
Messages
7,053
Reaction score
6,314
Location
Austin
Vehicle(s)
2016 Mustang GT PP w/ Voodoo
Vehicle Showcase
1
It's a more street oriented handling spec correct?


0 toe up front makes it more responsive but what is the trade off?
Zero toe will be ever so slightly more willing to turn at speed. Its actually the factory spec, so its not a poor choice for a daily driver. Slight toe in should make the steering a little heavier, which is nice for a car that does a lot of highway cruising, but its not really needed.

Nate_V8's specs are pretty good. Unfortunately the front camber isn't adjustable without camber plates or crash bolts or something.
 

Sponsored
OP
OP
Nate_V8

Nate_V8

Well-Known Member
Joined
Nov 14, 2019
Threads
32
Messages
345
Reaction score
162
Location
Quebec
Vehicle(s)
2017 GT/CS
The front camber isn't adjustable??? Well that sucks.

So then:

Front
Camber: stock?
Toe: as close to 0, same both sides

Rear
Camber: -1.4 to -1.6
Toe: 0.10 to 0.12 per side, thrust angle 0.00

Something like that? What will that do for the rear with the front camber not being adjustable and the rear being adjusted?
 

NightmareMoon

Well-Known Member
Joined
Nov 22, 2015
Threads
62
Messages
7,053
Reaction score
6,314
Location
Austin
Vehicle(s)
2016 Mustang GT PP w/ Voodoo
Vehicle Showcase
1
The front camber isn't adjustable??? Well that sucks.

So then:

Front
Camber: stock?
Toe: as close to 0, same both sides

Rear
Camber: -1.4 to -1.6
Toe: 0.10 to 0.12 per side, thrust angle 0.00

Something like that? What will that do for the rear with the front camber not being adjustable and the rear being adjusted?
You can make the front camber adjustable. Generally getting more front camber will be a subtle change. Getting the rear toe dialed in is one of the bigger more obvious changes.

Rear camber ~1.5-1.6 is a good place to start (its difficult to get it set precisely with the stock adjustment slot). If you increase front camber you can go a little higher on the rear camber too, but keep it under 2 degrees or you start loosing rear straight line traction pretty quickly.
 

AlbertD

Well-Known Member
Joined
Jun 18, 2016
Threads
74
Messages
627
Reaction score
368
Location
Tucson, AZ
Vehicle(s)
2016 GT/PP
What will that do for the rear with the front camber not being adjustable and the rear being adjusted?
Less camber up front will typically introduce more understeer at the limit. A lot of factory cars are configured this way since understeer is easier to manage than oversteer in most cases. With your tire size selection, the car will most likely be understeering considerably at the limit... you could make suspension changes to compensate, but the huge disparity in front/rear grip will make that a difficult task imo.
 
OP
OP
Nate_V8

Nate_V8

Well-Known Member
Joined
Nov 14, 2019
Threads
32
Messages
345
Reaction score
162
Location
Quebec
Vehicle(s)
2017 GT/CS
Well I need an alignment because I just installed the steeda stop the hop starter kit and my alignment bushings didn't go back in perfect.

I won't be doing CC plates.springs.shocks etc until next summer now but I will be getting new rims and tires (275s/325s) this summer. So I won't be able to adjust the front camber this year.


I will be changing the front sway bar next year also to compensate for the extra wide rear tires to reduce the understeer. I may go with 285s up front but I think I want to stay at 275 to reduce tram lining since it is 99% street driven.

Ok so since I'm not going to be adding CC plates or anything this year (like I said I will have CC plates for next summer) then these specs should be just fine?

Front
Camber: stock?
Toe: as close to 0, same both sides

Rear
Camber: -1.4 to -1.6
Toe: 0.10 to 0.12 per side, thrust angle 0.00

That will be ok for now?

What is impact of more or less rear toe?
 

AlbertD

Well-Known Member
Joined
Jun 18, 2016
Threads
74
Messages
627
Reaction score
368
Location
Tucson, AZ
Vehicle(s)
2016 GT/PP
That is fine. Rear toe is probably the most important to get right. You don't want to deviate much from the .10-.12 range per side.

Rear toe in is important on our cars because it allows the rear tires to follow the front....provides stability under hard braking, reduces oversteer throughout cornering, as well as provides more grip for powering out of a corner. If rear toe leans toward being negative then you will experience the exact opposite... all BAD.... you will get rear jitterness under braking, have tendency for oversteer when entering a corner and will have a hard time trying to apply power coming out of a corner.
Sponsored

 
 








Top