aleccolin
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Jun 7, 2017
- Threads
- 30
- Messages
- 744
- Reaction score
- 257
- Location
- VA
- Website
- www.CarClubVT.com
- First Name
- Colin
- Vehicle(s)
- 2016 GT PP
- Thread starter
- #1
With the Steeda progressive/adjustable springs I'm approximately at GT350R spring rates, lowered about 1.25" front and rear so a little lower than the R.
Based on the last two hours of reading I see no reason I can't just request the GT350R alignment specs, understanding that my camber will be more negative (I'm okay with that) since I do not have camber plates in front or rear adjustment beyond OE. That means the following:
Front
Camber (non-adj): probably (-1.6) to (-1.8) given my ride height
Caster (non-adj): should be around 6.9 to 7.1
Toe: 0.06 deg total toe IN (R spec)
Rear
Camber: should get to around (-1.8 to -1.9) with the OE adjustment
Toe: 0.15 degrees toe IN each side; 0.30 degrees total toe IN (R spec)
Anybody see a glaring problem with this?
Also, WTF is up with the front toe spec being different for every model? The GT/PP is zero, GT350 is (-0.10) total toe OUT, and the R is 0.06 total toe IN. Is that all tire size and ride height?
Based on the last two hours of reading I see no reason I can't just request the GT350R alignment specs, understanding that my camber will be more negative (I'm okay with that) since I do not have camber plates in front or rear adjustment beyond OE. That means the following:
Front
Camber (non-adj): probably (-1.6) to (-1.8) given my ride height
Caster (non-adj): should be around 6.9 to 7.1
Toe: 0.06 deg total toe IN (R spec)
Rear
Camber: should get to around (-1.8 to -1.9) with the OE adjustment
Toe: 0.15 degrees toe IN each side; 0.30 degrees total toe IN (R spec)
Anybody see a glaring problem with this?
Also, WTF is up with the front toe spec being different for every model? The GT/PP is zero, GT350 is (-0.10) total toe OUT, and the R is 0.06 total toe IN. Is that all tire size and ride height?
Sponsored
Last edited: