Sponsored

Alignment Specs?

ElSanchez302

Well-Known Member
Joined
Jun 9, 2015
Threads
2
Messages
78
Reaction score
12
Location
Los Angeles
Vehicle(s)
2018 GT PP1
I'm just curious what people are running. I'm not used to having to align the rear of the car. lol I did a search and really didn't turn anything up.

I'm looking for an aggressive street setup. My last '11 was -1.5 Camber, +5-6 (can't remember) caster, and 0 toe. Not even sure if that's good for the new front end on the 15's?? Really more interested in how to set the rear.
Sponsored

 

jbailer

Well-Known Member
Joined
May 1, 2015
Threads
43
Messages
3,273
Reaction score
1,291
Location
Maryland
First Name
Joe
Vehicle(s)
2015 EB Magnetic Premium PP 50AP
I'm running -2* camber in the rear. Here are the specs:
Alignment_Specs.jpg
 
OP
OP

ElSanchez302

Well-Known Member
Joined
Jun 9, 2015
Threads
2
Messages
78
Reaction score
12
Location
Los Angeles
Vehicle(s)
2018 GT PP1
Hmmm. Well, do we even know if -2 is a good idea? That seems like a lot of camber for the rear. I can only imagine the wear.
 

Sponsored

magnetic5oh

Well-Known Member
Joined
Apr 3, 2015
Threads
16
Messages
322
Reaction score
89
Location
Renton, WA
First Name
Vadim
Vehicle(s)
2015 GT
I'm running -2.2 in the rear, not by choice though. Firestone tech said that I'm maxed out and it can't be adjusted further. This is after my second alignment, I don't know if I trust their skills however. I'm lowered on Eibach sportlines, with most of my commute being highway. Anybody got any real world experience as to how bad this will eat up my tires, if any? Thanks in advance.

Also I don't see any camber bolts for the rear suspension, haven't look too hard though. Do they exist so I can get back to factory spec?
 

Mike A.

Well-Known Member
Joined
Jun 14, 2014
Threads
9
Messages
327
Reaction score
109
Location
Purcellville, Va
Vehicle(s)
2015 GT/PP
post #2 above, maybe? Or did you mean how Mustangs come set from Flat Rock?
Yeah, that looks like the stock factory specs. For some reason the image didn't show up for me, I may have been on my phone when I posted the question.
 

DarkSubRosa

GTFO_0027
Joined
Dec 9, 2013
Threads
47
Messages
2,065
Reaction score
857
Location
Nolensville, TN
Vehicle(s)
2015 Mustang GT / 2023 GT4
The rear is factory adjustable. It has an adjustment bolt on the upper arm. If you are running out of adjustment on the stock rear setup you can run a adjustable toe link from Steeda like I have and that will allow you to get more adjustment to get the camber back in closer to OEM specs. We set my rear at -1.7 and after it's all settled I'm sitting more at like -1.9. My fronts are at -1.4 with Maximum Motorsports upper adjustment plates. Getting the toe set correctly is more important for tire wear than camber. You're going to have more traction issues though coming off the line if you add a lot of camber. I was having horrible problems before I got the toe links and I let Ford do my alignment. It sucked. I found a really good local race shop and we spent 4 hours under my car getting everything perfect. The factory specs are what is posted above, they give a lot of room for error in their specs. It's pretty sloppy actually.
 

sonic

Well-Known Member
Joined
Feb 8, 2015
Threads
11
Messages
1,093
Reaction score
289
Location
NY
Vehicle(s)
Prius
NOTE: Measurements listed at curb load. Curb load is defined as "full service fluids, full fuel tank(s), no passengers and no cargo".

Item LH RH Total/Split Front Camber — (Base Coupe, Base Convertible, Performance Package Convertible, Track Package Convertible) -0.72° ± 0.75° -0.72° ± 0.75° 0.0° ± 0.75° Camber — (Performance Package Coupe, Track Package Coupe) -1.03° ± 0.75° -1.03° ± 0.75° 0.0° ± 0.75° Caster — (Base Coupe, Base Convertible, Performance Package Convertible, Track Package Convertible) 7.12° ± 0.75° 7.12° ± 0.75° 0.0° ± 0.75° Caster — (Performance Package Coupe, Track Package Coupe) 6.91° ± 0.75° 6.91° ± 0.75° 0.0° ± 0.75° Toe — (All Models) — — 0.0° ± 0.20° Rear Camber — (All Models) -1.50° ± 0.75° -1.50° ± 0.75° — Toe — (All Models) 0.12° ± 0.20° 0.12° ± 0.20° 0.23° ± 0.20°
 

sonic

Well-Known Member
Joined
Feb 8, 2015
Threads
11
Messages
1,093
Reaction score
289
Location
NY
Vehicle(s)
Prius
those are the factory out off the workshop manual
 

Sponsored

Chameleon

Well-Known Member
Gold Sponsor
Joined
Feb 17, 2014
Threads
156
Messages
11,845
Reaction score
4,237
Location
S550 INTERIOR DRESS UP
Website
www.ebay.com
Vehicle(s)
03' Cobra, 05' GT, 13' GT, 15' GT
NOTE: Measurements listed at curb load. Curb load is defined as "full service fluids, full fuel tank(s), no passengers and no cargo".

Item LH RH Total/Split Front Camber — (Base Coupe, Base Convertible, Performance Package Convertible, Track Package Convertible) -0.72° ± 0.75° -0.72° ± 0.75° 0.0° ± 0.75° Camber — (Performance Package Coupe, Track Package Coupe) -1.03° ± 0.75° -1.03° ± 0.75° 0.0° ± 0.75° Caster — (Base Coupe, Base Convertible, Performance Package Convertible, Track Package Convertible) 7.12° ± 0.75° 7.12° ± 0.75° 0.0° ± 0.75° Caster — (Performance Package Coupe, Track Package Coupe) 6.91° ± 0.75° 6.91° ± 0.75° 0.0° ± 0.75° Toe — (All Models) — — 0.0° ± 0.20° Rear Camber — (All Models) -1.50° ± 0.75° -1.50° ± 0.75° — Toe — (All Models) 0.12° ± 0.20° 0.12° ± 0.20° 0.23° ± 0.20°
Good info.
 

byklin

Well-Known Member
Joined
Oct 9, 2014
Threads
23
Messages
495
Reaction score
75
Location
CA
Vehicle(s)
2015 Magnetic GT
Turns out if your non pp you don't have camber adjustment in the back. Is that true?
 

juan_tony1

Well-Known Member
Joined
May 26, 2015
Threads
6
Messages
426
Reaction score
32
Location
North Carolina
First Name
Juan
Vehicle(s)
ECO DIB TANG
Turns out if your non pp you don't have camber adjustment in the back. Is that true?
Anyone know anything about this? Where did u get this info from?
 
 




Top