Sponsored

Did anyone ever do a Perf Pack 2 vs 1LE test?

ALUSA

Well-Known Member
Joined
Jul 13, 2017
Threads
9
Messages
558
Reaction score
179
Location
Plainfield, IL
First Name
AL
Vehicle(s)
2015 Mustang GTPP, 2017 Cadillac CTS 2.0T AWD
I'm sorry, but it's been obvious that Ford doesn't care about the 1% (else the mustang would have coolers out the wazoo)...and quite honestly, can you blame them? If I were a shareholder I sure as hell wouldn't.
Then why are we all here, why are you here defending your brand against the competition? Do you work for Ford?
Sponsored

 

BmacIL

Enginerd
Joined
Sep 21, 2014
Threads
69
Messages
14,989
Reaction score
8,910
Location
Naperville, IL
Vehicle(s)
2015 Guard GT Base, M/T
Vehicle Showcase
1
According to Millhouse, as long as Ford is selling enough Mustang Ecoboosts and GT's, they don't give a damn about the competition. This includes the GT500. They are making more than enough profit so why would they care about the 1% of customers out there who would actually track and compete with their cars. Millhouse is on to something. I say lets close all the VS Threads in these forums because its pointless. Ford is not competing, and doesn't need to. Lets carry on.
I'd say it's a smart move to sacrifice very small (in reality) amounts of real, quantitative performance in order to make cars that are much better to live with and as a result, more people want to buy. Could they have made the GT PP match the current SS? Yes. Could they have made the 15-18 GT350 easily best the SS 1LE vs being very close to it on track? Yes. Would they have added cost that was not of value to many of the customers who bought them? Yes (though less so for the GT350). It is about choices. Bragging rights over a lap, showroom stock are only worth so much, and Ford knows that most of the serious track rats modify the cars extensively and beyond what would be considered reasonable to sell anyway. I'll agree on the coolers thing on the PP2, those should absolutely be in, but otherwise I think they allocated the money smartly.
 

thehunterooo

Well-Known Member
Joined
Dec 6, 2014
Threads
23
Messages
3,254
Reaction score
1,065
Location
FL
Vehicle(s)
2006 Corvette
According to Millhouse, as long as Ford is selling enough Mustang Ecoboosts and GT's, they don't give a damn about the competition. This includes the GT500. They are making more than enough profit so why would they care about the 1% of customers out there who would actually track and compete with their cars. Millhouse is on to something. I say lets close all the VS Threads in these forums because its pointless. Ford is not competing, and doesn't need to. Lets carry on.
Would you rather cater to the 99% or 1%. As you can see the 1% will never be happy with anything and the critics/haters will always be just that. Do people who care only for profits want to dump money to updating and upgrading a model every single year so a few dozen people on a forum who live their lives a magazine 1/4 mile at a time can stroke their e cocks? Regardless which car is faster it doesn't really matter for most who buy the car and drive it around outside of a track.
 

millhouse

Well-Known Member
Joined
Jun 27, 2016
Threads
18
Messages
2,652
Reaction score
1,217
Location
Simpsonville SC
Vehicle(s)
2016 Ruby Red GT PP
Then why are we all here, why are you here defending your brand against the competition? Do you work for Ford?
This is a Ford Mustang enthusiast site is it not? The real question is, why are you here...as you're the one hyping up the competition.

I'd say it's a smart move to sacrifice very small (in reality) amounts of real, quantitative performance in order to make cars that are much better to live with and as a result, more people want to buy. Could they have made the GT PP match the current SS? Yes. Could they have made the 15-18 GT350 easily best the SS 1LE vs being very close to it on track? Yes. Would they have added cost that was not of value to many of the customers who bought them? Yes (though less so for the GT350). It is about choices. Bragging rights over a lap, showroom stock are only worth so much, and Ford knows that most of the serious track rats modify the cars extensively and beyond what would be considered reasonable to sell anyway. I'll agree on the coolers thing on the PP2, those should absolutely be in, but otherwise I think they allocated the money smartly.
GM is a bragging track whore, they have been for quite some time. They do everything they can to set record lap times so the magazines can eat them up. Ford doesn't intentionally showboat their products with lap times. They'll do some creative advertising from time to time, but they let the design and features speak for themselves. It's been working for 54 years, why change it.

If the PP2 ends up needing coolers, sure...those should have been included. But nearly every camaro owner that brags about the coolers and lap times has and will never set foot on a track...and their car will never actually utilize those coolers to be beneficial. They are giving owners items that they don't need and will never use...and are throwing away money. It's like bragging about your tires having nitrogen in them.
 

Mountain376

Well-Known Member
Joined
Nov 17, 2014
Threads
6
Messages
626
Reaction score
250
Location
SE Michigan
Vehicle(s)
'17 Camaro SS 1LE, '16 Camaro SS, '12 Mustang GT
This is a Ford Mustang enthusiast site is it not? The real question is, why are you here...as you're the one hyping up the competition.



GM is a bragging track whore, they have been for quite some time. They do everything they can to set record lap times so the magazines can eat them up. Ford doesn't intentionally showboat their products with lap times. They'll do some creative advertising from time to time, but they let the design and features speak for themselves. It's been working for 54 years, why change it.

If the PP2 ends up needing coolers, sure...those should have been included. But nearly every camaro owner that brags about the coolers and lap times has and will never set foot on a track...and their car will never actually utilize those coolers to be beneficial. They are giving owners items that they don't need and will never use...and are throwing away money. It's like bragging about your tires having nitrogen in them.
Going to stop you right there. Yeah, a large portion wont. But I will tel you this: a lot, A LOT of track people have snapped up the new Camaro because it is such a good performance car, right out of the box. People from domestic and foreign cars alike. I have see a handful of 6G Camaros at nearly every single driving event I've been to since the car came out. So, although many people will not, and this is the same with nearly every car, there is a large amount that do; and those that do, I would guarantee you, if the Camaro didn't have the coolers, the transmission, the suspension, etc., that it does, a LARGE majority of those people that are tracking these cars, would NOT be in a Camaro. I wouldn't be. I would have kept my 2012 GT and just modified it more or bought some project car. So, no, I'm going to say you are wrong in a larger sense of what you say, enough to say that you are plain wrong; 1. there are many people I come across at car cruises and shows that never have been on track before and want to because they hear of what the car is capable of and 2. first timers at driving events that show up because #1, feeling comfortable to do so because they dont have to worry about their car breaking.
 

Sponsored

martinjlm

Retired from GM
Joined
Feb 4, 2018
Threads
15
Messages
1,669
Reaction score
3,341
Location
Detroit
Vehicle(s)
2017 Camaro Fifty SS Convertible
Going to stop you right there. Yeah, a large portion wont. But I will tel you this: a lot, A LOT of track people have snapped up the new Camaro because it is such a good performance car, right out of the box. People from domestic and foreign cars alike. I have see a handful of 6G Camaros at nearly every single driving event I've been to since the car came out. So, although many people will not, and this is the same with nearly every car, there is a large amount that do; and those that do, I would guarantee you, if the Camaro didn't have the coolers, the transmission, the suspension, etc., that it does, a LARGE majority of those people that are tracking these cars, would NOT be in a Camaro. I wouldn't be. I would have kept my 2012 GT and just modified it more or bought some project car. So, no, I'm going to say you are wrong in a larger sense of what you say, enough to say that you are plain wrong; 1. there are many people I come across at car cruises and shows that never have been on track before and want to because they hear of what the car is capable of and 2. first timers at driving events that show up because #1, feeling comfortable to do so because they dont have to worry about their car breaking.
I will amen that. I am not totally new to tracking my cars. But until I got my Camaro I had only tracked Corvettes before. C4 and C5, so that was a long time ago. This Camaro is by far the most potent car I have ever tracked. One caveat....I have driven a number of GM and competitor cars in a track environment at GM Proving Grounds. These were, of course, NOT my own cars (drive it like you stole it :headbang:) and we teetered on the brink of pushing to the limits, but not abusing them. A very fine line.

Since I had a very good idea of what CA6 could take, i bought one and am very comfortable taking to the track. Weather permitting, our Camaro club will be spending the better part of the day tomorrow at Milan Dragway.
 

ALUSA

Well-Known Member
Joined
Jul 13, 2017
Threads
9
Messages
558
Reaction score
179
Location
Plainfield, IL
First Name
AL
Vehicle(s)
2015 Mustang GTPP, 2017 Cadillac CTS 2.0T AWD
This is a Ford Mustang enthusiast site is it not? The real question is, why are you here...as you're the one hyping up the competition.



GM is a bragging track whore, they have been for quite some time. They do everything they can to set record lap times so the magazines can eat them up. Ford doesn't intentionally showboat their products with lap times. They'll do some creative advertising from time to time, but they let the design and features speak for themselves. It's been working for 54 years, why change it.

If the PP2 ends up needing coolers, sure...those should have been included. But nearly every camaro owner that brags about the coolers and lap times has and will never set foot on a track...and their car will never actually utilize those coolers to be beneficial. They are giving owners items that they don't need and will never use...and are throwing away money. It's like bragging about your tires having nitrogen in them.
Since you don’t care how the mustang performs compared to the competition and seems like you hide behind the sales, i don’t see your value on the participation! For guys like you the cars are always ok the way they are but deep inside you are dying to see a mustang beat the competition on the track and testing. Its a versus thread there are other threads in this forum for other topics!
 

millhouse

Well-Known Member
Joined
Jun 27, 2016
Threads
18
Messages
2,652
Reaction score
1,217
Location
Simpsonville SC
Vehicle(s)
2016 Ruby Red GT PP
Going to stop you right there. Yeah, a large portion wont. But I will tel you this: a lot, A LOT of track people have snapped up the new Camaro because it is such a good performance car, right out of the box. People from domestic and foreign cars alike. I have see a handful of 6G Camaros at nearly every single driving event I've been to since the car came out. So, although many people will not, and this is the same with nearly every car, there is a large amount that do; and those that do, I would guarantee you, if the Camaro didn't have the coolers, the transmission, the suspension, etc., that it does, a LARGE majority of those people that are tracking these cars, would NOT be in a Camaro. I wouldn't be. I would have kept my 2012 GT and just modified it more or bought some project car. So, no, I'm going to say you are wrong in a larger sense of what you say, enough to say that you are plain wrong; 1. there are many people I come across at car cruises and shows that never have been on track before and want to because they hear of what the car is capable of and 2. first timers at driving events that show up because #1, feeling comfortable to do so because they dont have to worry about their car breaking.
Fair enough, but a majority of sales for these cars don't come from people tracking their cars. It's great for the 1%, but a complete waste for everyone else. A "LOT" of track people is still a minuscule percentage of people who buy these cars.

Since you don’t care how the mustang performs compared to the competition and seems like you hide behind the sales, i don’t see your value on the participation! For guys like you the cars are always ok the way they are but deep inside you are dying to see a mustang beat the competition on the track and testing. Its a versus thread there are other threads in this forum for other topics!
This mustang happens to be my slowest of all that I've owned (by a wide margin). I (as well as most others) purchased the mustang knowing it's slower than the camaro. It looks better, has a better seating position, more trunk space, more leg and head room for the kiddos, better visibility etc. Quite honestly, if you don't like me in here you can GTFO (as I'm not going anywhere). Otherwise, sit back and enjoy the rhetoric.
 

millhouse

Well-Known Member
Joined
Jun 27, 2016
Threads
18
Messages
2,652
Reaction score
1,217
Location
Simpsonville SC
Vehicle(s)
2016 Ruby Red GT PP
I will amen that. I am not totally new to tracking my cars. But until I got my Camaro I had only tracked Corvettes before. C4 and C5, so that was a long time ago. This Camaro is by far the most potent car I have ever tracked. One caveat....I have driven a number of GM and competitor cars in a track environment at GM Proving Grounds. These were, of course, NOT my own cars (drive it like you stole it :headbang:) and we teetered on the brink of pushing to the limits, but not abusing them. A very fine line.

Since I had a very good idea of what CA6 could take, i bought one and am very comfortable taking to the track. Weather permitting, our Camaro club will be spending the better part of the day tomorrow at Milan Dragway.
Milan's fun, but I always ran better (and had far...far fewer crowds) at Stanton. It's of course in the middle of BFE, so not the most convenient location. Still, I recall hot-lapping 10+ runs a night at Stanton.
 

Competition Orange

Well-Known Member
Joined
Aug 25, 2015
Threads
40
Messages
1,402
Reaction score
438
Location
Columbus, Ohio
Vehicle(s)
2017 GT350
Just because people "track" their car doesn't mean they need "coolers" to do it, or even to do it safely.

If we're saying those that track their cars are the 1%, those that are fast enough or live in hot climates to warrant coolers are in the top 10% of those that "track" their cars.

Additionally there are other ways to maintain a car properly even if it doesn't have coolers, such as frequent changes of the fluid.
 

Sponsored

SlaughterOfTheSoul

Actual Engineer
Joined
Feb 21, 2018
Threads
15
Messages
248
Reaction score
49
Location
Cen FL
Vehicle(s)
2018 Mustang gt pp1
Not personally worried about putting a diff cooler in or tranny cooler in. I see it as par for the course for RR.

If that's all this convo boils down to then great!
 

w3rkn

Well-Known Member
Joined
Dec 18, 2013
Threads
21
Messages
3,064
Reaction score
750
Location
Detroit
Vehicle(s)
bmw 135is(sold)
Since you don’t care how the mustang performs compared to the competition and seems like you hide behind the sales, i don’t see your value on the participation! For guys like you the cars are always ok the way they are but deep inside you are dying to see a mustang beat the competition on the track and testing. Its a versus thread there are other threads in this forum for other topics!
No, the performance delta between the two cars are not enough to choose and ugly car, over one that is sublime.

Why buy the Camaro again...




BTW, have any Camaro owners ever heard of Ford Performance Catalog (2018) ..? Where you can tailor your car to your competitive needs.
 

martinjlm

Retired from GM
Joined
Feb 4, 2018
Threads
15
Messages
1,669
Reaction score
3,341
Location
Detroit
Vehicle(s)
2017 Camaro Fifty SS Convertible
Milan's fun, but I always ran better (and had far...far fewer crowds) at Stanton. It's of course in the middle of BFE, so not the most convenient location. Still, I recall hot-lapping 10+ runs a night at Stanton.
Just got back a while ago. We had to wait for the track to dry from some early morning rains. Ran a 12.8 @ 109 and a bunch of 12.9s @ 107. Also a couple 13+ when I didn’t control wheel spin. Not too bad for a bone stock vert. Gotta work on my 60’ though. Ewww!
 

millhouse

Well-Known Member
Joined
Jun 27, 2016
Threads
18
Messages
2,652
Reaction score
1,217
Location
Simpsonville SC
Vehicle(s)
2016 Ruby Red GT PP
Just got back a while ago. We had to wait for the track to dry from some early morning rains. Ran a 12.8 @ 109 and a bunch of 12.9s @ 107. Also a couple 13+ when I didn’t control wheel spin. Not too bad for a bone stock vert. Gotta work on my 60’ though. Ewww!
Good deal. Solid runs in less than ideal conditions. :cheers:

Unfortunately there are no 1/4 mile tracks within 2 hours of me...so I've not yet been able to test things out. I fully expect high 12's won't be a problem for me in decent weather. Solidy between my stock 89 notch that ran near 14 flats and the same car that later ran 10's. :thumbsup:
 

JChors

Member
Joined
Dec 29, 2017
Threads
0
Messages
15
Reaction score
1
Location
Nor Cal
Vehicle(s)
Horse
This is purely a case of supply and demand. The SS1LE and ZL1 are made in higher volume and are simply not as desirable as the GT350/GT350R
Higher volume? The latest data available (2017 model year) shows 1,512 Camaro SS 1LE's were built. How many GT350's were built for model year 2017? And ZL1 1LE's are far rarer, just like the GT30R. As far as desirability...very subjective!:)
Sponsored

 
 








Top