millhouse
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Jun 27, 2016
- Threads
- 18
- Messages
- 2,652
- Reaction score
- 1,216
- Location
- Simpsonville SC
- Vehicle(s)
- 2016 Ruby Red GT PP
Testing proves the 10 spd auto is faster, the manual trans is slower. That was the whole point of my comment about the Bullitt maybe matching the SS with it's 20+ hp. Maybe, but not certainly.
The proper spelling is "Bullitt". Secondly, if straight line is your thing then the manual trans only Bullitt could possibly match the SS stock for stock because of it's marginally extra hp. Possibly, but only possibly.
Ouch. Forgot about that, thanks.
Then PP2 cars won't out accelerate a stock SS, and the Bullitt likely won't either.
Close perhaps, but not "dead nuts" Young Brave. If you ever drag raced, 1/10 diff means one person won and one person lost. Also, these are modern times. "Same day" comparisons are no longer required with the advent of DA correction (DA = "Density Altitude"). C&D used it for decades, and their testing reveals the manual trans Stang is 3/10 slower than either the manual or auto SS.
Funny how some Mustang aficionados (thankfully only some) ignore testing that doesn't support their preformed notions.
I'm a Mustang guy through and through, but in acceleration the manual trans Stang got beat in the Head To Head and it got beat in C&D's testing.
It is what it is man.
Wow, you really are obtuse. I’m curious, why did you choose to use ¼ mile times from a source that tested on different days instead of one that tested with the same driver, on the same day with the same DA on the same piece of asphalt with the same temperature? DA correction doesn’t account for timing pulled in modern cars nor does it account for traction differences with asphalt temperature differences. Magazines do very good for correction factors, but when you have two cars this close, use the best data that’s available…not the one that better suits your camaro fanboy agenda. Everyone here can see who you are.
As for the times…
The MPH is almost identical. A 0.1 second delta is a drivers race in every sense of the imagination. The only people that think the SS has any appreciable advantage here is….you guessed it, Camaro fanboys. I’ve been down the ¼ mile hundreds of times. 0.1 seconds can be caused by a shift in wind, a tiny amount of water on the track or taking a giant shit in between runs. The 1LE has a distinct traction advantage off the line, and the GT makes up for it on the back end of the track. On top of all of this, the mustang pulls harder up top…and has a higher top end. And you think the Bullitt is somehow going to only “catch up” to the 1LE when they are already even? Seriously, your fanboy idiocy is in full gear today isn’t it?
Oh yeah, the Bullitt is going to increase its top end by 8mph, widening the gap further on the top end over the 1LE.
This whole discussion reminds of the complete ignorance camaro fanboys had when the ÂĽ times were released for the MY18 mustang. The first low 12 second run was fake. The first 11 second run was fake. The only ÂĽ mile times that count are those that put the camaro ahead.
This isn’t a question if the Bullitt is going to be faster…that’s a done deal. It’s a question of how much faster.
Sponsored