Condor1970
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Oct 4, 2018
- Threads
- 95
- Messages
- 1,567
- Reaction score
- 582
- Location
- Port Orchard WA
- Vehicle(s)
- 2018 Mustang GT
- Thread starter
- #1
As I talked with a guy who tracks his Cayman and BMW quite a bit, I started understanding some of the theoretical mechanics behind why a "slightly" stretched tire may actually contribute to better handling, and a more comfortable ride for a lot of European cars. It makes sense, but only to a certain point, and the amount of stretch can quickly become very problematic vs a benefit as it stretches further. This idea may also be why the GT350 had a slightly stretched tire from the factory
The idea being if the sidewalls are slightly stretched, then the angled sidewall provides more compression strength when cornering hard. Whereas a vertical sidewall will give by flexing a little more. The vertical sidewall however, will theoretically maintain a slightly better contact patch when cornering because of this, as both inside and outside sidewalls flex at the same angle. As the stretched tire sidewall flexes, the outside sidewall angles more, and the inside sidewall becomes more vertical raising/applying more pressure the inside of the tire contact patch if the sidewall isn't strong enough, or not enough air pressure is present. This means sidewall strength needs to be engineered better, and proper air pressure applied for optimum contact and grip. Though the potential benefits are there.
Another potential benefit, is because the sidewall is angled inward, it contributes to more easy compression for a smoother ride over rough roads. Vertical sidewalls may flex slightly less when hitting a bump, whereas and angled sidewall will have a bit of angular preflex to allow for further compression and more absorption. The idea being a tire with a hard vertical sidewall would provide a slightly better ride when slightly stretched.
I'm certainly no expert on racing tires, but these were just some of the thoughts we discussed, but I'd like to know what you guys think as well.
The idea being if the sidewalls are slightly stretched, then the angled sidewall provides more compression strength when cornering hard. Whereas a vertical sidewall will give by flexing a little more. The vertical sidewall however, will theoretically maintain a slightly better contact patch when cornering because of this, as both inside and outside sidewalls flex at the same angle. As the stretched tire sidewall flexes, the outside sidewall angles more, and the inside sidewall becomes more vertical raising/applying more pressure the inside of the tire contact patch if the sidewall isn't strong enough, or not enough air pressure is present. This means sidewall strength needs to be engineered better, and proper air pressure applied for optimum contact and grip. Though the potential benefits are there.
Another potential benefit, is because the sidewall is angled inward, it contributes to more easy compression for a smoother ride over rough roads. Vertical sidewalls may flex slightly less when hitting a bump, whereas and angled sidewall will have a bit of angular preflex to allow for further compression and more absorption. The idea being a tire with a hard vertical sidewall would provide a slightly better ride when slightly stretched.
I'm certainly no expert on racing tires, but these were just some of the thoughts we discussed, but I'd like to know what you guys think as well.
Sponsored
Last edited: