Epiphany
Well-Known Member
I wholeheartedly agree about cats/heat. I've heard through the grapevine about what Lund witnessed when tuning their own GT500.
My comments about a shield on a resonator delete pipe aren't meant to scare anyone away. I just happen to look at a given part in terms of how optimized it may be. The difference with a resonator delete on the GT500 vs that of the GT's or GT350's you commented on is the fact that they don't come with a CF shaft and the GT500 does, hence the additional shield protection. Having experience with fiber shafts and the bonding agents sometimes used (in this case a fiber tube pressed onto "splined" ends) I think it fair to be aware of how excessive heat can potentially weaken or destroy a perfectly good driveshaft either over time or in short order. Again, dynamic temperature readings at or near the shaft with the res delete pipe/resonator pipe in place would be interesting to see. Never hurts to verify with data instead of even common sense assumptions at times. Sometimes the results are surprising.
On edit...just a data point. While not the OEM CF shaft, I respect the units coming from QA1 and even had one on my GT350. Very well engineered. They were good to talk to about the adhesives they use and their respective operating ranges. From their FAQ page on their CF shafts...
My comments about a shield on a resonator delete pipe aren't meant to scare anyone away. I just happen to look at a given part in terms of how optimized it may be. The difference with a resonator delete on the GT500 vs that of the GT's or GT350's you commented on is the fact that they don't come with a CF shaft and the GT500 does, hence the additional shield protection. Having experience with fiber shafts and the bonding agents sometimes used (in this case a fiber tube pressed onto "splined" ends) I think it fair to be aware of how excessive heat can potentially weaken or destroy a perfectly good driveshaft either over time or in short order. Again, dynamic temperature readings at or near the shaft with the res delete pipe/resonator pipe in place would be interesting to see. Never hurts to verify with data instead of even common sense assumptions at times. Sometimes the results are surprising.
On edit...just a data point. While not the OEM CF shaft, I respect the units coming from QA1 and even had one on my GT350. Very well engineered. They were good to talk to about the adhesives they use and their respective operating ranges. From their FAQ page on their CF shafts...
Big delta between 200 and 320. Ford was sourcing their lay up tubes from Toray on the '13/'14 GT500 but I'm not sure who they are sourcing them from on the '20. Regardless, the construction is no doubt very similar. Some were concerned about damage from debris but I think it fair to say that hasn't been an issue. I'll be honest, I haven't seen damage to an OEM Ford CF shaft that was attributed solely to heat to date and admit that my own concern may lie at the outer fringe. In addition, I'll likely add a resonator delete to my own GT500 and really like what I see from you.What is the operating temperature range?
It depends on the resin and structural adhesive that’s used. We currently have one system developed with a maximum temp rating of about 200°F. We have developed another that is good to about 320°F.
Last edited: