New Holley Intakes

[Dapepper9]

GT tb pattern should have been on the snout, GT350 and LS on an adapter.

GT tb pattern with a 90mm hole

Sponsored

 

[GregO]

Not uncommon for people swapping coyotes into other platforms to use LS based TB to go with their Holley controller. Same pattern as GT350 though so it still works fine

Or possibly;
https://www.solerengineering.com/generalmotors/se1000-107

 

[MKL_DS]

GT tb pattern should have been on the snout, GT350 and LS on an adapter.

While this happens to clear the stock hood and work in the Mustang chassis, it wasn't designed as a bolt on for late model Mustangs. Like many of the Holley intakes, its intent is to live in a swap application. For the guy building a coyote swap vehicle, the stock Mustang throttle body probably makes little sense. Also, the stock 80mm TB is not the best choice for an all-out NA application.

 

[80FoxCoupe]

While this happens to clear the stock hood and work in the Mustang chassis, it wasn't designed as a bolt on for late model Mustangs. Like many of the Holley intakes, its intent is to live in a swap application. For the guy building a coyote swap vehicle, the stock Mustang throttle body probably makes little sense. Also, the stock 80mm TB is not the best choice for an all-out NA application.

I suppose I'm looking at it from a sales aspect. I'd assume 11-23 mustang and coyote f150 owners would be the bulk of all purchases. Only fox body owners swap in coyotes, with like an f100 owner here and there.

 

[Strokerswild]

With the packaging being the primary driver of plenum volume, any differences in performance (pos or neg) would be virtually immeasurable.

Yeah, I'm a little puzzled why they bothered with so many versions....

 

[Cory S]

With the packaging being the primary driver of plenum volume, any differences in performance (pos or neg) would be virtually immeasurable.

Much less when the manifold is completely pressurized with boost as well.

 

[AZlb5.0]

Looks good and not being a “finished product” allows for many applications. Will this be good for LS applications? It’s hard to beat the FAST products or the LS3 intake. For ours I think it’ll be great for FI but for NA application is probably stick with my stock 18 manifold. Especially if it’s going to be a daily. If it’s an all out track effort build then I see this as a great option.

 

[MKL_DS]

I suppose I'm looking at it from a sales aspect. I'd assume 11-23 mustang and coyote f150 owners would be the bulk of all purchases. Only fox body owners swap in coyotes, with like an f100 owner here and there.

In todays world, you have to do your best to develop for and test across a broad range of applications and then take what you can get.


This part is legal for sale and use on Uncontrolled (Non-Emissions Controlled) Vehicles.

The following vehicles are considered Uncontrolled (Non-Emissions Controlled) Vehicles:

• 1965 and older U.S. manufactured California Certified vehicles
• 1967 and older U.S. manufactured Federally Certified vehicles
• 1967 and older Foreign manufactured vehicle

WARNING: It is against the law to install this part on an Emissions Controlled Vehicle

The following vehicles are considered Emissions Controlled Vehicles:

• 1966 and newer U.S. manufactured California Certified vehicles
• 1968 and newer U.S. manufactured Federally Certified vehicles
• 1968 and newer Foreign manufactured vehicle

 

[K4fxd]

Only fox body owners swap in coyotes, with like an f100 owner here and there.

As much as I love the coyote it is hard to give up the cubic inches the LS platform can attain.

For ours I think it’ll be great for FI but for NA application is probably stick with my stock 18 manifold.

I'd really like to see the dyno sheet on it.

 

[WildHorse]

Any plans to port or run as cast?

Yeah port it. Got a buddy with an extrude honing machine.

 

[Strokerswild]

Yeah port it. Got a buddy with an extrude honing machine.

Nice, haven't seen one of those machines in years....

 

[Dapepper9]

Looks good and not being a “finished product” allows for many applications. Will this be good for LS applications? It’s hard to beat the FAST products or the LS3 intake. For ours I think it’ll be great for FI but for NA application is probably stick with my stock 18 manifold. Especially if it’s going to be a daily. If it’s an all out track effort build then I see this as a great option.

What does the LS have to do with this? Different displacements, different head flow characteristics, different cam characteristics

Only dyno sheet currently floating around attached with the post by the guy who did the testing (not a Holley employee btw).

 

[80FoxCoupe]

Yeah port it. Got a buddy with an extrude honing machine.

Carbide bit is the way to go.

 

[AZlb5.0]

What does the LS have to do with this? Different displacements, different head flow characteristics, different cam characteristics

Only dyno sheet currently floating around attached with the post by the guy who did the testing (not a Holley employee btw).

They said that it could be used for LS applications that’s why I mentioned the LS based motor and what has been proven to work. If it is shown to get good gains for our cars then send it.

 

[Dapepper9]

They said that it could be used for LS applications that’s why I mentioned the LS based motor and what has been proven to work. If it is shown to get good gains for our cars then send it.

I think you misunderstood. The round inlet uses the GT350 throttlebody bolt pattern but also LS throttlebodies.

Sponsored