If all you’re looking at is horsepower then yeah the crapmaro is a great deal. Otherwise it’s horrible to drive and the trunk is useless. I’d rather have a vette.
your long time salesman didn't do you any favors. $60k is full msrp the way you have it optioned.
yeah lets forget about the alpha chassis and having the tremec 6060 transmission. to me the camaro is far from horrible to drive lol. i can only assume you mean the visibility which i still to this day have no issue with at all.
Absolutely, 100%. I'm betting you could afford the Mach 1 but your head overruled your heart. Nothing wrong with that. And you got an awesome car as well. Maybe there will be a used Mach 1 in your future.
You can't see out of it and you can't even put golf clubs in the trunk.
i see just fine. The rear view mirror camera also makes the rear window a non issue. i can see everything behind me. I think it depends on your body build, and proportions. But at 6'4 ~205 i see very well. Also consider i came from a honda s2000 not long ago, so maybe that affects my judgement.
yeah, i was considering waiting for the mach 1 before making my decision. Ended up selling my mustang for more than i put in to it, and very happy with my new car.
Well, to each their own.
Well, to each their own.
i prefer this forum and its members, hence why i stick around haha
Nope, I love my GT/CS. It’s everything I wanted and more. Plan is to keep it 10 years or so. Unless I hit the lottery. Then it’s a GT500.
price was not msrp. MSRP of my 2ss 1le was about the same as a few pp1 mustang around me; which to me is a no brainer. 1ss 1le was ~45k msrp give or take depending on some additional options.
The way I read Sinbuster's post was that it's nearly as hard to justify car prices in general as it is to justify the Mach 1's in particular. I agree, partly because I remember what car prices have been over the years and partly because when you're living on a mostly fixed income, option prices and price increases in general only serve to sound even less reasonable.