Gogoggansgo
Well-Known Member
- Thread starter
- #1
Has anyone actually put one of the dyno and gotten a comparison with a regular Ecoboost. There is no data on the HPP cars at all
Sponsored
Gotta a linkCobb has dynos of eb and hpp
yeah but I’m talking about a real world comparison lolGotta gooooogle it
I saw it though, they have maps for regular and hpp now
I’m on iPhone. Can’t do too much easily on here
It has the small intercoolerhttps://www.cobbtuning.com/maps/2020-ford-mustang-ecoboost-hpp-stage-1-map
looks like peak TQ at 330 ish and peak HP at 280 ish....
isnt that similar to a non HPP , at least in terms of HP? Ive seen I few '15-17 dyno with peak HP at 275 - 280.
Im NO dyno reader expert (obviously), why does it have that up and down behavior for the HP? it reaches peak then drops, then goes up, then drops, then goes up a bit and droooopppss.
Any updates?Ok, my $.02, my previous car was a 2016 PP, IC upgrade and FPP tune. The HPP is superior in power and power band to that car. The 2016 was a fun car and with the FPP tune it was really good, but not as good as the HPP with the factory tune. Can't compare COBB tunes, I only had the FPP tune. These are my impressions of both cars with factory or FPP tunes, not saying one tuned by a vendor is better than the other. Does it heat soak from the factory IC? YES it does. I'm installing a CPE intercooler this week to see how it does. I ran this car in autocross with 5 minute idles in between runs and frankly did not see a noticeable drop in power, except it didn't like heat-soaked launches. But the car was faster each run, granted, never came off 2nd gear during the run and probably it was me getting better with it. I have another autocross next weekend, should have the intercooler installed for it and better driving impressions.