sachmo133
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Feb 28, 2023
- Threads
- 6
- Messages
- 55
- Reaction score
- 27
- Location
- Lebanon, TN
- First Name
- Mike
- Vehicle(s)
- 2021 Mach 1
- Thread starter
- #1
I'm trying to get my Mach 1 aligned with HP track specs. I have a nonHP car but have Steeda adjustable camber plates installed so the front should be fine to do. I took it to a dealer, I know but I asked them several times if they could do it and they told me yes, they could. Even talked to the guy that does it. Got my car back the front camber was -1.6 and -1.9 and the rear was -1.1 and -1.7.
When I called them about it they said they did it because they didn't want to be responsible for my tires wearing out faster than normal. (made it sound like it was going to be right away). After soon back and forth and telling them I know that the alignment will cause tires to wear out sooner and that I'm ok with it. I only drive about 4K a year and I do about 12 track days a year. I asked for an HP track alignment and was told that you could do it so that is what I want. In the end, I'm getting them to do the alignment again.
The odd this is that the car's camber is not balanced left to right. Even in the back, it is spec'ed for -1.5 so it is more and less on the sides. How important is it to have it the same?
When I called them about it they said they did it because they didn't want to be responsible for my tires wearing out faster than normal. (made it sound like it was going to be right away). After soon back and forth and telling them I know that the alignment will cause tires to wear out sooner and that I'm ok with it. I only drive about 4K a year and I do about 12 track days a year. I asked for an HP track alignment and was told that you could do it so that is what I want. In the end, I'm getting them to do the alignment again.
The odd this is that the car's camber is not balanced left to right. Even in the back, it is spec'ed for -1.5 so it is more and less on the sides. How important is it to have it the same?
Sponsored