Sponsored

GT Performance Package

Do you think the GT Performance Package is worth the money?


  • Total voters
    310

Norm Peterson

corner barstool sitter
Joined
Jul 22, 2013
Threads
11
Messages
8,852
Reaction score
4,652
Location
On a corner barstool not too far from I-95
First Name
Norm
Vehicle(s)
'08 GT #85, '19 WRX
Eh, because you can definitely tell a difference when driving a Mustang vs a focus. You're not really going to tell a difference from that torsen, those brembos, that radiator, etc. when driving a PP on the road vs. driving a regular GT. Aside from maybe the bouncier suspension.
A firmer and more responsive suspension and brakes with better initial bite are things you absolutely will feel even though the amount of measured performance you're demanding of them was kept the same. And you might get spoiled by that, since you really don't have to be driving very hard to notice these things if you're either paying attention or just taking PP and non-PP cars on back to back drives over the same route.

I bet the difference from swapping a set of PP wheels and tires onto a non-PP and doing nothing else is something that quite a few people here would notice almost right away.

Though I suppose there are folks who'd have trouble noticing such differences and for whom a non-PP would be the better choice.


Norm
Sponsored

 

BmacIL

Enginerd
Joined
Sep 21, 2014
Threads
69
Messages
14,989
Reaction score
8,907
Location
Naperville, IL
Vehicle(s)
2015 Guard GT Base, M/T
Vehicle Showcase
1
The difference between the two on the road is EASILY noticeable if you push the car at all, even to only 6/10ths. I'd argue the only thing you won't notice is the radiator.
 

TexasRebel

Gearshifter
Joined
Mar 19, 2016
Threads
27
Messages
2,493
Reaction score
836
Location
between the mustard and the mayo
Vehicle(s)
2016 YZ GTPP - PP2
Curious as to what your shifting routine is in traffic to get 24MPG. Not that I'm concerned about it but I'm getting about 16MPG. This is also my first manual.
Me, too.

I can get 24-26 mpg if I do nothing but highway driving at 60-65 mph

Mixed highway/city is a solid 19-21 mpg.

Burning a full tank in town, 16 mpg is about right.
 

Zelek

Well-Known Member
Joined
Feb 11, 2016
Threads
102
Messages
4,818
Reaction score
4,772
Location
Hutto, TX
First Name
Matt
Vehicle(s)
2021 Mustang Mach 1
When I test drove 2016 models last year, I could easily tell a difference between a PP and a non PP. Hence, I chose the PP.
 

Sponsored

Rambl3r

Well-Known Member
Joined
Jun 26, 2016
Threads
14
Messages
1,146
Reaction score
571
Location
Southern CA
Vehicle(s)
2016 PP GT
Me, too.

I can get 24-26 mpg if I do nothing but highway driving at 60-65 mph

Mixed highway/city is a solid 19-21 mpg.

Burning a full tank in town, 16 mpg is about right.
Thanks! Yeah, this L.A. traffic so I guess the 16mpg isn't bad ;)
 

2morrow

DesignR/DriveR/RiceEatR
Joined
Nov 15, 2015
Threads
58
Messages
6,492
Reaction score
6,104
Location
NorCal Bay Area
First Name
Todd
Vehicle(s)
'16 Mustang GTPP
Me, too.

I can get 24-26 mpg if I do nothing but highway driving at 60-65 mph

Mixed highway/city is a solid 19-21 mpg.

Burning a full tank in town, 16 mpg is about right.
I’m about the same. Sometimes I can get up to 28 MPG on the highway with my feather-foot technique.
 

Chad11491

Well-Known Member
Joined
Nov 9, 2015
Threads
5
Messages
765
Reaction score
364
Location
Roswell, GA
Vehicle(s)
17 Lightning Blue GT Premium PP
Changing the wheels and tires on my pp from pirellis to PSS was a night and day difference. The brakes and suspension were immediately noticeable on short test drives vs a base GT. I'd argue that if you can't feel the difference between the two you wouldn't feel the difference vs a Camry lol.
 

Zelek

Well-Known Member
Joined
Feb 11, 2016
Threads
102
Messages
4,818
Reaction score
4,772
Location
Hutto, TX
First Name
Matt
Vehicle(s)
2021 Mustang Mach 1
Changing the wheels and tires on my pp from pirellis to PSS was a night and day difference. The brakes and suspension were immediately noticeable on short test drives vs a base GT. I'd argue that if you can't feel the difference between the two you wouldn't feel the difference vs a Camry lol.
Yeah, the P-Zeros vs the PSS aren't even in the same league. I plan on doing the same thing.
 

AttiS550

Well-Known Member
Joined
Jul 10, 2015
Threads
34
Messages
340
Reaction score
100
Location
San Diego, CA
Vehicle(s)
2016 Mustang GT Premium
I’m about the same. Sometimes I can get up to 28 MPG on the highway with my feather-foot technique.
wow! I get about 15 MPG with my lead weight foot technique :D:lol:
 

Sponsored

2morrow

DesignR/DriveR/RiceEatR
Joined
Nov 15, 2015
Threads
58
Messages
6,492
Reaction score
6,104
Location
NorCal Bay Area
First Name
Todd
Vehicle(s)
'16 Mustang GTPP
Changing the wheels and tires on my pp from pirellis to PSS was a night and day difference. The brakes and suspension were immediately noticeable on short test drives vs a base GT.
I'd argue that if you can't feel the difference between the two you wouldn't feel the difference vs a Camry lol.
:lol:

wow! I get about 15 MPG with my lead weight foot technique :D:lol:
:lol:x2!
 

terryz

Well-Known Member
Joined
Apr 3, 2016
Threads
10
Messages
155
Reaction score
25
Location
SF, CA
Vehicle(s)
2016 Mustang GT base manual
To me, the biggest drawback for the PP is the 3.73 final ratio, too short for DD. Other parts are sweet, although you may not necessarily utilize all of them on the street.
 

jrsimon27

Well-Known Member
Joined
Apr 3, 2015
Threads
74
Messages
655
Reaction score
149
Location
Outside the USA
Vehicle(s)
Mustang GT 2016 PP
To me, the biggest drawback for the PP is the 3.73 final ratio, too short for DD. Other parts are sweet, although you may not necessarily utilize all of them on the street.
Why would it? Shelby super snakes use 3.73 gears
Sponsored

 
 








Top