IPOGT
Well-Known Member
I'll say this. As a placeholder it did a great job. I would still own one if it were the only thing around.Like I said, the car was under-appreciated by the musclecar crowd for the obvious reason (short of it being the basis for a V8 swap project) and the sports car people still tended to look down on anything that was U.S. Domestic.
A few recognized the car's potential as a sports car / autocross car, enough of us for small companies like Spearco to exist and for the various aftermarket sources of engine hard parts to develop products for the car as well.
The Mustang II by being a little bigger and somewhat heavier (and more nose-heavy) represented a weakening of the Pinto's strengths as a sports car in exchange for gaining a little street credibility when it finally got its proper V8.
Norm
At the time, that world if I remember correctly, 1973-75, was dominated by the F body 2and gen Camaros and Firebirds due to the 455SD, LT1, and the exposure to arguably the first muscle car that actually considered handling as a design parameter. GM was moving forward and Ford backward, but those were challenging times.
The Mustang 2 had no chance at the time, IMHO vs. the 2nd gen F bodies nevermind the Corvette.
Sponsored
Last edited:
