Sponsored

Gen2s are just better looking

IPOGT

Well-Known Member
Joined
Feb 11, 2016
Threads
71
Messages
4,731
Reaction score
5,861
Location
Southern Long Island Section Of Florida
Vehicle(s)
2021 Mustang Mach 1 Velocity Blue M6, 2019 Porsche Cayman S
Like I said, the car was under-appreciated by the musclecar crowd for the obvious reason (short of it being the basis for a V8 swap project) and the sports car people still tended to look down on anything that was U.S. Domestic.

A few recognized the car's potential as a sports car / autocross car, enough of us for small companies like Spearco to exist and for the various aftermarket sources of engine hard parts to develop products for the car as well.

The Mustang II by being a little bigger and somewhat heavier (and more nose-heavy) represented a weakening of the Pinto's strengths as a sports car in exchange for gaining a little street credibility when it finally got its proper V8.


Norm
I'll say this. As a placeholder it did a great job. I would still own one if it were the only thing around.
At the time, that world if I remember correctly, 1973-75, was dominated by the F body 2and gen Camaros and Firebirds due to the 455SD, LT1, and the exposure to arguably the first muscle car that actually considered handling as a design parameter. GM was moving forward and Ford backward, but those were challenging times.
The Mustang 2 had no chance at the time, IMHO vs. the 2nd gen F bodies nevermind the Corvette.
Sponsored

 
Last edited:

IPOGT

Well-Known Member
Joined
Feb 11, 2016
Threads
71
Messages
4,731
Reaction score
5,861
Location
Southern Long Island Section Of Florida
Vehicle(s)
2021 Mustang Mach 1 Velocity Blue M6, 2019 Porsche Cayman S
But then again, I'm partial to 2nd gen F bodies so I may be somewhat biased.
 

Semp1

Well-Known Member
Joined
Apr 26, 2019
Threads
73
Messages
1,118
Reaction score
581
Location
Valhalla
Vehicle(s)
2018 Mustang GT PP1 Magneride
I always felt the 15-17 looked too much like a fusion very watered down. Not menacing at all. The 18+ to me looks mean. And the tail lights and rear diffuser on the 18 are waaaaaaay nicer. Period.
 

dequardo50

Member
Joined
Jun 14, 2019
Threads
2
Messages
9
Reaction score
17
Location
Waukesha WI
First Name
Mike
Vehicle(s)
2017 EB Premium. Magnetic. 6sp auto.
15-17s for me
 

WhiteyDog

WOOF!!!
Joined
Jun 30, 2016
Threads
16
Messages
1,788
Reaction score
733
Location
Manheim, Pa.
Vehicle(s)
16
IF I would buy another Mustang (which I highly doubt will happen), it would have to be a GT350 or GT500. Sure as h*ll not a 2018 on up GT or EB. They definitely took a step backwards in looks.
 

Sponsored

LarsenGrind

Well-Known Member
Joined
May 15, 2016
Threads
25
Messages
417
Reaction score
394
Location
Denmark, Europe
First Name
Lars
Vehicle(s)
2017 Euro-Spec GT
I ordered a MY'17 late July '16. I liked the 15-17 front over the 18. Back then pics and info were starting to come out. I did like some of the features of the refresh tbh. But if U wait on the new new, then U can always wait. I still like the 15+ front over the 18+. But I have put in the digital cluster and quad tips with an AC diffusser. Those were some of the features I wanted from the refresh. Still would like to have the different exhaust modes.
Sadly the 15-17 exports came without hood vents, Tri-bar DRL, strut tower brace, and PP gauges. Ford put half the stuff on, on the 18+.
 

Varanjar

Member
Joined
Jul 14, 2020
Threads
0
Messages
12
Reaction score
29
Location
Hudson Valley
Vehicle(s)
2019 Mustang EcoBoost
I'm surprised by some of the replies here. The cars are nearly identical, to the point where you have to look close to figure out which year it is. Pointed headlight corners or cut-off ones... Straight tail lights or angled... I can understand having a preference, but I don't know how you could think any particular year is ugly. You'd think you were talking about Camaros, the true abomination.

I'm one of the many here who remembers when the Mustang II was new, and it did get a lot of flak where I was, but what hurt it more where I grew up was the fact that cheap musclecars were everywhere. Any kid in high school could have a '60s Nova, Camaro, GTO, etc etc. People didn't really do anything with the Mustang II because no one had any money in the '70s, and you could get a beater '68 fastback, or whatever for pennies. They didn't care about the car, period. A neighbor kid had a '65 fastback with a 289 that he rattle-canned the interior in just to change the color. That's how common that stuff was.
 

Zelek

Well-Known Member
Joined
Feb 11, 2016
Threads
102
Messages
4,822
Reaction score
4,774
Location
Hutto, TX
First Name
Matt
Vehicle(s)
2021 Mustang Mach 1
I dunno. I think the new Mach 1 looks better than my 17. Good thing it's just my opinion.
 

Blue Moon

Well-Known Member
Joined
Dec 23, 2017
Threads
5
Messages
1,347
Reaction score
1,383
Location
Maine, or eastern Canada
First Name
Pete
Vehicle(s)
17 Ecoboost Perform Pack Std
What I don't get is people complaining that it looks like a Fusion. IMO, the Fusion is a good looking car.
 

zworld

Well-Known Member
Joined
Jan 11, 2020
Threads
36
Messages
218
Reaction score
173
Location
wichita ks
First Name
zane
Vehicle(s)
2018 mustang gt
This is a silly thread. I read them all just for fun. Of coarse every comment is biased toward what that person owns lol!
 

Sponsored

Balr14

Well-Known Member
Joined
Jul 31, 2019
Threads
32
Messages
2,688
Reaction score
2,520
Location
SE Wisconsin
First Name
John
Vehicle(s)
BMW Z4 M40i
This is a silly thread. I read them all just for fun. Of coarse every comment is biased toward what that person owns lol!
Unless you put a 2107 and 2018 next to each other, I couldn't tell them apart and really wouldn't care. I can't even make up some lame reason why I like the 2018 cosmetics better.
 

WildHorse

N/A or GO HOME
Joined
Jun 28, 2017
Threads
270
Messages
10,297
Reaction score
8,350
Location
Home World: CLASSIFIED
First Name
Puddintane
Vehicle(s)
'17 S550
Vehicle Showcase
1
I think you just might have figured out everything there is to know about people.
Never cared for the s197 looks. When the 15's came out, boom I was hooked. Then waited 2 years for the colour I wanted. For the 18+ I just don't like the squished very angular front end, or the M82 D4.
 

Shifting_Gears

Well-Known Member
Joined
Sep 13, 2018
Threads
88
Messages
1,981
Reaction score
1,658
Location
South Florida
Vehicle(s)
2016 Mustang GT
Update from my last post.

I still prefer the 15-17 :rockon:

I wouldn’t kick an 18+ out of the stable though. Especially a PP1/PP2 car... ooooh buddy.
Sponsored

 
 








Top