It does. More noticeable on the 488 GT3.The front splitter almost looks like it has negative rake?
I agree 100%. I've spoke to AJ quite a bit. He told me the best results for the splitter are zero or slightly positive rake. He said negative (meaning front to back) no good. I run my splitter as close to zero as I can get it to help that air get under the car but still have the df I need. Seems weird to run negative but if other aero is generating that much front downforce and the benefits of forcing more air under the car outweigh the losses of a little downforce then numbers don't lie. I suppose if the air is moving that freely and that diffuser does its job than the zeroed out wing with huge side panels is purely for balance more than rear downforce.It does. More noticeable on the 488 GT3.
I'm no aerodynamicist, but from what I understand, you want to get more air going under the car and speed that flow up to create a greater negative pressure region.
Think of the entire underbody of the car as an airfoil shape. The splitter has an upward angle same as the leading edge of a wing and the diffuser would have the same upward angle acting as the trailing edge of the wing.
AJ Hartman on TMO could explain it much better.
Most people take this approach for aero
And real race cars do this
Not exactly pretty but i suppose it will look better in a brighter colour . The S650 Australian supercar is looking the goods thoughAdding some pictures
Same 5.4 as in the Supercars though reliability might be a problem:DH-GT3 next year is going to be awesome to watch. DH-R and S out in events as well. Any word what engine will be in the DH-R, S?
5.0 probably maybe 5.4?