Sponsored

Compression question

OldPhart

Well-Known Member
Joined
Nov 20, 2018
Threads
44
Messages
431
Reaction score
844
Location
Rochester, NY area
First Name
Bruce
Vehicle(s)
‘05 GMC P/U, ‘17 Impala, 19 Bullitt
I’m new to Mustangs. Just a curiosity question. With the 12:1 compression ratio on these new engines, is 93 octane high enough? I assume everybody uses 93 octane for routine driving. Does the computer automatically adjust to whatever octane fuel we use? I’m not a gear head so excuse the naive question. I’m used to muscle cars from the ‘60s and without adjusting the timing my GTO (10.5:1) detonates on anything less than 93 octane and adjusting the timing isn’t the ideal way to get rid of detonation. I could use some educating on this issue... Bruce
Sponsored

 

EFI

Well-Known Member
Joined
May 19, 2015
Threads
65
Messages
5,287
Reaction score
4,733
Location
Masshole central
Vehicle(s)
5.Br0
Yes 93 is enough. And yes, the computer manages timing very well and can even be run on lower octane gas.

Check your manual for recommended and minimum octane.

Ford would not make a mass produced car that could not be run on the gasoline available in 99.9999% of US gas stations if the engine would not work on 93.
 

LETHAL

From the D but in the NC
Joined
Sep 26, 2015
Threads
45
Messages
1,653
Reaction score
564
Location
Asheville, NC
First Name
Kevin
Vehicle(s)
2018 GT A10
Vehicle Showcase
1
12:1 is far different with duel injection of today vs. 12:1 of the 60's-70's.

That said, can you run 87-89 octane..yes Would I? No.

It's worth every penny extra to me to get every horse power available.

That and I can't anyways, mine is tuned LOL
 
OP
OP
OldPhart

OldPhart

Well-Known Member
Joined
Nov 20, 2018
Threads
44
Messages
431
Reaction score
844
Location
Rochester, NY area
First Name
Bruce
Vehicle(s)
‘05 GMC P/U, ‘17 Impala, 19 Bullitt
12:1 is far different with duel injection of today vs. 12:1 of the 60's-70's.

That said, can you run 87-89 octane..yes Would I? No.

It's worth every penny extra to me to get every horse power available.

That and I can't anyways, mine is tuned LOL
Thanks. At my age I won’t be doing any tuning, etc. that will require extra octane. That could be dangerous to my health... Bruce
 

NoVaGT

Banned
Banned
Banned
Joined
Sep 29, 2016
Threads
115
Messages
5,621
Reaction score
4,377
Location
Northern Virginia
Vehicle(s)
2019 PP1 GT Kona
Thanks. At my age I won’t be doing any tuning, etc. that will require extra octane. That could be dangerous to my health... Bruce
No.......tuning doesn't "require extra octane". You can run 93 octane, or you can get a tune to run lower octanes, although I don't know why you would.

And I'm baffled by "That could be dangerous to my health..."
 

Sponsored

Livernois Motorsports

Well-Known Member
Joined
Oct 25, 2014
Threads
226
Messages
2,801
Reaction score
955
Location
Dearborn Heights, Michigan
Website
www.livernoismotorsports.com
First Name
S550 HQ
Vehicle(s)
2016 Mustang GT (TVS 2650) (6R80)
It is Idea to run the higher octane fuel because it will burn cleaner. Will get you better mpg and also the most power. If you start doing dedicated performance tunes to it then you would have to run that octane only. But the manual I'm pretty sure says you should not run anything less then 91 octane.
 
OP
OP
OldPhart

OldPhart

Well-Known Member
Joined
Nov 20, 2018
Threads
44
Messages
431
Reaction score
844
Location
Rochester, NY area
First Name
Bruce
Vehicle(s)
‘05 GMC P/U, ‘17 Impala, 19 Bullitt
No.......tuning doesn't "require extra octane". You can run 93 octane, or you can get a tune to run lower octanes, although I don't know why you would.

And I'm baffled by "That could be dangerous to my health..."
At my age, 77 in January, anything that results in a faster car is potentially dangerous. I say this as self deprecating or tongue in cheek humor. I’m old so I can poke fun at my old age... Bruce
 
OP
OP
OldPhart

OldPhart

Well-Known Member
Joined
Nov 20, 2018
Threads
44
Messages
431
Reaction score
844
Location
Rochester, NY area
First Name
Bruce
Vehicle(s)
‘05 GMC P/U, ‘17 Impala, 19 Bullitt
It is Idea to run the higher octane fuel because it will burn cleaner. Will get you better mpg and also the most power. If you start doing dedicated performance tunes to it then you would have to run that octane only. But the manual I'm pretty sure says you should not run anything less then 91 octane.
Thanks, I’ve been getting a good education on octane, tuning and engine compression. I had a ‘91 LT1 Corvette so I am superficially aware of these issues but weak in the technical reasoning area... Bruce
 

brucelinc

Well-Known Member
Joined
Jan 25, 2018
Threads
14
Messages
3,104
Reaction score
2,132
Location
MN
First Name
Bruce
Vehicle(s)
2018 Mustang GT premium A10 (SOLD)
At the drag strip where I run there is a 78 year old who runs his 1971 Chevelle. His reaction times may not be quite what they once were but he has a lot of fun and is great to chat with. His little brother is only 75 and they are always together at the track. It is great to see older folks still messing around with fast cars.
 
OP
OP
OldPhart

OldPhart

Well-Known Member
Joined
Nov 20, 2018
Threads
44
Messages
431
Reaction score
844
Location
Rochester, NY area
First Name
Bruce
Vehicle(s)
‘05 GMC P/U, ‘17 Impala, 19 Bullitt
At the drag strip where I run there is a 78 year old who runs his 1971 Chevelle. His reaction times may not be quite what they once were but he has a lot of fun and is great to chat with. His little brother is only 75 and they are always together at the track. It is great to see older folks still messing around with fast cars.
Hey, thank for the compliment. I graduated from H.S. In 1960 and was fortunate to experience the ‘60s muscle car era. We’re all fortunate that it has been resurrected and I can state that once it’s in your blood it stays. As you can see from my profile I also have a ‘65 GTO, a sibling to the one I bought new upon graduating from college. Like so many, I went through the family era with Buick’s, Hondas, etc. My mid-life crisis car was a ‘92 Vette which reminded me of the fun I had been missing for so many years - never again until they hide my keys on me... Bruce
 

Sponsored

brucelinc

Well-Known Member
Joined
Jan 25, 2018
Threads
14
Messages
3,104
Reaction score
2,132
Location
MN
First Name
Bruce
Vehicle(s)
2018 Mustang GT premium A10 (SOLD)
Hey, thank for the compliment. I graduated from H.S. In 1960 and was fortunate to experience the ‘60s muscle car era. We’re all fortunate that it has been resurrected and I can state that once it’s in your blood it stays. As you can see from my profile I also have a ‘65 GTO, a sibling to the one I bought new upon graduating from college. Like so many, I went through the family era with Buick’s, Hondas, etc. My mid-life crisis car was a ‘92 Vette which reminded me of the fun I had been missing for so many years - never again until they hide my keys on me... Bruce
Glad you are on the forum, Bruce!
 

Zinc03svt

Well-Known Member
Joined
Jun 3, 2018
Threads
30
Messages
2,337
Reaction score
1,272
Location
usa
Vehicle(s)
stang
4 knock sensors on 18 plus cars help keep things alive. Fun to see this muscle car revival for sure.
 

2018OFPP1?2

Well-Known Member
Joined
Feb 9, 2018
Threads
2
Messages
647
Reaction score
436
Location
CA
First Name
Walt
Vehicle(s)
'92 LX 5.0 Vert, 2018 GT PP2
I’m new to Mustangs. Just a curiosity question. With the 12:1 compression ratio on these new engines, is 93 octane high enough? I assume everybody uses 93 octane for routine driving. Does the computer automatically adjust to whatever octane fuel we use? I’m not a gear head so excuse the naive question. I’m used to muscle cars from the ‘60s and without adjusting the timing my GTO (10.5:1) detonates on anything less than 93 octane and adjusting the timing isn’t the ideal way to get rid of detonation. I could use some educating on this issue... Bruce
Your unmodded 2018 mustang will run just fine on 87 octane fuel, it just won't achieve full potential horsepower.

Screenshot_20181129-173815.png
Sponsored

 
 








Top