Sponsored

5.4 stroker coyote ?

BlackandBlue

Well-Known Member
Joined
Jun 27, 2019
Threads
17
Messages
871
Reaction score
833
Location
Texas
Vehicle(s)
Mustang
My question is how much of the lower pistons skirt would be out of the block at bottom dead center on a stroked Coyote? As more skirt "sticks" out of the bore, the more the piston can tilt/rock = more wear and friction. Skirt support is critical for any engine, and this is especially so in a stroked motor.

5.5 Coyote, heck yea', I'm all for extra cubes, nothing like more torque.

I have a very low mileage complete 2019 5.0 Coyote I am gong to build, so I'm very interested in more cubes.
I am with you on the skirt length. Ford increased bore from the 5.0 to 5.2 for a reason verses stroking the motor for a few reasons.

1. Skirt dept to shallow causing piston slap/rubbing.
2. Oversquare engines are not good for long flat torque curves. Torque peaks much sooner.
3. Ring speeds are much higher with oversquare engines. Light pistons are also needed if the same redline is to be maintained. Rod and crank forces will always be higher.
4. Heat generated from higher piston/ring speeds as not good for boosted applications due to the higher cylinder temps from friction. Detonation is an unwelcome side effect.
5. High parasitic loss due to higher ring friction.
6. Shorter ring life.

I would be careful playing with boosted undersquare engines.
Sponsored

 
OP
OP
olaosunt

olaosunt

Well-Known Member
Joined
Jan 10, 2015
Threads
72
Messages
4,291
Reaction score
1,575
Location
Indiana
Vehicle(s)
Guard,base,M6,KB-2.DIB,auto,Hellion TT,2016 GT 350/Gen 3 Whipple ,2018 Mustang GT/Gen 5 Whipple
I am with you on the skirt length. Ford increased bore from the 5.0 to 5.2 for a reason verses stroking the motor for a few reasons.

1. Skirt dept to shallow causing piston slap/rubbing.
2. Oversquare engines are not good for long flat torque curves. Torque peaks much sooner.
3. Ring speeds are much higher with oversquare engines. Light pistons are also needed if the same redline is to be maintained. Rod and crank forces will always be higher.
4. Heat generated from higher piston/ring speeds as not good for boosted applications due to the higher cylinder temps from friction. Detonation is an unwelcome side effect.
5. High parasitic loss due to higher ring friction.
6. Shorter ring life.

I would be careful playing with boosted undersquare engines.
Gulp ! May be not so nice .
...and I thought you were my “friend” when you were encouraging me to build one .lol
More like my “Huckleberry “.
 

engineermike

Well-Known Member
Joined
Jul 15, 2018
Threads
31
Messages
6,197
Reaction score
6,474
Location
La
Vehicle(s)
2018 GTPP A10
Keep in mind that even the most ridiculous stroke length we’re talking about (3.9”) is still much shorter than the stock 5.4/5.8.
 

DavidHuff

Well-Known Member
Joined
Jul 18, 2016
Threads
92
Messages
1,405
Reaction score
325
Location
Salem,OR
Vehicle(s)
2017 5.0
Oh yeah brotha mine exited stage left in dramatic fashion!

My fault really, I was showing off for a buddy on about 15 psi with less than 1/4 tank of fuel.

Went lean and munched #3 piston.

Moral of story... DO NOT beat on your car with any less than 1/2 tank!



87-E7486-F-0-BB3-4808-A771-C093898440-AA.webp


9-EFCD1-B6-9-A4-C-4-DA0-B6-CF-11-CBA8-CBC4-D9.webp
Good Luck with your new build,were you able so save your stock heads?Post some pictures of your new motor build.
 

bauern

Well-Known Member
Joined
Aug 25, 2018
Threads
0
Messages
390
Reaction score
280
Location
somewhere else
First Name
Robert
Vehicle(s)
F150 Powerboost

Sponsored

gimmie11s

Well-Known Member
Joined
Mar 2, 2018
Threads
7
Messages
1,847
Reaction score
1,481
Location
SoCal
Vehicle(s)
Murica!
Good Luck with your new build,were you able so save your stock heads?Post some pictures of your new motor build.
Thanks... I’ll definitely start a thread once I tear into it. I haven’t pulled heads yet but fingers crossed on that passenger side! Drivers side will be fine.
 

bauern

Well-Known Member
Joined
Aug 25, 2018
Threads
0
Messages
390
Reaction score
280
Location
somewhere else
First Name
Robert
Vehicle(s)
F150 Powerboost
Keep in mind that even the most ridiculous stroke length we’re talking about (3.9”) is still much shorter than the stock 5.4/5.8.
Those blocks have higher deck heights. For a stroker Coyote/Voodoo you'll need longer rods,shorter pistons. The piston has a height of 1.168 - 1.174 depending on generation so the pin will be in the oil ring at least. Mathematically, the piston is ~.012 below the deck so you might have some room there but you'll be eating up piston to valve clearance.
 
OP
OP
olaosunt

olaosunt

Well-Known Member
Joined
Jan 10, 2015
Threads
72
Messages
4,291
Reaction score
1,575
Location
Indiana
Vehicle(s)
Guard,base,M6,KB-2.DIB,auto,Hellion TT,2016 GT 350/Gen 3 Whipple ,2018 Mustang GT/Gen 5 Whipple
The Gen 3 has a much more open deck than the Predator block. https://performanceparts.ford.com/part/M-6010-M504VC
The Gen 3 has a much more open deck than the Predator block. https://performanceparts.ford.com/part/M-6010-M504VC
Thanks man . I know you had a lot of experience with these builds but I can’t really see the difference based on the pics on the website .

Also any thoughts on using a coyote crank vs the longer stroke predator /ford racing crank in a 5.2 CP build ?

I know the stroke is 0.012 shorter , and as you pointed out the piston will be below the deck .
Also I expect 11.9 vs 12.1 compression and 3 cu inches less (which I doubt I will notice on a mostly street car ) with the coyote crank , but is there any difference in the strength (both fillet rolled ?)
Thanks
6BD414E9-B640-4407-BA73-108371B93EA0.webp
FF90AC9D-C6CA-47F8-B8A3-D0F1E41149B6.webp
 
OP
OP
olaosunt

olaosunt

Well-Known Member
Joined
Jan 10, 2015
Threads
72
Messages
4,291
Reaction score
1,575
Location
Indiana
Vehicle(s)
Guard,base,M6,KB-2.DIB,auto,Hellion TT,2016 GT 350/Gen 3 Whipple ,2018 Mustang GT/Gen 5 Whipple
Here is real life pic of a predator block .
I believe it’s the same as the Gen 3. 5.2/voodoo.

Below that is a pic comparing the “Gen 2 “ voodoo to the Gen 1 .
I think the only difference between Gen 2 and 3 voodoo is the oil squirters that come with 3.
89530793-6EE9-41EF-BAC4-4272B71DA643.webp
5FDE0AC7-9125-4D30-B719-E9E63DE02656.webp
 

bauern

Well-Known Member
Joined
Aug 25, 2018
Threads
0
Messages
390
Reaction score
280
Location
somewhere else
First Name
Robert
Vehicle(s)
F150 Powerboost
Thanks man . I know you had a lot of experience with these builds but I can’t really see the difference based on the pics on the website .

Also any thoughts on using a coyote crank vs the longer stroke predator /ford racing crank in a 5.2 CP build ?

I know the stroke is 0.012 shorter , and as you pointed out the piston will be below the deck .
Also I expect 11.9 vs 12.1 compression and 3 cu inches less (which I doubt I will notice on a mostly street car ) with the coyote crank , but is there any difference in the strength (both fillet rolled ?)
You'll loose some quench but you can play with the tune.
For a street build it's tough to justify the 5.2 crank. The difference is 8 c.i. 5.2L (315 c.i.) vs. Gen 3 (307 c.i.).
 

Sponsored
OP
OP
olaosunt

olaosunt

Well-Known Member
Joined
Jan 10, 2015
Threads
72
Messages
4,291
Reaction score
1,575
Location
Indiana
Vehicle(s)
Guard,base,M6,KB-2.DIB,auto,Hellion TT,2016 GT 350/Gen 3 Whipple ,2018 Mustang GT/Gen 5 Whipple
You'll loose some quench but you can play with the tune.
For a street build it's tough to justify the 5.2 crank. The difference is 8 c.i. 5.2L (315 c.i.) vs. Gen 3 (307 c.i.).
Thanks man . That’s answer I have been looking for . Lol
I also read about the loss of “quench “ with slightly shorter stroke crank but it’s good to know the tune could take care of that .
I also thought with the longer stroke crank (3.661) you got 317 C.I (a true 5.2 ) versus 314 C.I(5.15) with the coyote crank(3.649) ?
 

engineermike

Well-Known Member
Joined
Jul 15, 2018
Threads
31
Messages
6,197
Reaction score
6,474
Location
La
Vehicle(s)
2018 GTPP A10
.... The piston has a height of 1.168 - 1.174 depending on generation so the pin will be in the oil ring at least.....
I wouldn’t recommend running the pin in the oil ring, which is where the 5.85” rods come in, as pointed out earlier.
 
OP
OP
olaosunt

olaosunt

Well-Known Member
Joined
Jan 10, 2015
Threads
72
Messages
4,291
Reaction score
1,575
Location
Indiana
Vehicle(s)
Guard,base,M6,KB-2.DIB,auto,Hellion TT,2016 GT 350/Gen 3 Whipple ,2018 Mustang GT/Gen 5 Whipple
Is the top one the KR3z-6010 or M-6010-M52B?
The top one is the KR3Z-6010-A . I think the M-6010-M52B is just the Ford racing version .

The one below (in the pic comparing to Gen 1 )is the M-6010-M52A - Gen 2 .
That is what RPG used to build the block that Is in my Hellion car .
I believe it’s the same as the GR3Z-6010-F (E is discontinued)which may be what they are using in the Voodoo/GT350.
That’s the one I ordered for my build
It’s a few hundred cheaper than the KR3Z-6010.
A6677D88-F443-4BE6-8B2E-594CA9F19B1D.jpeg
Sponsored

 
 








Top