Sponsored

GT350 Shipping weight

Nataphen

Well-Known Member
Joined
Nov 17, 2014
Threads
4
Messages
1,063
Reaction score
301
Location
DFW
Vehicle(s)
2013 Mustang GT
Where are they finding ~100lbs. to lose versus the GTPP? thePill, any insight?
Sponsored

 

ihc95

Well-Known Member
Joined
Jul 16, 2014
Threads
15
Messages
812
Reaction score
706
Location
NJ
Vehicle(s)
2018 GTPP A10 401A
Where are they finding ~100lbs. to lose versus the GTPP? thePill, any insight?
The engine is slightly lighter. The front end support/grill is made from carbon fiber. The non-R wheels are probably a few pounds lighter per corner. I'd imagine they saved some weight with the exhaust system. Also, they could've removed some sound deadening.
 
OP
OP

65Terdlingua

Well-Known Member
Joined
Apr 29, 2015
Threads
3
Messages
297
Reaction score
203
Location
Kansas City
Vehicle(s)
1965 Mustang
The engine is slightly lighter. The front end support/grill is made from carbon fiber. The non-R wheels are probably a few pounds lighter per corner. I'd imagine they saved some weight with the exhaust system. Also, they could've removed some sound deadening.
Also aluminum knuckles and lighter bearing assemblies I believe.
 

Grimace427

Well-Known Member
Joined
Dec 6, 2013
Threads
14
Messages
6,470
Reaction score
1,699
Location
NoVA
Vehicle(s)
2011 Mustang 5.0
Also aluminum knuckles and lighter bearing assemblies I believe.

Yes and probably worth about 10lbs total, which in the grand scheme might not sound like much but will make a huge difference when actually driving being that the knuckles are unsprung weight.
 

DrumReaper

Well-Known Member
Joined
May 17, 2015
Threads
114
Messages
4,985
Reaction score
3,706
Location
South East
Vehicle(s)
1971 429CJ Mach 1, 2012 Boss 302
Yes and probably worth about 10lbs total, which in the grand scheme might not sound like much but will make a huge difference when actually driving being that the knuckles are unsprung weight.

Add that to the wheels on the 350 being lighter than the standard GTPP and that's a considerable amount of less heft the suspension has to shock and dampen... would make traction better, steering effort lighter and suspension response time much quicker.
 

Sponsored

Grimace427

Well-Known Member
Joined
Dec 6, 2013
Threads
14
Messages
6,470
Reaction score
1,699
Location
NoVA
Vehicle(s)
2011 Mustang 5.0
Add that to the wheels on the 350 being lighter than the standard GTPP and that's a considerable amount of less heft the suspension has to shock and dampen...

Don't know for sure if the standard GT350 wheels are lighter than the GT/PP.
 

1320'

Well-Known Member
Joined
Aug 26, 2014
Threads
19
Messages
3,758
Reaction score
1,616
Location
Medford,Oregon
Vehicle(s)
2011 Avenger...sadly
Also no real interior. No AC, no back seat, no real stereo. No AC has to be damn near 70lbs.
That's the 350R.

The 350 itself is lighter, but we don't really know by how much.

The 350 uses carbon fiber composites in the front end, more aluminum, the engine itself is lighter by metal, the oil pan is a composite material also.
 

fuhrius

Well-Known Member
Joined
Jun 1, 2015
Threads
11
Messages
810
Reaction score
604
Location
Los Gatos, CA
Vehicle(s)
GT350R, Focus RS, Raptor
I just pulled up the actual invoice for the 2015 GT350R that we're getting at the dealership I work for and it shows a shipping weight of 3566 lbs, so your theory is wrong, sorry to say.
does that R have the electronics package on it?
 

DrumReaper

Well-Known Member
Joined
May 17, 2015
Threads
114
Messages
4,985
Reaction score
3,706
Location
South East
Vehicle(s)
1971 429CJ Mach 1, 2012 Boss 302
Don't know for sure if the standard GT350 wheels are lighter than the GT/PP.

Go purvey the CF thread... there is some interesting info in there. I am merely assuming that, but indeed the wheels on the 350R are lighter and will act as stated.
 

Sponsored

cjgt350

Adrenaline Junkie
Joined
May 29, 2015
Threads
27
Messages
864
Reaction score
485
Location
Central OK
Vehicle(s)
2014 F250 Platinum 2016 GT350 TP
Yet they are still using the heavy arse two piece steel DS. SMH... When I upgraded my GT500 to a CF one piece DS I dropped 38lbs rotational mass which helped engine acceleration and actually increased rwhp slightly. It was definitely noticeable while driving. I think I found another needed upgrade.

 

matrix243

Well-Known Member
Joined
Jan 12, 2015
Threads
2
Messages
151
Reaction score
21
Location
Canada
Vehicle(s)
Raptor & Lightning
Some people spend a significant chunk of time worrying about or speculating about a comparison between the gt350 and the z28. Nothing wrong with that! However both cars have performance capabilities that so far exceed my personal skill set that it's pretty much irrelevant in my little world. I know that on very rare occasion I may push my gt350 to 80% of it's abilities. At which time I will be exceeding my driving by about 10%.

If the Z28 is a slightly better car, that really won't affect the big, fat, giant, poop eating grin plastered across my face!!! If you are a highly skilled guy who tracks your car and are likely to run up against other really skilled drivers with z28's I get it! For me, I'm a mustang guy. This is, in my opinion, going to be the best mustang to date. Happy Happy!
It's purely bragging rights. Ford has to win one of these battles eventually. It seems like chevy has one upped on every model run.
 

Mystic_Cobra

Well-Known Member
Joined
Aug 20, 2013
Threads
5
Messages
394
Reaction score
57
Location
Northern VA
Vehicle(s)
2017 RR GT350, '65 Mustang Coupe
It is also worth noting, actual and honest fuel levels dictate. I have seen previous Invoices list the exact amount of gallons added to the car being shipped as well as cost of that fuel.

The GT350 above had $40 in fuel added. Are GT350's shipped with fuel? Maybe to stop dealers from adding in cheap 87.
Why would the manufacturer care what fuel a dealer added? The computer detunes the engine as necessary for the fuel. Any enthusiast who cares about the weight of a car or modding a car is going to put the right fuel it in once they get it.
 

cjgt350

Adrenaline Junkie
Joined
May 29, 2015
Threads
27
Messages
864
Reaction score
485
Location
Central OK
Vehicle(s)
2014 F250 Platinum 2016 GT350 TP
It's purely bragging rights. Ford has to win one of these battles eventually. It seems like chevy has one upped on every model run.

Wait a second....chronologically....(07-12) GT500 rained supreme for nearly 5 years in the HP wars then 2012 ZL1 for 30 days LOL then '13-14 GT500, Boss 302 then Z28 now GT350. Now who is trying to catch who? Bottom line competition is good and we all win. Ford having to win one of these battles...hardly.... they have won plenty.
 

Grimace427

Well-Known Member
Joined
Dec 6, 2013
Threads
14
Messages
6,470
Reaction score
1,699
Location
NoVA
Vehicle(s)
2011 Mustang 5.0
Also no real interior. No AC, no back seat, no real stereo. No AC has to be damn near 70lbs.
The GT350R is quoted as 130lbs lighter than the GT350 with TP.

That's the 350R.

The 350 itself is lighter, but we don't really know by how much.

The 350 uses carbon fiber composites in the front end, more aluminum, the engine itself is lighter by metal, the oil pan is a composite material also.

The standard GT350 does have some weight reduction but also adds some weight back with it's huge brakes, perhaps the MRC is heavier(not sure), Tremec 3160 might be heavier than the MT-82, heavier axle shafts, maybe a few more things.
Sponsored

 
 




Top