Sponsored

FFTEC's EFR Turbo System: ~24PSI Dyno Numbers

Status
Not open for further replies.

Anthony@FFtec

Vendor
Joined
Nov 22, 2014
Threads
10
Messages
131
Reaction score
156
Location
Bay Area CA
Vehicle(s)
IS300
On a whim, today we took the opportunity to strap our MEB onto a friends Dynojet :D. We were having some issues with tach pick-up, and it is reflective in the dyno plot vs. Engine RPM. As such, plots against speed are also shown.

All tests were performed in 4th gear, near back to back.

At ~24PSI we were able to make 410HP uncorrected. With the .98 SAE correction factor (and smoothing) we were brought back down to 403HP. We have currently opted to mitigate overall TQ output on the chassis, but keep in mind we have taken the TQ well (and we do mean WELL) into the 400's; more information on that to come later :clap2:.

All these tests were performed without calibration changes between them. We just allowed the OAR do do its thing as it learned the octane rating of the freshly pumped fuel. The 91ACN that was in the car (and still some remnant of) never seems to yield consistent/comparable results; as most of you know. :cool:

The car is currently configured with a small frame BW EFR turbocharger. This is a T4 twin scroll turbo that has an internal wastegate. Our turbo manifold does retain the cylinder divides, keeping the system 100% true to its OE twin scroll design. The chassis is also equipped with our EcoCore intercooler, and calibrated using a COBB Accessport by our team of calibration specialist.

Chassis setup breakdown
  • FFTEC Turbo System -- Utilizing a small frame BorgWarner EFR turbo
  • FFTEC EcoCore intercooler
  • FFTEC Chargepipe system
  • FFTEC Intake System
  • FFTEC Downpipe
  • FFTEC Exhaust System
  • Custom Accessport calibration by FFTEC's Calibration staff
We don't have 93 octane fuel here in CA, so we opted to run 94 octane for our test. The fuel is local and available from the pump.

Here are the results. All SAE corrected with a smoothing factor of 5:





The original calibration was performed on 91ACN, and the fuel forces us to "proceed with caution" at every step. After seeing these plots for the first time on a DJ, we plan to make some revisions and hit the dyno again soon!
Sponsored

 

04SloSnake

Boost Addict
Joined
Nov 11, 2014
Threads
4
Messages
1,511
Reaction score
464
Location
Japan / Germany
Vehicle(s)
R34 Skyline
This is great news.
 

Papaya

Well-Known Member
Joined
Aug 3, 2014
Threads
11
Messages
1,217
Reaction score
82
Location
Stony Plain, Alberta
First Name
Holger
Vehicle(s)
F150 2.7 EcoBoost
Wow! 400 HP? :faint: And only bold on parts? That's getting interesting now. Thanks for sharing.
 

RubyRacer

Well-Known Member
Joined
Apr 23, 2014
Threads
15
Messages
447
Reaction score
163
Location
PA
Vehicle(s)
22 Mustang GT 6M
As long as the fuel system and stock rods hold, this may end up being my setup!
 

Juben

Well-Known Member
Joined
Jan 29, 2015
Threads
35
Messages
2,519
Reaction score
809
Location
Chattanooga, TN
First Name
Justin
Vehicle(s)
2015 EcoBoost Mustang (AT) w/PP
What was the fueling looking like, e.g. injector duty cycle, fuel rail pressure?

Sent from my Nexus 5 using Tapatalk
 

Sponsored

wireless

Well-Known Member
Joined
Nov 29, 2014
Threads
7
Messages
496
Reaction score
66
Location
Irving, TX
First Name
David
Vehicle(s)
Oxford White Ecoboost Premium
Excellent. How much more can you get out of this turbo? Is it able to go higher, or is this the limit?

Depending on this, I'd be very interested :D :D
 

dragonacc

Well-Known Member
Joined
Aug 20, 2013
Threads
13
Messages
1,667
Reaction score
411
Location
TN
Vehicle(s)
2015 Ecoboost PP
7163? Or smaller? Looks like it's still spooling really fast.
 

bluestang50

Well-Known Member
Joined
Oct 31, 2014
Threads
6
Messages
289
Reaction score
135
Location
GA
Vehicle(s)
2017 F150, 2020 Explorer ST, 1990 Mustang GT turbo
I can not wait to see final numbers and a kit price!
 

cosmo

Well-Known Member
Joined
Sep 22, 2014
Threads
19
Messages
1,770
Reaction score
765
Location
Michigan
Vehicle(s)
2005 Mustang GT
This is awesome, looking forward to how all this ends up looking. I'm guessing the turbo will be around 2500-3500 bucks total, which is very reasonable.
 

David@FFtec

Well-Known Member
Joined
Dec 21, 2014
Threads
3
Messages
144
Reaction score
96
Location
SF Bay Area
First Name
David
Vehicle(s)
1992 Eagle Talon, Porsche 944 Turbo
7163? Or smaller? Looks like it's still spooling really fast.
Yes, it's the 7163. It builds ten psi at just 2k rpm so you can keep it in 6th gear on the freeway, no need to downshift. I also like how it makes peak power up at 6200 rpm, it has a broad powerband.
 

Sponsored

dragonacc

Well-Known Member
Joined
Aug 20, 2013
Threads
13
Messages
1,667
Reaction score
411
Location
TN
Vehicle(s)
2015 Ecoboost PP
Yes, it's the 7163. It builds ten psi at just 2k rpm so you can keep it in 6th gear on the freeway, no need to downshift. I also like how it makes peak power up at 6200 rpm, it's a broad powerband.
Where do you see the 7163 maxing out on this motor? Supposed to be 550-600 hp right? Wonder if I'll need to step up to a 7670 when I get ready to swap turbos... :p
 

David@FFtec

Well-Known Member
Joined
Dec 21, 2014
Threads
3
Messages
144
Reaction score
96
Location
SF Bay Area
First Name
David
Vehicle(s)
1992 Eagle Talon, Porsche 944 Turbo
Where do you see the 7163 maxing out on this motor? Supposed to be 550-600 hp right? Wonder if I'll need to step up to a 7670 when I get ready to swap turbos... :p
We haven't seen any signs of reaching the limit yet. The wastegate still has plenty of range and boost levels are mild. Borg-Warner rates it at 550HP so there's more in it.
 

RubyRedBoost

Traded EB old name New GT
Joined
Dec 10, 2014
Threads
10
Messages
619
Reaction score
181
Location
Fort Worth
First Name
Josh
Vehicle(s)
2015 Guard GT with PP
If the turbo isnt infact maxed out and you are monitoring the torque output is this why it dies out up top? Definitely a lot better plot with the upgraded snail but torque still drops to 275. It'd be nice to see a nice flat curve.
 

dragonacc

Well-Known Member
Joined
Aug 20, 2013
Threads
13
Messages
1,667
Reaction score
411
Location
TN
Vehicle(s)
2015 Ecoboost PP
We haven't seen any signs of reaching the limit yet. The wastegate still has plenty of range and boost levels are mild. Borg-Warner rates it at 550HP so there's more in it.

Sounds good, is this with the upgraded rods and pistons too?
 

cosmo

Well-Known Member
Joined
Sep 22, 2014
Threads
19
Messages
1,770
Reaction score
765
Location
Michigan
Vehicle(s)
2005 Mustang GT
If the turbo isnt infact maxed out and you are monitoring the torque output is this why it dies out up top? Definitely a lot better plot with the upgraded snail but torque still drops to 275. It'd be nice to see a nice flat curve.
It seems everyone starts to lose torque around 5500, either it's a fueling issue at higher RPMs with the pump being insufficient at that flow rate, or possibly an issue with something in the powertrain operating at higher power in the higher RPM range? Anyway, some insight from one of these companies would be awesome.
Sponsored

 
Status
Not open for further replies.
 








Top