2028 Camaro 7th Gen is Coming

[geep81]

And Ford didn't cheap out implementing DI. They kept port injection as well to reduce maintenance issues.

I think the main complaint about DI is that it could have been built to be quieter.

I know that would increase costs, but that's my take. If the 2k rattle didn't exist a lot of complaints would go away. People want their v8s to purr not rattle.

Sponsored

 

[Bob Lob Law]

Agreed. The 6.2 failures in the cars are on track though. Where everything is a consumable. The 6.2 in trucks, different story.

From what I've read and understand, is it is also the truck 6.2. They had full stop sale of all 6.2L vehicles for the model year 2024 in late April of 2025. To include trucks and SUVs.

 

[martinjlm]

To be fair, most "issues" with the Coyote are people complain about noises. The 6.2 actually has significant frequency of catastrophic failure of lifters and main bearings. The Coyote has been by far much more reliable from an engine failure standpoint.

And Ford didn't cheap out implementing DI. They kept port injection as well to reduce maintenance issues. I don't like DI, but you are not going to prevent carbon buildup without retaining port injection.

Agreed. The 6.2 failures in the cars are on track though. Where everything is a consumable. The 6.2 in trucks, different story.

My point is, the architecture of the motor, how water was designed to flow, how oil returns to the pan, the baffling in the pan, the OPGs, I think GM does a better job with those than Ford. Ford used inferred temps on so much, rather than just putting a temp sensor in.

Part of the complication, compared to a pushrod V8 IMO, is because of the DOHC set up. Don't get me wrong, I am all for the DOHC. BUT...it's a totally different world from pushrods.

For the most part both you guys are right. You're just shopping in different aisles. The GM lifter issue is directly related to the implementation of AFM. All 6.2L got the AFM lifters whether the vehicle has AFM implemented or not. Sorta like all 6.2L have hardened valve trains to support FlexFuel whether they actually are specced for FlexFuel or not. Makes build sequencing in the engine plant a lot easier.

The incidence of lifter failure is highly over-blown because, let's face it...people don't get on car forums and say "my lifters didn't drop!" We only hear the horror stories. I have a friend who's had it happen twice on the same car. I know no one else who has ever had the problem. And I'm president of a large Camaro Club so I know A LOT of people with Camaros. People who drive them hard.

As for Ford including DI and PFI on the same engines, that was not done for maintenance. It was done for emissions. DI technology is "borrowed" from diesel technologies. One of the results of this is that a by-product of DI combustion is high nitrous oxide emissions at startup and at low speed. There are two ways to deal with this. NOx traps or include PFI. Ford chose to go PFI, probably because PFI brings added performance advantages on the high end where the engine may be starved for fuel. GM added PFI to the 5.5L DOHC and is adding it to the new 6.7L engines primarily for performance since they had already handled the emissions aspect of it in the LT1 / L87 engines.

 

[martinjlm]

From what I've read and understand, is it is also the truck 6.2. They had full stop sale of all 6.2L vehicles for the model year 2024 in late April of 2025. To include trucks and SUVs.

It wasn't because of lifter problems. There was a supplier problem with bearings.

 

[WItoTX]

It wasn't because of lifter problems. There was a supplier problem with bearings.

Oddly, seems like Toyota trucks are suffering through a similar problem.

 

[martinjlm]

At a press event discussing the 2027 Corvette lineup, Corvette Chief Engineer Josh Holder provided some details on the LS6 engine. Top right corner. 535 hp, 520 lb-ft.

Expect Camaro to get the same engine, same output. GM has stopped playing the de-rating game when putting Corvette engines in Camaros because...

1. Sometimes the exhaust routing differences manage the Camaro hp to a few hp less than the Corvette without any unnecessary manipulation.
2. The Corvette is so much lighter than Camaro, and now with mid-engine, capable of putting more of that hp to effectives use that it doesn't matter.
3. At the Executive Chief Engineer level, the Corvette Chief Engineer and the Camaro Chief Engineer report to the same person (Tony Roma).

 

[HKusp]

For the most part both you guys are right. You're just shopping in different aisles. The GM lifter issue is directly related to the implementation of AFM. All 6.2L got the AFM lifters whether the vehicle has AFM implemented or not. Sorta like all 6.2L have hardened valve trains to support FlexFuel whether they actually are specced for FlexFuel or not. Makes build sequencing in the engine plant a lot easier.

The incidence of lifter failure is highly over-blown because, let's face it...people don't get on car forums and say "my lifters didn't drop!" We only hear the horror stories. I have a friend who's had it happen twice on the same car. I know no one else who has ever had the problem. And I'm president of a large Camaro Club so I know A LOT of people with Camaros. People who drive them hard.

As for Ford including DI and PFI on the same engines, that was not done for maintenance. It was done for emissions. DI technology is "borrowed" from diesel technologies. One of the results of this is that a by-product of DI combustion is high nitrous oxide emissions at startup and at low speed. There are two ways to deal with this. NOx traps or include PFI. Ford chose to go PFI, probably because PFI brings added performance advantages on the high end where the engine may be starved for fuel. GM added PFI to the 5.5L DOHC and is adding it to the new 6.7L engines primarily for performance since they had already handled the emissions aspect of it in the LT1 / L87 engines.

The coyotes with DI use almost exclusively DI in order to start, though, so that's kind of weird.

 

[Balr14]

The last article I read indicated the Camaro will be a 4 door using the same platform as the current Cadillac CT4/CT5, which are getting a new platform.

 

[robvas]

The last article I read indicated the Camaro will be a 4 door using the same platform as the current Cadillac CT4/CT5, which are getting a new platform.

Thats what the every first post in this thread links to

 

[Balr14]

Thats what the every first post in this thread links to

The links in the first post seemed to leave the possibility open that the new Camaro could be a coupe. The articles I read made it clear it will have 4 doors. Also it indicated that Mustang will have a competing model. Both of these would occur in 2029.

 

[MAGS1]

The links in the first post seemed to leave the possibility open that the new Camaro could be a coupe. The articles I read made it clear it will have 4 doors. Also it indicated that Mustang will have a competing model. Both of these would occur in 2029.

Everything I’ve seen lately has been 4 door Camaro. CT5V-BW also appears to be coming back for a 2nd generation, GM has not confirmed yet

https://www.caranddriver.com/news/a73218061/cadillac-ct5-v-blackwing-successor-report/

 

[martinjlm]

Everything I’ve seen lately has been 4 door Camaro. CT5V-BW also appears to be coming back for a 2nd generation, GM has not confirmed yet

https://www.caranddriver.com/news/a73218061/cadillac-ct5-v-blackwing-successor-report/

Actually, the CT5 V BW has been pretty much confirmed. GM has said there will be a next generation CT5 and that it would include a V8 and a manual transmission. Sounds like BW.

 

[9secondko]

Based on the ford noise, sounds like they’re both soing a coupe and a 4 door.

wish they’d wise up and call them something unique. Can still save money on the shared platform, just add a new fascia, a new badge, and boom. Success.

Otherwise, it’s polarizing for no reason.

I’d say ford shoukd go for the Falcon or thunderbird nameplate for the four doir, but I don’t think this market would go for thst. A bit too napoleon dynamite for the current crowd methinks. Might be interpreted along the lines of “the new Chevy Liger” or something. LOL

Might need a new name. But with all the “SC” going around lately, I don’t think naming is a strong suit anymore.
Although I do kinda wish that Ford would have called them something unique dark horse SC “warhorse” instead. If they weren’t going with the Cobra or GT500.

whst would you guys call the four door if you could influence the nameplate?

 

[SheepDog]

BMW has been doing this for quite a while. M3 was originally only a 2 door. Then came the 4 door M3. Then BMW decided that the M4 should be the two door. Who cares. As long as we have options, and that Ford (or whatever manufacturer) keeps catering to enthusiasts, they can call it whatever they want

 

[2020 MagneticPP1]

BMW has been doing this for quite a while. M3 was originally only a 2 door. Then came the 4 door M3. Then BMW decided that the M4 should be the two door. Who cares. As long as we have options, and that Ford (or whatever manufacturer) keeps catering to enthusiasts, they can call it whatever they want

PERFECTLY said!

Sponsored