Sponsored

Working on a dual intake?

GregO

Well-Known Member
Joined
Mar 5, 2018
Threads
41
Messages
3,320
Reaction score
2,470
Location
Illinois
Vehicle(s)
S550 GTPP
Rear manifold pix looks like a scroll type common plenum.
Sponsored

 

Jaymar

Well-Known Member
Joined
Jun 15, 2018
Threads
3
Messages
1,221
Reaction score
1,436
Location
Portland, OR
First Name
Jaymar
Vehicle(s)
2022 GT/CS - Rapid Red
Yeah, I don't know how many ITB comparisons you can make. That still looks like a plenum with runners on it they just slapped two TBs on the front instead. Given it's Ford, we should be lucky it isn't an '18 manifold cut and glued back together.
 

4V Mayhem

Well-Known Member
Joined
May 20, 2016
Threads
9
Messages
1,368
Reaction score
529
Location
US
Vehicle(s)
2015 Mustang GT Premium M6
Yeah, I don't know how many ITB comparisons you can make. That still looks like a plenum with runners on it they just slapped two TBs on the front instead. Given it's Ford, we should be lucky it isn't an '18 manifold cut and glued back together.
Don't give them any ideas man.
 

tdstuart

Well-Known Member
Joined
Apr 6, 2021
Threads
72
Messages
2,566
Reaction score
1,292
Location
Arizona
First Name
Triston
Vehicle(s)
2015 Mustang Gt Premium
I want to preface with I am terrible at electrical stuff.

But, to make it work it would seem like you would have to combine the 2 maf signals into one and have the tb signals combined as well. Make the dual throttle bodies act as one.

You may even be able to have one throttle body act like a normal one and have a controller that reads rpm and pedal position to control the secondary like we think the 24+ Mustang will work. But that would require a lot more work.

I don't think it would be worth it for the s550 gen mustangs to try and use this setup. I think Ford chose to do this because they wanted a bigger throttle body for more power but also the control of a smaller throttle body for driveability. The smaller throttle body may even help with low-end torque. But to do it effectively like we already stated they will use one throttle body as the main and one as a helper in higher rpm to give more power. I think replicating that effect on the s550 mustang will be pretty hard. You will probably need a custom controller to control the second throttle body, which will need inputs from the ecu.

I think if you want the bigger throttle body you go cj setup.
 

Optimum Performance

Well-Known Member
Gold Sponsor
Joined
Mar 13, 2016
Threads
62
Messages
1,836
Reaction score
1,397
Location
Titusville, Florida
Website
www.facebook.com
First Name
Tommy
Vehicle(s)
'15 GT PP
It's a common plenum. Individual banked plenums only work on Flat Plane engines with equal firing. 2 smaller TB's offer much more resolution than one big one. It's 2023, you can now (still) buy a 500+ HP NA V8 car, as tighter emissions standards are legislated in for ICE. What OEM's are doing with power levels while meeting emissions and offering warranties is nothing short of amazing. There is so much investment to make this possible, decades of research dollars at the US's advanced research labs etc. People tend to make assumptions based on current technology and strategies, missing that existing sensors could be used for other purposes in the system.

Large prime power engines with big long crankshafts actually adjust what "TDC" is on the fly due to the multiple degrees of crankshaft twist present while under load. On a 24 cylinder engine the spread is huge. We learned by changing the gas pressure feeding them gave us better fuel control because we forced the valve to travel further so corrections were 10 times more precise. I believe this is the reason for 2 banks of induction, more precise, no airflow restrictions while meeting upcoming emission standards.
 

Sponsored

engineermike

Well-Known Member
Joined
Jul 15, 2018
Threads
31
Messages
6,189
Reaction score
6,454
Location
La
Vehicle(s)
2018 GTPP A10
Got my hands on the 2024 calibration. To my surprise the tb model looks just like a gen3 except there are two of them. That leads me to believe they just work in parallel. Logic determines flow required for desired torque, then calculates flow area required, then crosses that to a throttle angle on a lookup table x 2.
 

WildHorse

N/A or GO HOME
Joined
Jun 28, 2017
Threads
270
Messages
10,297
Reaction score
8,350
Location
Home World: CLASSIFIED
First Name
Puddintane
Vehicle(s)
'17 S550
Vehicle Showcase
1

engineermike

Well-Known Member
Joined
Jul 15, 2018
Threads
31
Messages
6,189
Reaction score
6,454
Location
La
Vehicle(s)
2018 GTPP A10
What else you want to know? I can say it is completely revamped vs the gen3. Shockingly so.
 

engineermike

Well-Known Member
Joined
Jul 15, 2018
Threads
31
Messages
6,189
Reaction score
6,454
Location
La
Vehicle(s)
2018 GTPP A10
Op cam angles are drastically different. Home/deenergized position isn’t at the same location for the intake cam, but even if you account for that it’s very different. For instance, the gen2 moves the intake cam 38 deg through the rpm range, gen3 is 44 deg. Gen4(?) only moves it 24 deg.

Pe lambda is basically the same.
 

Sponsored

Jasonb543

Well-Known Member
Joined
Aug 22, 2021
Threads
0
Messages
429
Reaction score
507
Location
Detroit
First Name
Jason
Vehicle(s)
1993 fox
Do you think there is some major gains to be unlocked on these gen 4s??
 

K4fxd

Well-Known Member
Joined
Apr 2, 2020
Threads
121
Messages
13,455
Reaction score
12,262
Location
NKY
First Name
Dan
Vehicle(s)
2017 gt, 2002 FXDWG, 2008 C6,

MAGS1

Well-Known Member
Joined
Mar 6, 2020
Threads
96
Messages
11,333
Reaction score
18,563
Location
Somewhere in Middle America
First Name
Mark
Vehicle(s)
2022 Mustang GT
With just a tune, I doubt it.
Sounds like Ford didn’t leave much on the table, similar to GM and the C8 Vette. Which is a good thing IMO. Give as much to the consumer as you can right out of the gate.
Sponsored

 
 








Top