GT 550
Well-Known Member
- Thread starter
- #1
Just wondering if anyone has installed these in preference to the normal RLCA mod.
https://www.suspension.com/superpro/spf4736k
Cheers
https://www.suspension.com/superpro/spf4736k
Cheers
Sponsored
Sponsored
moffetts
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Nov 30, 2015
- Threads
- 14
- Messages
- 978
- Reaction score
- 326
- Location
- San Mateo CA
- Vehicle(s)
- Black Whippled 2015 GT PP
There’s going to be a very short list of people who have done or are willing to do that job more than once.
Dave TBG
Patiently waiting...
- Joined
- Jun 10, 2018
- Threads
- 24
- Messages
- 597
- Reaction score
- 387
- Location
- New Jersey
- Vehicle(s)
- '19 EB 201A, '86 Porsche 944
I notice that these are for 15-17 but I don't see a listing for 18+. Does anyone know if these will fit 18+? Did this part change?
buttsy
Member
I have installed the following superpro bushes
Rear lower control arm
inner and outer camber
front castor
I also completed a number of other upgrades at the same time. So I cannot compare or comment on the differences between bearing or bushes. Prob the main reason for going with poly was the percieved longevity of the poly bushes. I was worried that the bearing may wear over time which would cause excessive play therefore noise. And then I would have to go through the process again. From my research, the poly should outlast the bearing. And still provide a far greater level of feedback and control than the standard rubber bushes. Perfect, I believe for my intended purpose. Which is spirited road use and 3 track days a year. No track use as of yet though. Harrop oil cooler needed.
I have no complaints as to how the car currently rides. Firm and controlled. But never Harsh. Road noise on coarse chip has actually been reduced from when I had only the BMR cradle lockout installed to an otherwise stock vehicle. Which I found interesting. Due to the ford track pack struts high speed compression valving and the superpro bushes I believe.
Rear lower control arm
inner and outer camber
front castor
I also completed a number of other upgrades at the same time. So I cannot compare or comment on the differences between bearing or bushes. Prob the main reason for going with poly was the percieved longevity of the poly bushes. I was worried that the bearing may wear over time which would cause excessive play therefore noise. And then I would have to go through the process again. From my research, the poly should outlast the bearing. And still provide a far greater level of feedback and control than the standard rubber bushes. Perfect, I believe for my intended purpose. Which is spirited road use and 3 track days a year. No track use as of yet though. Harrop oil cooler needed.
I have no complaints as to how the car currently rides. Firm and controlled. But never Harsh. Road noise on coarse chip has actually been reduced from when I had only the BMR cradle lockout installed to an otherwise stock vehicle. Which I found interesting. Due to the ford track pack struts high speed compression valving and the superpro bushes I believe.
GT 550
Well-Known Member
- Thread starter
- #5
fyi folks since this thread was started the rlca bearing vs poly discussion is getting more air time here:
https://www.mustang6g.com/forums/threads/rlca-help-spherical-bearing-vs-poly-bushing.147189/
https://www.mustang6g.com/forums/threads/rlca-help-spherical-bearing-vs-poly-bushing.147189/
Brian@BMVK
Well-Known Member
Yes, but most of the bearing options fit far less tightly than the OEM bushing, so they should come out much easier.
Sponsored
