Sponsored

Recommendations for more power while staying N/A

jmeiers

Well-Known Member
Joined
Oct 27, 2018
Threads
43
Messages
624
Reaction score
370
Location
Northern Virginia
Vehicle(s)
2019 Mustang GT PP1/401A/A10
Vehicle Showcase
1
AFS Ported CJ, VMP 137, Steeda CJ closed intake, BMR lowering motor brackets = ~$2,500.

It's only money and if you don't have any extra money, you shouldn't be modding your car. Just put your stimulus payment towards helping these small businesses. And you can sell your stock intake, throttle body, and intake stuff to recoup some of the costs.
 

sabtaj1

Well-Known Member
Joined
Sep 11, 2019
Threads
31
Messages
1,156
Reaction score
1,334
Location
Bettendorf, IA
First Name
Jason
Vehicle(s)
2019 PP1 Mustang GT, 1965 Fairlane 500 wagon
No shit...? ;). Plus $92 shipping on that Tasca piece. Again 400 bucks I would be a buyer. Not so much @ $730.

I would also like the option to return it if I do not like the performance diff.
Plus like $40 in sales tax. LOL
 

Idaho2018GTPremium

Well-Known Member
Joined
Nov 20, 2018
Threads
20
Messages
1,550
Reaction score
1,407
Location
Idaho
Vehicle(s)
2021 Camaro ZL1 A10
Here is some data. Blue is the GT350 on the Graph. 8.7 is the GT350 60-130, and 9.12 is the 18 Mani setup.

Both set ups have been quicker. Both has seen a touch more MAF flow etc....but this was done on a hot and muggy FL day a few hours apart....as close to back to back as I can get. People can believe it or not, or find flaws in it...but its just what I do in an effort to go faster. The people who usually scoff at the stuff I do, are the ones who cannot make the same combos go as quick and fast as mine. I am sure people will rely on the published dyno articles over this, and that is fine.

This is manifold swap only. Supporting mods are 95mm ZR1 TB, JLT 120mm CAI and 2" LTH Longtubes. No tuning changes whatsoever. Ran the 18, came home swapped to GT350 and ran the GT350.

GT350 vs 18 Mani.png
GT350 60-130.webp
18 Mani 60-130.webp
Another question: What are the numbers in the table, units, etc. RPM is obvious, I'm referring to the first two columns, and how the hp difference is calculated. Thanks.
 

KellTrac

Well-Known Member
Joined
Dec 25, 2019
Threads
3
Messages
292
Reaction score
299
Location
Florida
Website
www.kelltrac.com
Vehicle(s)
All of them
No shit...? ;). Plus $92 shipping on that Tasca piece. Again 400 bucks I would be a buyer. Not so much @ $730.

I would also like the option to return it if I do not like the performance diff.
That would be from a lack of trying. I can get my local Ford dealers to price match and not charge shipping.

But yeah. Call it 700. Most think it's $1K+ to go GT350 manifold.

I wouldve paid 750 had I known what I do now.
 

Sponsored

KellTrac

Well-Known Member
Joined
Dec 25, 2019
Threads
3
Messages
292
Reaction score
299
Location
Florida
Website
www.kelltrac.com
Vehicle(s)
All of them
Another question: What are the numbers in the table, units, etc. RPM is obvious, I'm referring to the first two columns, and how the hp difference is calculated. Thanks.
MAF flow by lb/min. The common assumption is that it shows your horsepower. Many variables there - I am not claiming those are my HP #s...but I am showing the gain in flow comparisons. Same tune and same day etc...so it should be pretty close.

30lb/min = 300hp (1lb is roughly 10hp)

So flowing 38, changing a part and seeing 40....in theory would be 380hp and 400hp. Thats a 20hp gain. Again all rough stuff and not absolute.
 

Troy Carter

Well-Known Member
Joined
Sep 18, 2019
Threads
0
Messages
112
Reaction score
58
Location
Chicago
First Name
Troy
Vehicle(s)
2019 GT
I would also like the option to return it if I do not like the performance diff.
HAHA

I'd love that option on many things in life. Heck, I'd love it if they also paid me for my time to test it for them and formulate an opinion on it's worth.
 

Zinc03svt

Well-Known Member
Joined
Jun 3, 2018
Threads
30
Messages
2,337
Reaction score
1,272
Location
usa
Vehicle(s)
stang
HAHA

I'd love that option on many things in life. Heck, I'd love it if they also paid me for my time to test it for them and formulate an opinion on it's worth.
Lol. I doubt they would know it was actually used if you where careful and did not ding it up. ;).
 

Zinc03svt

Well-Known Member
Joined
Jun 3, 2018
Threads
30
Messages
2,337
Reaction score
1,272
Location
usa
Vehicle(s)
stang
I am not discounting what Kelltrac has done here, but I would need more data and from more than just one person to drop $700-800 bucks. My car has pulled 51.7 maf counts on stock 18 box and manifold.
 

Sponsored

Troy Carter

Well-Known Member
Joined
Sep 18, 2019
Threads
0
Messages
112
Reaction score
58
Location
Chicago
First Name
Troy
Vehicle(s)
2019 GT
I am not discounting what Kelltrac has done here, but I would need more data and from more than just one person to drop $700-800 bucks. My car has pulled 51.7 maf counts on stock 18 box and manifold.
I don't disagree that it's nice to see multiple data points but your maf reading alone doesn't mean anything compared to his. Different car, different maf housing, different tune. His data is key because it directly compares only an intake change with all the other stuff (maf housing, tune, etc.) being equal.

And, with a little research you can find other comparisons between different intakes. Some have been posted on this thread. Almost all of them require a little reading between the lines but it's out there. You could take Ford's word for it when you compare normal GT's to the Bullit considering the only real hard part change is the intake/tb and it gains 20hp.
 

Idaho2018GTPremium

Well-Known Member
Joined
Nov 20, 2018
Threads
20
Messages
1,550
Reaction score
1,407
Location
Idaho
Vehicle(s)
2021 Camaro ZL1 A10
I am not discounting what Kelltrac has done here, but I would need more data and from more than just one person to drop $700-800 bucks. My car has pulled 51.7 maf counts on stock 18 box and manifold.
I agree, it's a great data point, but is still just one person's experience. I thought I was set on just porting my stock ('18) manifold, now, I realize I have more research to do. That said, 4 car lengths from 60-130 mph is no joke.
 

Idaho2018GTPremium

Well-Known Member
Joined
Nov 20, 2018
Threads
20
Messages
1,550
Reaction score
1,407
Location
Idaho
Vehicle(s)
2021 Camaro ZL1 A10
I don't disagree that it's nice to see multiple data points but your maf reading alone doesn't mean anything compared to his. Different car, different maf housing, different tune. His data is key because it directly compares only an intake change with all the other stuff (maf housing, tune, etc.) being equal.

And, with a little research you can find other comparisons between different intakes. Some have been posted on this thread. Almost all of them require a little reading between the lines but it's out there. You could take Ford's word for it when you compare normal GT's to the Bullit considering the only real hard part change is the intake/tb and it gains 20hp.
Good points.
 

TEXAS HEAT

Well-Known Member
Joined
May 25, 2016
Threads
37
Messages
706
Reaction score
281
Location
TEXAS
Vehicle(s)
2019 Mustang GT PP1 A10
@KellTrac Have you done a direct comparison between the GT350 throttle body and your custom 95mm on the GT350 manifold? I'd like to see a back to back airflow and acceleration test of those two on the same manifold...
 

Zinc03svt

Well-Known Member
Joined
Jun 3, 2018
Threads
30
Messages
2,337
Reaction score
1,272
Location
usa
Vehicle(s)
stang
I agree, it's a great data point, but is still just one person's experience. I thought I was set on just porting my stock ('18) manifold, now, I realize I have more research to do. That said, 4 car lengths from 60-130 mph is no joke.
When looking at the just the dyno charts they do not show a 4 car length difference between the two power wise. ??? ;).

That would reflect at least 30-40 whp difference imo.
Sponsored

 
 








Top