Sponsored

Phenolic thermal spacer for PD

fmc_smt

Well-Known Member
Joined
Jun 4, 2018
Threads
38
Messages
1,262
Reaction score
2,399
Location
Cottonwood , Arizona
Vehicle(s)
2015 gt , 2015 Escape , 2015 F250
Vehicle Showcase
1
W
Well nuts. Thanks for clarifying, that would've been my preference. Next time 😜
What ? After a hot soak I might see 20 over , but after a minute or two down to 3 or so .........Oh wait I live in the centri world .:sunglasses::sunglasses::sunglasses:
Sponsored

 
OP
OP
Redfuzzbutt

Redfuzzbutt

Well-Known Member
Joined
Feb 10, 2021
Threads
10
Messages
174
Reaction score
339
Location
Northern AZ
First Name
John
Vehicle(s)
'17 Mustang GT
W

What ? After a hot soak I might see 20 over , but after a minute or two down to 3 or so .........Oh wait I live in the centri world .:sunglasses::sunglasses::sunglasses:
Not being funny but is there such a thing as IAT2 for centrifugal SCs, a way to measure the air temp after the compressor at or near the intake manifold? I've never really bothered to learn about it.
 

fmc_smt

Well-Known Member
Joined
Jun 4, 2018
Threads
38
Messages
1,262
Reaction score
2,399
Location
Cottonwood , Arizona
Vehicle(s)
2015 gt , 2015 Escape , 2015 F250
Vehicle Showcase
1
Iat is measured at the maf , in my set up that would be the right tank of the cac . Cold side if you will . Since it is an air to air cooler , the charge is cooled . With that said , no centris don't have an iat 2 . Basically iat would be iat in your set up .
 

robvas

Well-Known Member
Joined
Nov 18, 2023
Threads
4
Messages
1,760
Reaction score
1,596
Location
MI
Vehicle(s)
2011 GT
Not being funny but is there such a thing as IAT2 for centrifugal SCs, a way to measure the air temp after the compressor at or near the intake manifold? I've never really bothered to learn about it.
If the MAF is located after the blower it will be reading the charge temp of the heated air. You don't want to have it before the blower because it's not accurate. Even with an IC those temps can get toasty.
 

Signed5.0

Member
Joined
Oct 23, 2022
Threads
1
Messages
14
Reaction score
11
Location
OKC
First Name
Kale
Vehicle(s)
19 Mustang GT (Roushcharged)
Adding to this.

Just installed spacers last night from FIinterchiller, 20-25* over ambient with normal driving, still pulling in 50-60 over ambient with wot.

Iat2 were sitting as high as 160* at the end of the pull. Wish Roush would’ve made the cooking better.
 

Sponsored

Joshinator99

Well-Known Member
Joined
May 13, 2023
Threads
1
Messages
448
Reaction score
798
Location
Massachusetts
First Name
Josh
Vehicle(s)
2022 Mustang GT Premium, 2017 Camaro 2SS
Adding to this.

Just installed spacers last night from FIinterchiller, 20-25* over ambient with normal driving, still pulling in 50-60 over ambient with wot.

Iat2 were sitting as high as 160* at the end of the pull. Wish Roush would’ve made the cooking better.
50-60 degrees over ambient is crazy. Ouch…!

Are you 100% sure there are no air pockets in the IC system…?
 

BlownGP

Well-Known Member
Joined
Jan 25, 2016
Threads
33
Messages
1,093
Reaction score
287
Location
Houston/Baton Rouge
First Name
Steven
Vehicle(s)
Pontiac, Ford, Dodge

Signed5.0

Member
Joined
Oct 23, 2022
Threads
1
Messages
14
Reaction score
11
Location
OKC
First Name
Kale
Vehicle(s)
19 Mustang GT (Roushcharged)
50-60 degrees over ambient is crazy. Ouch…!

Are you 100% sure there are no air pockets in the IC system…?
Potentially, we just got the car done and didn’t have a good enough vacuum system for the entire cooling system so we couldn’t pull vacuum.


So these
https://fiinterchillers.com/product/ford-coyote-blower-spacer-plates/

Didn't do anything really? That's totally opposite of what everyone else has experienced. Umm
I did notice a difference, just not as good as everyone else’s.


probably had the car out long enough where anything under the hood will get heat soaked anyway
Maybe 1 hour. It was 100 today so your probably right. I do notice a difference though.

Honestly time will tell, once the system gets fully burped and all that. I do notice a difference though. I had high hopes it was as good as everyone says it is.
 

BlownGP

Well-Known Member
Joined
Jan 25, 2016
Threads
33
Messages
1,093
Reaction score
287
Location
Houston/Baton Rouge
First Name
Steven
Vehicle(s)
Pontiac, Ford, Dodge
That's good..

True. 100* is hot no matter what cooling mods you have. You drive around with dry ice in the intercooler and still see some high temps. lol

Keep us updated.. Thanks
 

Sponsored

Grimreaper

Well-Known Member
Joined
Jan 23, 2019
Threads
15
Messages
622
Reaction score
302
Location
Dallas
Vehicle(s)
2017 GT
Something doesn't seem right with your setup. What pulley and blower? What pump? Anything still touching that would effectively bypass the spacers?

Have done 2-3 hours city driving in 105 degree temps or 2--3 hours highway followed by hour of city. Results have always been the same. Even extended idle (45 mins-1 hr)with ac on in 95+ temps and parked in parking lot. All the fluid temps/ under hood temps stabilize pretty quickly once engines up to temp.

Pulled somewhat recent long idle log, mid 90's ambient. 35 minutes no movement and ac on. iat rose to 147, iat2 only 127.
 
Last edited:

Signed5.0

Member
Joined
Oct 23, 2022
Threads
1
Messages
14
Reaction score
11
Location
OKC
First Name
Kale
Vehicle(s)
19 Mustang GT (Roushcharged)
That's good..

True. 100* is hot no matter what cooling mods you have. You drive around with dry ice in the intercooler and still see some high temps. lol

Keep us updated.. Thanks
Yeah, wasn't a super good metric to see how bad the heat soak gets under normal operating temps, as these temps arent normal.

I do want to add, other than the Roush Phase 2, it is a completely STOCK cooling system not even water wetter or a 170 Thermostat. My line of thought is that now that the spacers are added, any small change to the cooling system should be twice as good now that the Roush Blower isn't metal to metal on the heads. Next mods are the thermostat + temp blanket for the underside of the Roush blower and a 70/30 mix with water wetter to see where the car stands.

EDIT: This is for a 18+ mustang gt which have notorious heating issues due to the outdated Roush Intercooler brick ON the blower. 15-17 Generally don't have this issue, but spacers work the same on the 2nd gen.
 

Angrey

Well-Known Member
Joined
Jun 21, 2020
Threads
104
Messages
2,791
Reaction score
2,956
Location
Coral Gables
Vehicle(s)
2016 GT350
After my FI interchiller setup, when I mash the IAT2 goes DOWN not up. When cruising and the blowe is largely in bypass, the IAT2's still hover just above ambient (once it's fully heat soaked) but once I mash the go lever, I can watch the IAT2's start dropping........quickly.

It's a weird phenomenon that I've tried to make sense of, but I guess with the motor at low load, the air charge doesn't have enough density or dwell time to get fully cooled as it flies by the intercooler core. Once the air load goes higher and boost is created, it must somehow greatly improve the thermal transfer inside the intercooler brick.

I have yet to install a temp sensor on my IC system so to have all the information that's probably a next step at some point. I just don't have any external gauges outside of boost gauge anymore (Ngauge is gone) so I'm not sure where I'd send the output and I don't want to add to the instrumentation.

Point is, I'm seeing IAT2 drop under a pull, not rise.
 

Joshinator99

Well-Known Member
Joined
May 13, 2023
Threads
1
Messages
448
Reaction score
798
Location
Massachusetts
First Name
Josh
Vehicle(s)
2022 Mustang GT Premium, 2017 Camaro 2SS
After my FI interchiller setup, when I mash the IAT2 goes DOWN not up. When cruising and the blowe is largely in bypass, the IAT2's still hover just above ambient (once it's fully heat soaked) but once I mash the go lever, I can watch the IAT2's start dropping........quickly.

It's a weird phenomenon that I've tried to make sense of, but I guess with the motor at low load, the air charge doesn't have enough density or dwell time to get fully cooled as it flies by the intercooler core. Once the air load goes higher and boost is created, it must somehow greatly improve the thermal transfer inside the intercooler brick.

I have yet to install a temp sensor on my IC system so to have all the information that's probably a next step at some point. I just don't have any external gauges outside of boost gauge anymore (Ngauge is gone) so I'm not sure where I'd send the output and I don't want to add to the instrumentation.

Point is, I'm seeing IAT2 drop under a pull, not rise.
FYI that happens on my 3.0L Gen5 Whipple with no chiller. IAT2 is lower at the end of the quarter mile than when I started. Key is proper brick size and the Whipple delivers in spades.
IMG_3665_Original.jpeg
 

BlownGP

Well-Known Member
Joined
Jan 25, 2016
Threads
33
Messages
1,093
Reaction score
287
Location
Houston/Baton Rouge
First Name
Steven
Vehicle(s)
Pontiac, Ford, Dodge
Yeah, wasn't a super good metric to see how bad the heat soak gets under normal operating temps, as these temps arent normal.

I do want to add, other than the Roush Phase 2, it is a completely STOCK cooling system not even water wetter or a 170 Thermostat. My line of thought is that now that the spacers are added, any small change to the cooling system should be twice as good now that the Roush Blower isn't metal to metal on the heads. Next mods are the thermostat + temp blanket for the underside of the Roush blower and a 70/30 mix with water wetter to see where the car stands.

EDIT: This is for a 18+ mustang gt which have notorious heating issues due to the outdated Roush Intercooler brick ON the blower. 15-17 Generally don't have this issue, but spacers work the same on the 2nd gen.
ahh.. You have a 2018 2650... That could be why the temps are not so drastic. Like you said those do have heat soaking problems.
Sponsored

 
 








Top