Ebm
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Nov 21, 2016
- Threads
- 66
- Messages
- 3,033
- Reaction score
- 1,331
- Location
- North Carolina
- First Name
- Guy
- Vehicle(s)
- '14 GT
Manual > Remote Start
Sponsored
These days I don't see remote start happening in MT cars until their manual transmissions get a park sprag just like what the automatics have.My 2013 manual BMW allowed remote start. As long as the parking brake was pulled tight and the shifter was in neutral, it would start. I really don't see a problem with it, or why Ford won't do this.
Back when my wife and I still had commutes, that's basically what we did. Scratching a windshield with an ice scraper just once was lesson enough about letting the defroster do all the hard work.While remote start on MT would be nice, it's really not that bad to go out, start it, clean off the car if needed, and either go back inside to warm up or get in and drive away, by which time the temps should be warm enough if plugged in.
Yeah, ok. That makes sense.activeGT
Vehicle(s):
2018 GT Premium PP1 and a 2017 Super Duty F250 Lariat 4x4
Joined:
Nov 2, 2014
Location:
South Florida
Dude.....it's cold other places.
My '97 540, '99 540, '01 M5, '04 330, '05 M3, '08 550 and '12 650 all had MT... but did not have remote start, nor was it a factory option.I know my 2003 330ci (manual) had remote start.
It’s gets cold here... once or twice. Like low 50’s.Its sad how sheltered some become when lavished in warmth 24x365. LOL!
I ordered all of my BMW's at Erhard BMW Farmington Hills. The service tech guys always looked out for me, perhaps they enabled it..? Heck, I am getting old & maybe it was my vette that had remote start? Either way, I loved it and miss it in current cars. See no reason why remote start on manuals is not offered in cars today. specially when you have pushbutton start and more safety.My '97 540, '99 540, '01 M5, '04 330, '05 M3, '08 550 and '12 650 all had MT... but did not have remote start, nor was it a factory option.
Because it requires the car to be parked in neutral instead of in gear, and would have to say so in the manual (instead of saying to park in '1' as the manual currently does).See no reason why remote start on manuals is not offered in cars today. specially when you have pushbutton start and more safety.
For me:Why would you want to start it up remotely?
Most of remote start for manual will ask you to press a button, and then engage parking brake, get out while engine idling, and then lock the door to engage remote start.The mechanics and electronics for an interlock would be simple.
With the 6 speed, there is already an empty leg (opposite reverse) to put a parking sprag. Use the same gear selector and have it lock the output shaft to the transmission case. Using this method, if the transmission knows it is in "Neutral-Park" remote start on a manual would work just like remote start on an automatic.
Neutral-Park could also work just like pressing the clutch.
It's actually not ironic. It's liability. If you get into an accident while driving, the other party can sue you. If your car get into an accident without you in it, the other party have to sue the car manufacturer.Isn't it ironic the manufacturers don't want to option a remote start feature for manual transmissions for liability reasons. Yet they allow adaptive cruise speeding up and slowing down; lane assist features trying to keep the "texter's" in their lane; emergency assist braking in-case someone forgets or is too slow to apply the brake; and self driving Uber's, Tesla's, etc. If they wanted, they could put enough interlock features on the shutdown and restart program that an issue shouldn't occur.
I believe the majority of accidental starts is a factor of installers leaving safety features uninstalled and others trying to defeat the safety features.