Kahboom
Kahboom
- Joined
- Nov 28, 2014
- Threads
- 26
- Messages
- 1,201
- Reaction score
- 184
- Location
- Cathedral City, CA
- Vehicle(s)
- 2015 Mustang GTPP, Recaros/2014 Explorer Sport 4X4
Sponsored
Do you have a pic from the side? Curios if it broke in the same place that the stock sprockets are breaking. Could anything else have lead to this failure? Having held the stock and boundary in my hands, I don't see how it couldn't be stronger than stock![]()
Failed boundary crank sprocket
Can you post a picture of the mating surfaces between the inner and outer portions of the OPG?Don't think I'm going to use there brand again. Switched to MMR opg and ctg will see how it goes with the new motor.
So you can hold two crank sprockets in your hand and make that determination? Nice.Do you have a pic from the side? Curios if it broke in the same place that the stock sprockets are breaking. Could anything else have lead to this failure? Having held the stock and boundary in my hands, I don't see how it couldn't be stronger than stock
How did I know that that was coming... I'm certainly no metallurgist and have no way to determine the composition of either, but the stock is extremely thin in the area of the keyway and boundary has done a good job of addressing that.So you can hold two crank sprockets in your hand and make that determination? Nice.
Does the amount of thickness boundary added above the keyway really make any difference if they too are cracking? To nip this at the Bud so to speak, I am sure we could take up a Fund to pay for sending both a failed OEM and a failed Boundary OPG/CS to a Metallurgist Lab and have a Complete Failure Analysis Test done as to why they failed and exactly what are the differences between the two as far as metal composition, harness ETC . This would clear up everything which has to due with the sprockets. Just My Opinion. Good LuckHow did I know that that was coming... I'm certainly no metallurgist and have no way to determine the composition of either, but the stock is extremely thin in the area of the keyway and boundary has done a good job of addressing that.
I suppose that would depend on why it broke. I've seen plenty of pics of stock sprockets broken, but this is the first boundary I've seen a pic of. I'd absolutely be down to contribute to a failure analysis. After looking at his pic again though, the current Boundary crank gear has a much more significant anti-burst ring around the center.Does the amount of thickness boundary added above the keyway really make any difference if they too are cracking? To nip this at the Bud so to speak, I am sure we could take up a Fund to pay for sending both a failed OEM and a failed Boundary OPG/CS to a Metallurgist Lab and have a Complete Failure Analysis Test done as to why they failed and exactly what are the differences between the two as far as metal composition, harness ETC . This would clear up everything which has to due with the sprockets. Just My Opinion. Good Luck
Yes I agree. But material alone is not really the defining factor with metal parts. Metal Composition, Metal Impurities, Incorrect Heat treatment, machining or casting creating an inherent structural material deficiency. Are Boundary parts made in China, if so that would most likely be the issue. China is known for metal impurities, machining inconsistencies. Just SayingI suppose that would depend on why it broke. I've seen plenty of pics of stock sprockets broken, but this is the first boundary I've seen a pic of. I'd absolutely be down to contribute to a failure analysis. After looking at his pic again though, the current Boundary crank gear has a much more significant anti-burst ring around the center.
![]()
They claim to be machined in house from US sourced heat treated 4340 chromoly billets hardened to Rockwell C scale hardness of 50-55. They also claim 50% stronger which I would like to believe was verified through actual testing, but perhaps they just randomly made that number up. I've found some older pics on retailers websites showing the less significant anti-burst ring. Perhaps they realized the original design was still experiencing failures.Yes I agree. But material alone is not really the defining factor with metal parts. Metal Composition, Metal Impurities, Incorrect Heat treatment, machining or casting creating an inherent structural material deficiency. Are Boundary parts made in China, if so that would most likely be the issue. China is known for metal impurities, machining inconsistencies. Just Saying
Well, all of this will be verified from the test.They claim to be machined in house from US sourced heat treated 4340 chromoly billets hardened to Rockwell C scale hardness of 50-55. They also claim 50% stronger which I would like to believe was verified through actual testing, but perhaps they just randomly made that number up. I've found some older pics on retailers websites showing the less significant anti-burst ring. Perhaps they realized the original design was still experiencing failures.