Out of curiosity what is “meh”? The 2015, 16 , and 17 are all the same minus a few minor changes to the audio system and some package options.
Exactly my point, there really isn't anything that stands out about those years. And the new darkhorse looks similar to the Camaro. Mustangs are a dime a dozen on the road these days. Anyone that drives a sports car other than a mustang knows that because you get revved at every other block lol. The initial reason for me liking the 5.0 with the blower that i bought was that it looks stock. Looks like just your regular run of the mill 5.0 that you see every other block. Until it's not. You can ask the chargers and scat packs or modified 5.0s that yell "what you got done to that thing" when i put 2-3 cars on them. In the end their really just cheaper (not including gt500s or gt350s) more attainable sports cars for kids.
I’m confused, you said the 2017+ models are meh but now you’re saying they are all meh? And of course they are everywhere, they’re the most highly produced sports car ever made and they appeal to a vast range of demographics.
The rear fenders screeeeeeeam Camaro. 2015+ and up are meh. Being the most highly produced sports car ever is synonymous with cheap and attainable.I’m confused, you said the 2017+ models are meh but now you’re saying they are all meh? And of course they are everywhere, they’re the most highly produced sports car ever made and they appeal to a vast range of demographics.
I see no resemblance between the DH and Camaro…especially considering there is no 24+ Camaro
Not sure if something got lost in translation, but my earlier references to 2005-2006 and 2017+ GT is in regards to the Ford GT, not Mustang GT. Neither one of the generations of Ford GT are meh, even at their high prices. That was the point I was trying to make with ZL and asking if those are considered overpriced because they have a Ford badge on them. I’m enjoying the conversations either way but just wanted to point that out
You act as if Camaro's aren't a dime a dozen either lol, and they're also cheap affordable sports cars.
I'm not disagreeing with that, when I mention cheap and affordable, I'm specifically talking about 5.0s...not the GT350R/GT500 group....just like the ZL1. Although some COULD argue the bargain buy for price and value would go to the SS....or even the ZL1 compared to the competition.
It sounds like you're typing a lot of words and not saying much to me.
Yeah I’m still not following anything you’re saying and it sounds like you’re just babbling on for no apparent reason. You said you didn’t like 2017+ Mustangs yet the 2017 looks just like the 2015 and 2016. So excuse me while I leave this part of the conversation as it’s just not worth my effort anymore.
Thank you!Think there’s a troll in the thread….. Sometimes the ignore button is a beautiful thing.
I'm guessing he meant the '18+ due to their inferior exterior restyle versus the '15-'17s...
WHAT???? Open your eyes. The S650 lools like a camaro from every angle. Except for the horse emblem and the tail lights I think every S650 is a Camaro at first.
If you mean having high rear arches (they all do), or short wheelbase (they all do) or a pair of headlights and four wheels…then yes they look alike. Otherwise I see no resemblance.
I know, that was my subtle call out that he was being pedantic in his ramblings.I'm guessing he meant the '18+ due to their inferior exterior restyle versus the '15-'17s...
