Sponsored

Help me understand E85

hockale1

Well-Known Member
Joined
Nov 14, 2015
Threads
7
Messages
77
Reaction score
68
Location
US
Vehicle(s)
2020 GT350
For some reason known only to Ford, they turned off the flex fuel setting in the mustang ECU. All the tuners do for a flex tune is flip the switch and fill in a few tables that ford left zeroed out.
Generally correct, though some of the important bits of flex fuel are straight up missing, so even with flex fuel enabled and ff cals filled in, there Is still some functionality that is missing compared to f150.

EDIT: So as not to mislead anyone looking at this years down the line, for 15MY (and possibly 16MY-17MY), flex fuel tunes are limited in their ability to modify spark based on ethanol content. @K4fxd brought it to my attention that at least the 19MY tune has this capability.
Sponsored

 
Last edited:

K4fxd

Well-Known Member
Joined
Apr 2, 2020
Threads
104
Messages
10,556
Reaction score
8,774
Location
NKY
First Name
Dan
Vehicle(s)
2017 gt, 2002 FXDWG, 2008 C6,

LOL WUT

Well-Known Member
Joined
Aug 31, 2015
Threads
38
Messages
1,356
Reaction score
1,708
Location
Illinois
Vehicle(s)
19 GT
Usually it’s around 10:1 and typically fuel is around e70-e95
How are you measuring E content? E95 is absurdly high from a pump.
 

Strokerswild

Shallow and Pedantic
Joined
Nov 7, 2014
Threads
74
Messages
6,646
Reaction score
5,472
Location
Southern MN
First Name
Dave
Vehicle(s)
Things With Wheels
Rev X tester
That pump consistently comes out to e90-95 tested by me and others in the area
While I've never tested it explicitly, my nGauge frequently indicates that my usual station runs 90-91% during the summer months. So it is possible.

I always wonder about the true accuracy of the nGauge, but since the car runs a flex tune I don't worry about it.
 

Sponsored

K4fxd

Well-Known Member
Joined
Apr 2, 2020
Threads
104
Messages
10,556
Reaction score
8,774
Location
NKY
First Name
Dan
Vehicle(s)
2017 gt, 2002 FXDWG, 2008 C6,
Generally correct, though some of the important bits of flex fuel are straight up missing, so even with flex fuel enabled and ff cals filled in, there Is still some functionality that is missing compared to f150.
Again what is missing. As far as I can find it is the same ECU and software.
 

hockale1

Well-Known Member
Joined
Nov 14, 2015
Threads
7
Messages
77
Reaction score
68
Location
US
Vehicle(s)
2020 GT350
Again what is missing. As far as I can find it is the same ECU and software.
Pull up an F150 tune and compare it to a S550 tune. You will find that there are no flex fuel dependent borderline tables, mbt tables, or flex fuel blenders for aforementioned tables. About all they give you are tables for getting the AFR to calculate correctly and some cold start stuff, nothing for spark.
 

hockale1

Well-Known Member
Joined
Nov 14, 2015
Threads
7
Messages
77
Reaction score
68
Location
US
Vehicle(s)
2020 GT350
Rev X tester
That pump consistently comes out to e90-95 tested by me and others in the area
Holy shit, well that fully explains your low range. Overall I’d say you’re doing just fine, but I would be somewhat concerned about your injector pulsewidths getting maxed out with those E90 and above fuels. Are you running factory injectors?
 

Xavier208

Well-Known Member
Joined
May 4, 2020
Threads
36
Messages
189
Reaction score
38
Location
Arizona
Vehicle(s)
2020 Mustang GT 400a
Holy shit, well that fully explains your low range. Overall I’d say you’re doing just fine, but I would be somewhat concerned about your injector pulsewidths getting maxed out with those E90 and above fuels. Are you running factory injectors?
Yeah factory injectors
 

K4fxd

Well-Known Member
Joined
Apr 2, 2020
Threads
104
Messages
10,556
Reaction score
8,774
Location
NKY
First Name
Dan
Vehicle(s)
2017 gt, 2002 FXDWG, 2008 C6,
Pull up an F150 tune and compare it to a S550 tune. You will find that there are no flex fuel dependent borderline tables, mbt tables, or flex fuel blenders for aforementioned tables. About all they give you are tables for getting the AFR to calculate correctly and some cold start stuff, nothing for spark.
This is a 2019 GT mustang tune and........
FFV Spark.png
 

Sponsored

hockale1

Well-Known Member
Joined
Nov 14, 2015
Threads
7
Messages
77
Reaction score
68
Location
US
Vehicle(s)
2020 GT350
This is a 2019 GT mustang tune and........
FFV Spark.png
Ok fair enough, I’ve not looked at 19MY+ calibrations, I’m more focused on 15MY. Perhaps with upgrade 3 and PFDI it was added. Good for those folks!
 

K4fxd

Well-Known Member
Joined
Apr 2, 2020
Threads
104
Messages
10,556
Reaction score
8,774
Location
NKY
First Name
Dan
Vehicle(s)
2017 gt, 2002 FXDWG, 2008 C6,
On the 2 gen you can use the octane adjustment under borderline corrections.
Ford uses this table on the 2 gen F150's also.
 

ChitownStang

Well-Known Member
Joined
Mar 9, 2015
Threads
74
Messages
2,860
Reaction score
3,342
Location
Chicago, North Shore
Vehicle(s)
2021 Mach 1
Vehicle Showcase
1
Just tested another gas station by me in Chicago area. Both Thortons and Woodmans-
67%
You guys are lucky getting that good of E85. No point for me to run a E85 or Flex in this area.
 

K4fxd

Well-Known Member
Joined
Apr 2, 2020
Threads
104
Messages
10,556
Reaction score
8,774
Location
NKY
First Name
Dan
Vehicle(s)
2017 gt, 2002 FXDWG, 2008 C6,
It uses that table and another to increase borderline spark due to octane. When the logic senses anything over E20 or so it calculates spark using this modifier.

The gen 2 uses 1 table to do the same. There is more resolution in the Gen3's

A head scratcher, the F150 uses less total advance than the GT even under FFV tuning when using optimum power tables.
Sponsored

 
 




Top