Sponsored

Help me understand flex fuel tunes

sms2022

Well-Known Member
Joined
Jan 22, 2024
Threads
44
Messages
897
Reaction score
983
Location
Detroit
First Name
SS
Vehicle(s)
2022 Mustang GT PP1 premium
Been looking into a flex fuel tune. My understanding is that the primary issue with them is they go very rich if an air leak develops because the computer infers flex fuel content from how rich/lean the wideband measures the exhaust during the first few minute of a startup.

if this is the case, how does ford get around this issue with the factory f150 flex fuel tune?

Unfortunately the companies that include a fuel sniffer as part of their flex fuel package don’t make one for a Gen 3.
Sponsored

 
OP
OP
sms2022

sms2022

Well-Known Member
Joined
Jan 22, 2024
Threads
44
Messages
897
Reaction score
983
Location
Detroit
First Name
SS
Vehicle(s)
2022 Mustang GT PP1 premium
call Livernois. Get their flex tune. Live happy.
And quit stabbing your intake piping with an awl and you won't develop air leaks.
I live about 40 minutes from them. I might have to make a trip down there to talk to them
 

mejohn50

Intergalactic Snail
Joined
Jun 12, 2016
Threads
24
Messages
878
Reaction score
1,063
Location
United States
First Name
Mitch
Vehicle(s)
slow junk
Two things:

1 - the Ford logic includes safeguards that tell the system not to infer an ethanol content change unless a fuel refill happens. So, theoretically, if a vacuum leak happened without a concurrent fuel refill it should throw a code. If, by extreme coincidence, you developed a vacuum leak at the exact moment you did a fuel refill it could throw the system off. The likelihood is low, but it’s possible, and it’s part of what I don’t like about the OEM logic. Though I’ve tested the OEM logic on a boosted gen 3 with good results.

2 - PCMTEC offers a flex fuel system that uses an ethanol content sensor in the fuel line. There are tuners that offer this system now for gen 3. I’m self-tuning my car and running this system on a boosted gen 3.
 

Rolls

Well-Known Member
Gold Sponsor
Joined
Jan 29, 2020
Threads
2
Messages
355
Reaction score
457
Location
Australia
Website
www.pcmtec.com
Vehicle(s)
Mustang 18 GT
As MeJohn alluded to there are quite a few gotchas with the OEM flex system which is why Lund and other companies won't offer it on PD cars. Too much risk of user error and an engine going pop.
 

Sponsored

OP
OP
sms2022

sms2022

Well-Known Member
Joined
Jan 22, 2024
Threads
44
Messages
897
Reaction score
983
Location
Detroit
First Name
SS
Vehicle(s)
2022 Mustang GT PP1 premium
Two things:

1 - the Ford logic includes safeguards that tell the system not to infer an ethanol content change unless a fuel refill happens. So, theoretically, if a vacuum leak happened without a concurrent fuel refill it should throw a code. If, by extreme coincidence, you developed a vacuum leak at the exact moment you did a fuel refill it could throw the system off. The likelihood is low, but it’s possible, and it’s part of what I don’t like about the OEM logic. Though I’ve tested the OEM logic on a boosted gen 3 with good results.

2 - PCMTEC offers a flex fuel system that uses an ethanol content sensor in the fuel line. There are tuners that offer this system now for gen 3. I’m self-tuning my car and running this system on a boosted gen 3.
number 2 is exactly what I’m looking for. Don’t mind spending to get the right system. Would you mind sharing (PM is fine) the names of the tuners you’re talking about? All I have found is Lund but I’d like to talk to a couple of tuners first before picking one.
 

HKusp

Well-Known Member
Joined
Jul 22, 2021
Threads
37
Messages
2,227
Reaction score
2,875
Location
Hampton, Md.
First Name
Jason
Vehicle(s)
2018 Mustang GT
Wengerd, Shoemaker and Ortiz. Let Lund do their thing on their fanboys.
 
OP
OP
sms2022

sms2022

Well-Known Member
Joined
Jan 22, 2024
Threads
44
Messages
897
Reaction score
983
Location
Detroit
First Name
SS
Vehicle(s)
2022 Mustang GT PP1 premium
Wengerd, Shoemaker and Ortiz. Let Lund do their thing on their fanboys.
Thanks. My thoughts also on Lund. That’s why I was asking about alternatives.
 

Angrey

Well-Known Member
Joined
Jun 21, 2020
Threads
104
Messages
2,794
Reaction score
2,984
Location
Coral Gables
Vehicle(s)
2016 GT350
In your weird scenario, yes, if you happened to be running an inferred flex fuel tune and just so happened to get a "leak" (it depends on whether you're boosted or not whether that ends up being fuel added or subtracted).

First, no tuners (that I'm aware of) will do inferred flex fuel on a boosted setup. As above, PCMtech offers TRUE flex fuel with the sensor. But no one before that was willing to do the inferred version with a blower.

So I'm assuming you're naturally aspirated. If that's the case and you have a "leak" you're getting more air sucked into the motor than is being metered at the MAF. That normally results in the short term trims adding fuel because the 02's are telling the computer they're seeing more residual 02 than what should be based on the MAF signal. It'll adjust that way until the trims reach 20% and then throw a code at you.

If this was to occur (n/a) at the exact same time as your reset (through a fuel level change) the computer would infer that the additional oxygen is because of higher ethanol content (and not enough fuel is being squirted). The result would be the same for adding in more fuel however, the danger there would be that it would also try to add more timing based on the inferred (incorrect) ethanol content.

Bottom line is, yes, if you somehow sprung a vacuum leak EXACTLY at the moment you tripped an ALC% relearn, some less than optimal things could occur. But all the typical protections would still be in place.

Just avoid all that and go with PCMtech and use a true flex fuel sensor. You still have all the previous issues of an air leak, but the computer is no longer mixing the two issues, it's calling for proper fuel flow based off the ethanol sensor input and then it just would recognize something off with the wideband readings.
 
OP
OP
sms2022

sms2022

Well-Known Member
Joined
Jan 22, 2024
Threads
44
Messages
897
Reaction score
983
Location
Detroit
First Name
SS
Vehicle(s)
2022 Mustang GT PP1 premium
In your weird scenario, yes, if you happened to be running an inferred flex fuel tune and just so happened to get a "leak" (it depends on whether you're boosted or not whether that ends up being fuel added or subtracted).

First, no tuners (that I'm aware of) will do inferred flex fuel on a boosted setup. As above, PCMtech offers TRUE flex fuel with the sensor. But no one before that was willing to do the inferred version with a blower.

So I'm assuming you're naturally aspirated. If that's the case and you have a "leak" you're getting more air sucked into the motor than is being metered at the MAF. That normally results in the short term trims adding fuel because the 02's are telling the computer they're seeing more residual 02 than what should be based on the MAF signal. It'll adjust that way until the trims reach 20% and then throw a code at you.

If this was to occur (n/a) at the exact same time as your reset (through a fuel level change) the computer would infer that the additional oxygen is because of higher ethanol content (and not enough fuel is being squirted). The result would be the same for adding in more fuel however, the danger there would be that it would also try to add more timing based on the inferred (incorrect) ethanol content.

Bottom line is, yes, if you somehow sprung a vacuum leak EXACTLY at the moment you tripped an ALC% relearn, some less than optimal things could occur. But all the typical protections would still be in place.

Just avoid all that and go with PCMtech and use a true flex fuel sensor. You still have all the previous issues of an air leak, but the computer is no longer mixing the two issues, it's calling for proper fuel flow based off the ethanol sensor input and then it just would recognize something off with the wideband readings.
My thoughts exactly based on the research I did after I made this thread. I reached out to wengerd based on the above suggestion.
 

Sponsored

ChitownStang

Well-Known Member
Joined
Mar 9, 2015
Threads
81
Messages
3,259
Reaction score
4,198
Location
Chicago, North Shore
Vehicle(s)
2021 Mach 1
Vehicle Showcase
1
As MeJohn alluded to there are quite a few gotchas with the OEM flex system which is why Lund and other companies won't offer it on PD cars. Too much risk of user error and an engine going pop.
So how is Livernois doing the Flex tune with no issues. They say completely safe and 50 state legal.
I’ve run it for 1.5 years now with 0 issues and I change fuel from summer to winter and winter to summer .
Per their instructions, When I fill up, I just drive the car nicely for first 15 min and don’t sit at idle.
Do they have the secret sauce?
I know they work closely with Ford
 

Angrey

Well-Known Member
Joined
Jun 21, 2020
Threads
104
Messages
2,794
Reaction score
2,984
Location
Coral Gables
Vehicle(s)
2016 GT350
So how is Livernois doing the Flex tune with no issues. They say completely safe and 50 state legal.
I’ve run it for 1.5 years now with 0 issues and I change fuel from summer to winter and winter to summer .
Per their instructions, When I fill up, I just drive the car nicely for first 15 min and don’t sit at idle.
Do they have the secret sauce?
I know they work closely with Ford
You have a blower car?
 

Magnetic Stang

Well-Known Member
Joined
Jun 13, 2022
Threads
0
Messages
198
Reaction score
386
Location
Ohio
First Name
Chad
Vehicle(s)
2018 Mustang GT
So how is Livernois doing the Flex tune with no issues. They say completely safe and 50 state legal.
I’ve run it for 1.5 years now with 0 issues and I change fuel from summer to winter and winter to summer .
Per their instructions, When I fill up, I just drive the car nicely for first 15 min and don’t sit at idle.
Do they have the secret sauce?
I know they work closely with Ford
He's talking about cars with boost. Not N/A cars.
How are you not running E all the time?? 93 just makes me sad now. :crackup:
 
OP
OP
sms2022

sms2022

Well-Known Member
Joined
Jan 22, 2024
Threads
44
Messages
897
Reaction score
983
Location
Detroit
First Name
SS
Vehicle(s)
2022 Mustang GT PP1 premium
He's talking about cars with boost. Not N/A cars.
How are you not running E all the time?? 93 just makes me sad now. :crackup:
Off topic but what tire/spring specs are you running? Car looks great in your profile pic
 

Magnetic Stang

Well-Known Member
Joined
Jun 13, 2022
Threads
0
Messages
198
Reaction score
386
Location
Ohio
First Name
Chad
Vehicle(s)
2018 Mustang GT
Off topic but what tire/spring specs are you running? Car looks great in your profile pic
Thanks. It's actually the stock setup with 20mm spacers on all 4 wheels with Michelin pilot sport 4s tires. The spacers seem to push the tire out enough that it fills in the wheel wells more.
Sponsored

 
 








Top