5.0 Dyno Chart Compilation

[Jefbay]

2018 PP1 GT 6MT : 6,200 miles

Baseline dyno run last week: Stock w/ AFE dry drop in filter, 91 octane (397 whp / 399 tq)
Yesterday's dyno run: AFE dry drop in filter, Lund E85R tune, Roush axle back, E85 (428 whp / 408 tq)

Both dyno runs on Dynojet at 6,063 ft. elevation.

Last week's run: 80 deg. / 30% humidity
Yesterday's run: 85 deg. / 34% humidity

4th gear pull on both runs.

Sponsored

 

[JeromeS550]

Surprised to see the TQ so close to the HP. Why were the pulls done in 5th instead of 4th (1:1)?

Jerome

 

[geddys]

2016 GT Auto, Europe edition with following mods:

GT350 Intake Manifold
GT350 Throttle Body
JLT GT350 CAI
Corsa Extreme Cat-back
Tune

Mind that these are metric units in graph.

1 KM (metric) = 0.98592 horsepower ( imperial )
16,8 (celsius) = 60.8 ( fahrenheit )
Elevation: Around 330 feet

Pull done on 4th gear on DynoProject dyno. Unfortunattely I haven't done dyno prior to mods installation :(

 

[CORNYOTE]

2019 GT A10

• MMR Billet oil pump gears and crank sprocket
• Whipple 3.0L stage 2 w/132mm TB / 3.5 griptech pulley
• Texas Speed full length catless headers and x-pipe
  
• Fore Level 2 fuel system with dual 267’s and filters setup for e85
• Injector Dynamics ID1050x
  
• NGauge programmer
• E85 tune by Lund

Pull was done in 6th gear due to some clutch slip in 7th.

Mustang Dyno 750/573

 

[2morrow]

Here are the stages of my motor. I'm still waiting for 1 last dyno day to run on e85 to fully evaluate what's going on.

Car is a 2016 GT PP with extensive road course type modifications.

First Dyno Session: 02.17.2018
Ford Performance Power Pack 2 (GT-350 CAI & TB) with Gen 2 tune (Re-tuned 05/08/17) & MBRP exhaust. Dynojet at RPM Auto @ Rohnert Park.

Second Dyno Session: 09.21.2019
GT-350 CAI, TB, Ported IM, 47 lb Injectors, CS, OPG with 91 and e85 tunes by Palm Beach Dyno with Custom Dual Magnaflow exhaust. Dynojet at RPM Auto @ Rohnert Park.

Car suffered issues on the dyno with multiple codes due to a faulty IMRC actuator wiring harness. This pull was on e85.

Third Dyno Session: 10.09.2019
GT-350 CAI, TB, Ported IM, 47 lb Injectors, CS, OPG with 91 and e85 tunes by Palm Beach Dyno with Custom Dual Magnaflow exhaust. Dynojet at TFB Motorsport @ Sonoma Raceway.

These pulls were on 91 and yielded more power than last run at RPM. I wish all the runs were more consistent with the second run lol.

Weather conditions:

 

[isedawishy]

10, 15, 20, and 23. Could have bumped it up to 26# or so, but it's enough for now

 

[Roush05]

Mods in sig, around 13-14 lbs with boostane added. Either ABS(had a code after) or clutch slip robbed me of 20-30 hp on the last run. This was done in 4th gear as well, not 5th.

Edit for mobile users:

2015 gt m6, Procharger p1x stage 1, 3.4" pulley, ported 2018 manifold, pypes stepped headers, ID 1050x, Lund tune, stock clutch

 

[GT Pony]

This was done in 4th gear as well, not 5th.

Why not 5th gear, which is 1:1 in a 2015?

 

[Roush05]

Why not 5th gear, which is 1:1 in a 2015?

He didn't want to spin the dyno up that high. Which is fine with me since the last place I was at did it in 4th as well, so I had a better comparison.

 

[Brentkbc6]

2017 Mustang GT

All stock besides Borla (Ford Racing) Catback Exhaust




Subscribe to our channel to watch my 17 Stang GT slowly transform into a beast one step at a time!!!

I wanted to get a baseline as I am now finishing up installing
Kooks LT Headers w/cats
Ngauge E85 Lund Tune
JLT Cold Air Intake

New Dyno Video will be posted soon!!!

 

[3star2nr]

Not sure how to upload the pdf directly from my computer, so I'll just attach the file. My car is a 2015 GT PP with the following power mods: Comp stage 1 cams, GT350 manifold, GT350 throttle body, Roush CAI, Kooks 1 3/4" green catted headers, Borla S-type catback, and remote tuned by Alex at Lund. Car made 436 hp/366 tq SAE corrected on a Dynojet. Car honestly felt stronger and drove better before the manifold, throttle body, and cams... My "baseline" was on a Mustang dyno (the shop doing the Lund remote tune uses one), and consisted of everything except the manifold, TB, and cams, and the car put down 400 hp/363 tq. The combo of the cams and manifold made the car lose a LOT of power down low, and gained only slightly up top. I'm trying to figure out where I want to go from here as I'm not too pleased with the car in its current form. The thing that sucks is that it's hard to find good info on cams and cam tunes as very few people actually do them. Perhaps this is why... Hard to know who is even good at tuning cammed cars. I went with Lund because I know they've done some in the past, plus they had done my original tune and I already had the Gauge. I previously had stage 3 cams on, and the torque loss was ridiculous. Compared to my baseline run, the car only gained 11 rwhp and lost significant torque all the way to 6,000 RPM. Figured the stage 1 cams would be better for my setup, which they were, but still not what I had hoped for. I created a thread about the results of the cams here, in case anyone is interested in more info:
https://www.mustang6g.com/forums/th...esults-and-comparison-to-stage-3-cams.108268/
Any feedback is always appreciated.

So there are a couple problems with your setup.
1. the green catted headers... These headers have more dense internals in the cats to allow them to filter the exhaust more. As a result they will make less power, if you go non catted connection pipes you'll see a decent bump in power.

2. with larger cams you lose dynamic compression, so in order to trully make use of the cams you need to raise the compression of the motor and rev higher.

You also need adjustable timing gears to get the cams "degreed" properly. I'd do a compression test on the motor to make sure the car is properly timed... These engines will still run with an entire bank running lower compression...

Finally, The entire point of "stage 3" cams and high lift cams is to shift the powerband higher. If you are building a race motor where u'll be above 6000rpm most of the time high lift cams make sense....

This is the fine print no one tells you about cams. There aren't "bad" or good cams you buy cams for a very specific purpose. Especially on a coyote which is already a very highly tuned motor from the factory.

I think you're dissapointed because you're mismatching parts. And youre doing mods to a DD car where you want to feel a torque and power boost in the midrange and low down. All your mods are focused on top end power.

 

[3star2nr]

Alot of people are still stuck in the 1990s and don't really understand what they have. These cars arent the same engines from the 90s and require a different approach.

If you are DD and want to stay all motor your mods should be centered around optimizing airflow example the Mishimoto air Intake tube, headers and tune. Those 3 mods are all u need on a DD coyote.

If you race alot get the 2018 or gt350 manifold and call it a day. Once you start adding cams you basically need to go all the way... And build a full on race motor...

 

[jrsimon27]

Mustang GT PP 2016
4th gear pull.
Totaly stock!

Did a dyno sesion again.
This time with a dry drop aem airfilter awe cattback track edition and Lund Tune.
5th gear pull

 

[jrsimon27]

2017 Mustang GT

All stock besides Borla (Ford Racing) Catback Exhaust



What whp did it make?


Subscribe to our channel to watch my 17 Stang GT slowly transform into a beast one step at a time!!!

I wanted to get a baseline as I am now finishing up installing
Kooks LT Headers w/cats
Ngauge E85 Lund Tune
JLT Cold Air Intake

New Dyno Video will be posted soon!!!

 

[PCho222]

Well, I attended my first dyno day at a local speed shop a few days ago and even with the impossible numbers it just proved to me again that a dynamometer is a tool but many treat it like a magic number fairy. For those curious about Dynocom (lesser known brand), they have a Dynocom AWD 5000 dyno that seemed to read pretty high that day. Meaningless number aside, I had some other cars to compare with that also ran for everyone's curiosity.

Cars that day:
- My personal favorite, a stock-looking C5Z with a Texas Speed 441ci LS7 made 600whp and 580ftlbs. He said he made 560whp on a Mustang dyno at another shop recently, so a 7% difference.
- Stock 2020 Toyota Supra ran just before I got there and made around 360whp from what I was told. This is interesting because a 2020 Z4 M40i made about the same power earlier this year. Maybe Toyota is sandbagging?
- A few stage 1 5th gen STI's hitting 300 and the usual bunch of heavily modded STI's and EVO's, one running 36lbs of boost and cracking 600whp on ethanol.
- A nitrous A8 Hellcat running on Q16 (bunch of other mods but not sure what) made 1050whp and got a cool little CNC'd token for it. He said he ran an 8.90 in the quarter with this setup.

Other pulls:
- A 2020 BMW Z4 M40i made 368whp / 414ftlbs earlier this June according to a video taken at this same shop. I guess it checks out from what others have gotten on Dynojets. I honestly wouldn't be surprised if the Supra is making essentially the same power as the Z4 but Toyota underrated it so they wouldn't cannibalize BMW's sales.
- The shop owner dyno'ed his stock 2017 Mustang GT when it was new and said it made about 390whp. This seemed 20whp higher than the norm.
- Same owner's stock 2017 Chevy SS made 345whp when new. This sounded really low but I guess that's what other SS owners are saying online. Talk about drivetrain loss...

My mods are a 93 Lund tune, JLT 120mm intake, Kooks headers, MBRP catback, and aluminum flywheel and driveshaft. The run was at sea level in 5th gear and IAT's were ~100. I think this mod combo is a solid ~420-430whp car on a more conservative dyno.

Sponsored