Sponsored

July 2017 Mustang Sales

OP
OP
Topnotch

Topnotch

Well-Known Member
Joined
Aug 1, 2012
Threads
592
Messages
4,565
Reaction score
3,783
Location
NYC
Vehicle(s)
2018 Mazda CX-9 Touring

machsmith

Well-Known Member
Joined
Mar 5, 2016
Threads
11
Messages
3,610
Reaction score
2,043
Location
somewhere along the river
First Name
Jim
Vehicle(s)
Honda Minis
I think the chally only sold 5300+ cars last month. Mustang won July easily.
Haha, im just going by what my dealer told me. Sorry for the relay of garbage info.
Maybe he was talking about his specific dealership but i could have sworn he said total.
 

HoosierDaddy

Well-Known Member
Joined
Jan 2, 2016
Threads
263
Messages
4,628
Reaction score
9,033
Location
Winchestertonfieldville (ok, Scottsdale), AZ
First Name
Randy
Vehicle(s)
2016 GT Premium PP, 2023 Tesla Model 3 Performance, 1978 Trans Am WS6, etc.

bluebeastsrt

Oh boy
Joined
May 10, 2015
Threads
79
Messages
7,544
Reaction score
7,025
Location
New Jersey
First Name
BigD
Vehicle(s)
Ruby red 2019 GT Premium.
Last edited:

1320'

Well-Known Member
Joined
Aug 26, 2014
Threads
19
Messages
3,758
Reaction score
1,616
Location
Medford,Oregon
Vehicle(s)
2011 Avenger...sadly
Bu..bu..bu..

That's a GREAT Camaro number because it's mostly retail sales and according those stats that Medisin trots out from protected trade publications that you can't verify unless you pay for a subscription (but that's your problem) it means the Camaro is the superior car.

***CIRCLE JERK INTENSIFIES****
 

Sponsored

1320'

Well-Known Member
Joined
Aug 26, 2014
Threads
19
Messages
3,758
Reaction score
1,616
Location
Medford,Oregon
Vehicle(s)
2011 Avenger...sadly
Also..

Sales are down because nearly everyone who wants a S550..has one. The market is pretty much saturated. The S550 enjoyed nice, big fat sales numbers for the first 18-20 months because it was the hot new thing..it sizzled.

What we're seeing now is where the Camaro was in late 2012..sales stagnating to a relative proportion to the market.
 

c-rizzle

Well-Known Member
Joined
Feb 17, 2016
Threads
3
Messages
678
Reaction score
210
Location
NOLA
Vehicle(s)
2017 Explorer Sport
So:

Mustang == 6,206
Challenger = 5,333
Camaro == 4,713

To be honest, I wouldn't be surprised if we see a surge in Mustang sales for August.

People on the fence about 2018's now have enough information to decide... either put in an order for 2018 (expensive) or get a 2017 hopefully with some decent price incentives from dealers.

The thing is... unless you want to get the 10-speed automatic, I don't see a big reason to "upgrade" to a 2018. +25hp is always appreciated, better manual transmission, better rubber, BUT most agree worse looks, and new engine technology is always a little bit of a risk.

I'm back & forth with what I want to do... either get a 2018 with 10-speed auto, so its a more functional vehicle in my family (wife could drive it too). When I need her 7 passenger SUV for carpool (she hates my truck and can't drive my '17 mustang). Or just get a Sporty SUV to replace my mustang.
 

Dudie7

Well-Known Member
Joined
Apr 15, 2015
Threads
3
Messages
210
Reaction score
94
Location
North Carolina
Vehicle(s)
2020 Mustang GT
They aren't down 35%.
They aren't niche vehicles either...sports car salels are expected to ebb and flow much more so than something like an SUV.
 

BmacIL

Enginerd
Joined
Sep 21, 2014
Threads
69
Messages
14,989
Reaction score
8,910
Location
Naperville, IL
Vehicle(s)
2015 Guard GT Base, M/T
Vehicle Showcase
1
So:

Mustang == 6,206
Challenger = 5,333
Camaro == 4,713

To be honest, I wouldn't be surprised if we see a surge in Mustang sales for August.

People on the fence about 2018's now have enough information to decide... either put in an order for 2018 (expensive) or get a 2017 hopefully with some decent price incentives from dealers.

The thing is... unless you want to get the 10-speed automatic, I don't see a big reason to "upgrade" to a 2018. +25hp is always appreciated, better manual transmission, better rubber, BUT most agree worse looks, and new engine technology is always a little bit of a risk.

I'm back & forth with what I want to do... either get a 2018 with 10-speed auto, so its a more functional vehicle in my family (wife could drive it too). When I need her 7 passenger SUV for carpool (she hates my truck and can't drive my '17 mustang). Or just get a Sporty SUV to replace my mustang.
The asterisk I'd add is that unless you want/need an auto w/ PP, there's no rational reason to trade in. The changes otherwise aren't enough to lose a bunch of money on trade, and then you have that front-end.
 

DHG1078

Well-Known Member
Joined
Oct 31, 2013
Threads
9
Messages
494
Reaction score
16
Location
So Cal
Vehicle(s)
2001 Mustang Bullitt, 1985 Mustang Hatch
So:

Mustang == 6,206
Challenger = 5,333
Camaro == 4,713

To be honest, I wouldn't be surprised if we see a surge in Mustang sales for August.

People on the fence about 2018's now have enough information to decide... either put in an order for 2018 (expensive) or get a 2017 hopefully with some decent price incentives from dealers.

The thing is... unless you want to get the 10-speed automatic, I don't see a big reason to "upgrade" to a 2018. +25hp is always appreciated, better manual transmission, better rubber, BUT most agree worse looks, and new engine technology is always a little bit of a risk.

I'm back & forth with what I want to do... either get a 2018 with 10-speed auto, so its a more functional vehicle in my family (wife could drive it too). When I need her 7 passenger SUV for carpool (she hates my truck and can't drive my '17 mustang). Or just get a Sporty SUV to replace my mustang.
The asterisk I'd add is that unless you want/need an auto w/ PP, there's no rational reason to trade in. The changes otherwise aren't enough to lose a bunch of money on trade, and then you have that front-end.

I think DI plus a bump in compression is a pretty big reason to upgrade. I think Ford's numbers are on the conservative side, and mod for mod the 2018+ will gain more power than the 2015-2017's.

I agree its not a big enough reason to upgrade if you already have an S550, but if I was in the market I would lean towards the 2018. I don't think the front end looks bad, and I think I would like it more in person. This happens with literally EVERY refresh. Everyone says its ugly at first, and 6 months later its their favorite.
 

Sponsored

millhouse

Well-Known Member
Joined
Jun 27, 2016
Threads
18
Messages
2,652
Reaction score
1,217
Location
Simpsonville SC
Vehicle(s)
2016 Ruby Red GT PP
I think DI plus a bump in compression is a pretty big reason to upgrade. I think Ford's numbers are on the conservative side, and mod for mod the 2018+ will gain more power than the 2015-2017's.

I agree its not a big enough reason to upgrade if you already have an S550, but if I was in the market I would lean towards the 2018. I don't think the front end looks bad, and I think I would like it more in person. This happens with literally EVERY refresh. Everyone says its ugly at first, and 6 months later its their favorite.
Since when are Fords numbers on the conservative side...and what in the world would make you think that?
 

1320'

Well-Known Member
Joined
Aug 26, 2014
Threads
19
Messages
3,758
Reaction score
1,616
Location
Medford,Oregon
Vehicle(s)
2011 Avenger...sadly
I think DI plus a bump in compression is a pretty big reason to upgrade. I think Ford's numbers are on the conservative side, and mod for mod the 2018+ will gain more power than the 2015-2017's.

I agree its not a big enough reason to upgrade if you already have an S550, but if I was in the market I would lean towards the 2018. I don't think the front end looks bad, and I think I would like it more in person. This happens with literally EVERY refresh. Everyone says its ugly at first, and 6 months later its their favorite.
The number that Ford published are the SAE certified number. They're the average of repeatable runs across a collection of production motors. They're allowed to be within 1.5% of the stated figure, so anywhere between 453-467 HP.
 

tom_sprecher

Living Race Car Free
Joined
Jul 2, 2016
Threads
30
Messages
1,239
Reaction score
484
Location
Marietta, GA
Vehicle(s)
2016 GT Premium PP 6MT Race Red

airfuel

Well-Known Member
Joined
Oct 11, 2016
Threads
12
Messages
643
Reaction score
323
Location
CT
Vehicle(s)
Not a Bullitt
I agree its not a big enough reason to upgrade if you already have an S550, but if I was in the market I would lean towards the 2018. I don't think the front end looks bad, and I think I would like it more in person. This happens with literally EVERY refresh. Everyone says its ugly at first, and 6 months later its their favorite.
Exactly!
I was out to buy a 2017 last year when the news of the refresh happened. I waited, I liked, I'm waiting.
Sure the cost is up a bit, but you get more, you pay more.
 

BmacIL

Enginerd
Joined
Sep 21, 2014
Threads
69
Messages
14,989
Reaction score
8,910
Location
Naperville, IL
Vehicle(s)
2015 Guard GT Base, M/T
Vehicle Showcase
1
I think DI plus a bump in compression is a pretty big reason to upgrade. I think Ford's numbers are on the conservative side, and mod for mod the 2018+ will gain more power than the 2015-2017's.

I agree its not a big enough reason to upgrade if you already have an S550, but if I was in the market I would lean towards the 2018. I don't think the front end looks bad, and I think I would like it more in person. This happens with literally EVERY refresh. Everyone says its ugly at first, and 6 months later its their favorite.
Agreed that if you don't have an S550 already, and happen to like the front-end, it is worth the wait as long as you can stomach the price increases. I've said a couple times that while I don't hate the front-end anymore like I did initially, I still feel it went backwards overall aesthetically from the 15-17.
Sponsored

 
 








Top