Will Trump be impeached?

[GT Pony]

I notice that you mention Abel Racing and The Russian Redneck (A.K.A.Andrei) quite a bit in many your posts. Are you Russian?

Sponsored

 

[GT Pony]

I'm just asking since you seem to be quite a bit defensive when people talk about Russians.

 

[watisthis]

Wow, I really can't wait to meet @bjstang a.k.a. comrade, at some mustang events this coming year.

 

[GT Pony]

More like the ejection of a complete lunatic in the office of POTUS. You should really read more than just Trump's Twitter page and watching Faux News.

Although, if you and Doc do read Trump's Twitter, be sure to click on each of Trump's tweets to see how people respond to his tweets.

Trump, the Tweeting Hypnotizer ...

 

[Caballus]

1. There's no "more twisting" because I don't twist words. Nor do I thank Russia.

2. Russia's involvement with Wikileaks is a component of a larger malign effort, which includes espionage and deliberate cyber attacks launched through and into U.S. territory. Their aim, as previously noted, is to divide and conquer. Their overall approach is to operate immediately "below the threshold of traditional war," so-called hybrid warfare. Their actions are strongly supported by an aggressive, invasive (mis)information campaign aimed, in part, at confusing and gaining support from unwitting Americans. Your gratitude for their violations of American sovereignty is an example of their success.

3. Yes, I appreciate AMB Yovanovitch's service to our nation; I do not thank Russia for involving itself in our domestic affairs as part of their attempt to undermine our sovereignty.

4. Anyone who reads past the headlines and sees why the AMB denied Shokin's visa would certainly conclude that they would have done the same.

- Russia is not a friend of the U.S.
- Anything they do to appear to help the U.S. is geared toward undermining the U.S. and its Allies
- There is no way to thank Russia for providing information (assuming they did and assuming it was accurate) without also condoning the methods they used to get the information--underwriting Wikileaks; harboring Snowden...

 

[GT Pony]

Note that Trump made these statements about 5~6 weeks before the Jul 25, 2019 phone call with Pres Z of the Ukraine. Trump has absolutely no regard for the US Constitution or other laws (ie, Federal Election Commission, etc), let alone any ethics or morals, and thinks he can just ignore it all and make up his own "laws" (sign of a lunitic who wants to be a dictator). He'll be lucky to not be thrown in jail at some point after leaving office.

https://www.politifact.com/punditfa...trump-be-indicted-after-leaving-office-muell/

 

[Timeless]

I'm sure he was quite intelligent when he was younger, however, he is very obviously dumb or at the very least senile. The man's lucky he has a cult of ignorance that supports him no matter what. I don't know what's worse his gullible supporters or his lack of common sense and reading comprehension.

Failures? Find someone else who's bankrupted that many businesses or had that many failures and tell me they too aren't unethical or corrupt. I'm going to guess the list is very short and it involves people who are in prison, don't be so naive.

The man was born rich, it is incredibly hard to take inherited fame and fortune and squander it all. This is how 60% of the wealthiest people in the world got their money. Literally go research this.

Rigged election? For who? Lmao!

I don't hate the man him, I just don't agree on a lot of his politics but don't get me wrong there are many I do agree with. Monday morning quarterback? You're literally doing negative research here, just spewing your opinions, get out of here with your close-mindedness. Trump could be like Boris Johnson and just play into the 'I'm dumb' sort of personality but I doubt it. Looking back on Trump's interviews in the 80s and 90s he was very clever and cunning, however now he quite possibly the dumbest smart guy on the international stage which makes us as Americans look equally dumb.

So basically you have nothing to refute his intellect, you refuse to acknowledge that Hillarity had the DNC side totally rigged in her direction (Ask Bernie and Donna Brazile), you think that every other billionaire never had any failures except Trump, refuse to acknowledge his taking a million and making it billions, and say that 63+ million voting Americans are gullible supporters just because they disagree with you.

So the real question then is why aren't YOU a billionaire President of America? It is obvious you are far superior.

And in the New Years' spirit, I believe we have exhausted any chance of real discussion. I suggest we agree to disagree and start out this New Year wishing well for everyone.

#KAG

 

[Weather Man]

Mean while, the D stench of corruption they are trying to cover up with impeachment continues to ooze out. Apparently the going price for access to a D presidential candidate that may win is around 150-200 million dollars. We still don't know how much of the Chinese 1.5 billion was skimmed off yet. Would anyone be surprised if was around the 200 million mark?

 

[watisthis]

So basically you have nothing to refute his intellect, you refuse to acknowledge that Hillarity had the DNC side totally rigged in her direction (Ask Bernie and Donna Brazile), you think that every other billionaire never had any failures except Trump, refuse to acknowledge his taking a million and making it billions, and say that 63+ million voting Americans are gullible supporters just because they disagree with you.

So the real question then is why aren't YOU a billionaire President of America? It is obvious you are far superior.

And in the New Years' spirit, I believe we have exhausted any chance of real discussion. I suggest we agree to disagree and start out this New Year wishing well for everyone.

#KAG

I can not 100% refute it as intelligence is relative and subjective. However, anyone who thinks the man is of sound mind and isn't a con man is only fooling themselves. How this man has done this for 50+ years is beyond me, people really are this gullible, it's no wonder scams, MLM, phishing and the like are some of the easiest ways to make money.

Yes, Hillary and the DNC did rig the democratic nomination. I'm not debating this so why even bring it up.

Trump is a huge business outlier I'm still waiting for you to prove otherwise, try not to change the subject. The man took many millions, loans, bankruptcies; and the like. It isn't hard to be born with a silver spoon and come out with more when you're corrupt and unethical, many have done this same thing. You obviously have done zero research into his dealings with the mafia, Russian oligarchs, and tax avoidance.

Of course, not all 63 million are gullible, however, I could easily say half of them are. Just as I'm sure half of the people voting for Democrats are. This isn't singular to one party, plenty of people do not do their research and believe what they're told.

I've done very well for myself, I don't need to brag about what I've made in the market. Nor did Einstein, or Sidis but apparently we gatekeep intelligence behind money and power I'm sure Kim Jong-un is a very stable genius too, lmao.

Happy New Year to you as well.

 

[watisthis]

Mean while, the D stench of corruption they are trying to cover up with impeachment continues to ooze out. Apparently the going price for access to a D presidential candidate that may win is around 150-200 million dollars. We still don't know how much of the Chinese 1.5 billion was skimmed off yet. Would anyone be surprised if was around the 200 million mark?

Biden and Buttigieg are both incredibly slimy. They are both terrible looks for the Democratic party and do a disservice for everyone else running.

 

[Weather Man]

 

[Weather Man]

 

[Bikeman315]

Old news. This was brought up last year before she was elected.
https://www.miamiherald.com/news/politics-government/article214974800.html
Meaningless in regards to this topic.

 

[Weather Man]

Old news. This was brought up last year before she was elected.
https://www.miamiherald.com/news/politics-government/article214974800.html
Meaningless in regards to this topic.

It wasn't meaningless to her vote, oligarch's expect return on investment.

 

[Bikeman315]

It wasn't meaningless to her vote, oligarch's expect return on investment.

Please show me any facts supporting this position. You’re adding 1+1 and coming up with 3. By the way for every story like this brought from the right against a Democrat there is a story about a Republican from the left. I do not believe either of them

Sponsored