Sponsored

WARNING! Apex Headstud Failures!

OP
OP
tdstuart

tdstuart

Well-Known Member
Joined
Apr 6, 2021
Threads
72
Messages
2,562
Reaction score
1,290
Location
Arizona
First Name
Triston
Vehicle(s)
2015 Mustang Gt Premium


Another potential apex stud failure on a fresh gen3 bottom end and not crazy boost. I don’t even think it made 800
They seem like they were sponsored or at least reached out heavily to apex.
They have an assembly video here:
At 7:57 they start talking about the headstuds and they mention how they talked to Travis and that the low torque is a good thing and its way more pressure than factory bolts, etc.

I am wondering how their update video is going to go down. I am trying to reach out to them so they don't make a video to keep peddling them and switch to arp. I don't want them to make a video saying "We must have done something wrong, or maybe there was a defect, it happens, we are just going to get some new ones, thank you Travis for being so supportive". I want a video calling the company out lmao.
Sponsored

 
OP
OP
tdstuart

tdstuart

Well-Known Member
Joined
Apr 6, 2021
Threads
72
Messages
2,562
Reaction score
1,290
Location
Arizona
First Name
Triston
Vehicle(s)
2015 Mustang Gt Premium

HKusp

Well-Known Member
Joined
Jul 22, 2021
Threads
37
Messages
2,228
Reaction score
2,891
Location
Hampton, Md.
First Name
Jason
Vehicle(s)
2018 Mustang GT
For future reference ARP calls for a torque sequence of 40, 80, and finally 125ft/lbs with their lubricant on the threads and bottoms of the nuts.

PDF Click Here
 

SolarFlare

Well-Known Member
Joined
Aug 24, 2015
Threads
76
Messages
4,145
Reaction score
2,403
Location
S. Fla
Vehicle(s)
2015 CO GT
OP
OP
tdstuart

tdstuart

Well-Known Member
Joined
Apr 6, 2021
Threads
72
Messages
2,562
Reaction score
1,290
Location
Arizona
First Name
Triston
Vehicle(s)
2015 Mustang Gt Premium
DAMN. I sure hope he puts away the youtuber personality and calls it like it is too.
That’s my hope. He said he was in talks with Travis and that he will not be using apex again. Hopefully he actually calls them out and even more hopefully Travis admits there is an issue and recalls these damn things.
 

Sponsored

HKusp

Well-Known Member
Joined
Jul 22, 2021
Threads
37
Messages
2,228
Reaction score
2,891
Location
Hampton, Md.
First Name
Jason
Vehicle(s)
2018 Mustang GT
What is Travis' last name?
 

HKusp

Well-Known Member
Joined
Jul 22, 2021
Threads
37
Messages
2,228
Reaction score
2,891
Location
Hampton, Md.
First Name
Jason
Vehicle(s)
2018 Mustang GT

Epiphany

Well-Known Member
Joined
Oct 11, 2015
Threads
74
Messages
7,951
Reaction score
13,531
Location
Global
Vehicle(s)
I like to disassemble things.
When it comes to critical engine fasteners, you always want the highest quality available. For me, based on my own experience, I would stick to ARP due to the limited/non-existent number of failures along with their consistency in terms of quality of the product itself as well as the engineering behind it. The alloy used, heat treat, and installation instructions are something that should first and foremost in the mind of the end user. That said...

Apex Torque Specs:
Step 1: 74 lb/ft
Step 2: 92 lb/ft

ARP Torque Specs:
Step 1: 40 lb/ft
Step 2: 80 lb/ft
Step 3: 125 lb/ft
Purely based on torque figures, the number of steps is interesting as is the deviation between final torque figures from the two companies. Thirty three lb/feet is significant. That would having me look closer at the alloys used and whether or not the nuts and stud threads are lubricated or dry.

ARP uses lube on the contacting washer and nut surface, as well as the nut threads.
Apex only uses lube on the contacting washer and nut surface.
GIANT red flag here. Using ARP thread lubricant on the ARP stud/nut threads (125 lb/ft) versus the Apex stud/nut threads (92 lb/ft) being dry...the ARP studs have the potential for a much higher clamp load than the Apex - of related importance is alloy and heat treat.

I highly recommend using ARP's thread lubricant as they do on their own studs. Preload is consistent, extremely important with multi stage torque sequences. Apex's dry recommendation is potentially (and likely) inconsistent due to friction at the nut/stud thread interface.

The Apex failures look to be rather consistent, where the shank meets the first thread. Based on some of the images shown, I'd be wondering about hydrogen embrittlement. Again, knowing the alloy used is critical. Hard to tell from the wording used on their site but are the Apex stud threads rolled or cut? They should be nothing less than rolled.

Stick with ARP.

ON EDIT...

To be clear, fasteners (as in this case, studs) need to stretch. That elasticity is what allows them to do their job. The issue is yield or when a given stud becomes "plastic" or permanently deformed. Measuring stretch is the most accurate way to properly install critical engine fasteners but it isn't the easiest, hence the torque wrench. Well designed fasteners can be stretched almost an infinite number of cycles as long as they do not exceed limitations. Not enough preload can be a stud killer too as that can encourage fatigue (and then failure).
 
Last edited:

Sponsored

Epiphany

Well-Known Member
Joined
Oct 11, 2015
Threads
74
Messages
7,951
Reaction score
13,531
Location
Global
Vehicle(s)
I like to disassemble things.
To be fair, there are plenty of quality fastener manufacturers out there. When it comes to the domestic engine fastener performance aftermarket, the number of companies out there dwindles down to only a few in short order. ARP leads the class here without question.

Trying to find the actual alloy Apex is using - frustrating.
https://apextorque.com/at280/

Apex said:
We developed AT280 over 6 months of testing different alloys and heat treatments. Our journey led us past 4000 series steel like 4340 and 8000 series steel like 8740 because of insufficient strength and heat instability. Tensile test after tensile test had us tweaking our heat treatment by 20°F at a time to find the perfect blend of strength and durability. When we found peak performance, we started branding it as AT280.
You started branding what as AT280?
 
OP
OP
tdstuart

tdstuart

Well-Known Member
Joined
Apr 6, 2021
Threads
72
Messages
2,562
Reaction score
1,290
Location
Arizona
First Name
Triston
Vehicle(s)
2015 Mustang Gt Premium
i'm not hating, im seriously wondering this... why would anyone use anything but ARP?
Atleast for me, at the time arp was on backorder and wouldn’t have any for months. Beefcake recommended apex as a solid option that would have some in stock in a few weeks. So for me it was that they would be available so much sooner and that a big company recommended them.
 

Oakley

Well-Known Member
Joined
Nov 10, 2022
Threads
25
Messages
1,309
Reaction score
1,756
Location
Texas
First Name
Lee
Vehicle(s)
2022 Mustang
Atleast for me, at the time arp was on backorder and wouldn’t have any for months. Beefcake recommended apex as a solid option that would have some in stock in a few weeks. So for me it was that they would be available so much sooner and that a big company recommended them.
dang. was too much power for the stock stuff the problem being solved?
 
OP
OP
tdstuart

tdstuart

Well-Known Member
Joined
Apr 6, 2021
Threads
72
Messages
2,562
Reaction score
1,290
Location
Arizona
First Name
Triston
Vehicle(s)
2015 Mustang Gt Premium
dang. was too much power for the stock stuff the problem being solved?
No I used a gen3 shortblock with gen2 heads so you need to use a headstud as none of the head bolts will work
 
OP
OP
tdstuart

tdstuart

Well-Known Member
Joined
Apr 6, 2021
Threads
72
Messages
2,562
Reaction score
1,290
Location
Arizona
First Name
Triston
Vehicle(s)
2015 Mustang Gt Premium
Is he the same guy from Boundary oil pump gears?
Pretty sure which sucks since I use boundary oil pumps… might switch to another company in the future
Sponsored

 
 








Top