Burkey
Well-Known Member
You forgot one critical component. Some of those countries don’t allow former bankrupts to hold any position in politics. Ergo, the current president wouldn’t even be eligible.Our vehement insistence on the right to bear arms is founded on a historical distrust of government, which was instilled in our nation at birth. We also have a painful history of that same government that we are conditioned to distrust suppressing our citizens' right to vote. Our distrust may or may not be logical, but its origins are understandable.
Rejecting a requirement to possess a government ID is a manifestation of that same mistrust of the government and seen as an infringement upon our freedom. To possess a government ID you have to register personal details with the government. Consider that the requiring SSNs is a relatively recent development for that same reason. It was not that long ago that you only needed an SSN if you had a job; it's about taxes.
As for what other countries do, it's curious that we use those who require IDs as an example. Most of the same countries severely restrict gun ownership, require all adults to vote, have an income tax rate of about 48%, VAT of at least 19%, national education requirements, nationally mandated COVID mask policies, dog tax, tv tax, nationally managed health care... But they are right about their voter ID requirement?
Crazy stuff. Imagine not allowing someone who can’t manage their own funds properly, to have access to to the wealth of a nation.
Sponsored
