The solution to voting

[lonegunman]

Oh yeah, ID should be required to vote, still. Haven't changed my mind. Even if the voting machine is powered by a wind turbine and made from recycled Amazon boxes.

Did you know synthetic oil.............................is made from petroleum products? Damn those oil companies.

Sponsored

 

[Burkey]

The real mystery is why you idiots think people were responsible for the events of the previous 3,998,000,000 years of the planets existence?

Nobody who understands the topic thinks we were...
What is your point here?

 

[Caballus]

If tomorrow the NAZI party supported Black Lives Matter, then they would be acceptable to you, correct? As long as they change their beliefs we can still call them NAZI's and they can still fly their NAZI banners and flags, just like Democrats.

Nobody switched, trust me you are still a racist. You are still intolerant. You are hateful, spiteful and nasty. You are still a complete moron.

After the Civil War, Robert E. Lee went back to serving America, if your idiotic theory holds true, there is no reason to remove his statues. He did such a good job saving a University, they added his name to it. Therefore, Robert E. Lee should be a acceptable to you. So should Nathan Bedford Forrest, he denounced the KKK later in life and worked to integrate the south before he died, no reason to remove his name from anything, if your theory is true. They should be celebrated by the DNC.

The one true mystery in all this is why a retard like you thinks he has an IQ over 70? A participation trophy does not mean you won, and a "diploma" for attending 50% of your high school classes does not mean you are smart, stop listening to your mommy. Whip out some more of that "D" average intelligence bro, I can take it.

Robert E. Lee advised the nation not to build monuments commemorating the Civil War. Consider the image the monuments in question project--images of Civil War leaders. They do not depict them as reconcilers who sought either to maintain the Union, heal the nation, or imbue us with a greater respect for humankind. Neither was that aspect of their history taught in the North or South--Republican or Democratic districts. In the Democratic South they were idolized as confederate leaders. In the Republican North they were vilified as traitors and hate mongers. So, the version you cite is a relatively recent interpretation, and like its antecedent, has threads of revisionism. In Lee's case, for example, he did, indeed, advocate for peace by encouraging the South not to resume hostilities after Appomattox; enough blood had been shed in what remains America's bloodiest war. He did not, however, return to service. He became a university president and an avid segregationist.

Noting the NAZI reference, consider that many NAZI leaders who were not indicted for war crimes helped reconstruct the German army and create NATO. That differs from the de-Ba'athification policy we employed in Iraq, and we are still suffering for not consulting our history in that case. Nevertheless, no monuments were constructed to memorialize former NAZIs, regardless to their antebellum (or post-war) contributions. Nor are NAZI symbols allowed to be displayed or even owned to this day.

So, yes, we should study all dimensions of these men in context of American history. Every American should know them for their battlefield leadership, just as we know Rommel and Peiper for theirs. We learn as much from studying the battlefield exploits of our enemies as we do from studying our own experiences. Likewise, when it comes to post-war reconciliation policies. To do this effectively, we have to first remove the politics from the equation.

 

[watisthis]

Most idiots laugh out loud when confronted with their idiocy, no real surprise here.

Like everyone else, I too am forced to work with leftist idiots, every time someone disagrees with them the leftists always devolve into calling people "racists" or some such crap, even if they disagree about the best fish for dinner. News is only news if it comes from a communist party website or paper. Facts are only facts if spewed by an uninformed leftist talking head.

One of the work leftists melted down when the discussion was over the incredibly large number of birds killed by wind turbines. (sometimes as high as two large birds per hour, per turbine) We had a massive decade long study by several PHd's plotting the problem and identifying the birds most likely to die, etc. etc. etc. He was convinced was false because wind turbines are good for the environment,blah, blah, blah. One day, weeks later of course, he see's the same exact information in a communist magazine and brought it into work as if it he had an epiphany. Since Mother Jones said it was real...............................therefore he was now able to partially believe the science.

Now this is utterly unrelated to voting, but in a few minutes you are going to something totally stupid like house cats kill far more birds because that is what leftist dipshits have been instructed to compare it too. It will be impossible to make you understand the difference between killing large birds, like Golden Eagles, Hawks, California Condors, Bald Eagles and Trumpeter Swans and killing sparrows. So to the uninformed leftist idiot( who is laughing out loud like a moron) when a wind turbine kills a dozen Bald Eagles and there are only 9,300 nesting pairs in the lower 48, it is the EXACT same thing as a cat killing one of 10,000,000 sparrows in the lower 48.

Trust me you are a chicken nugget with eyes.

I laughed out loud. No amount of you reading and explaining the article to you will change your mind.

Here are more problems with the delusional fantasy of that article. Photocopying ballots doesn't work when ballots use special paper, watermarks, or other security measures, especially if they're different combinations each election. Insiders throwing away ballots doesn't work when voters can track the status of their ballot, see if it's been received, and files a complaint if it's not. The more people involved in a conspiracy, i.e. insiders in the post office, the harder it is to keep quiet.

And best yet, anonymous sources for we, not for thee. Outright lies unless its pro-con, then its gospel. ROFL

Moreover,

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/New_York_Post

"The Post has been criticized since the beginning of Murdoch's ownership for sensationalism, blatant advocacy, and conservative bias. In 1980, the Columbia Journalism Review stated "New York Post is no longer merely a journalistic problem. It is a social problem – a force for evil."[52]

The Post has been accused of contorting its news coverage to suit Murdoch's business needs, in particular avoiding subjects which could be unflattering to the government of the People's Republic of China, where Murdoch has invested heavily in satellite television.[53]"


Lastly, you can't even comprehend the Southern Strategy, or the idea of southern democrats aka Dixiecrats, a group of people from 50+ years ago, had an association with the KKK, but they literally came out in support of Donald Trump and the GOP. This is literally like saying that Alabama is currently an apartheid state, just because Jim Crow was around 50+ years ago there.

Republicans: 'Democrats were the slave owners, they started the KKK!'
Democrats: 'Ok, let's take down the confederate statues and quit waving the confederate flag, its a symbol of slavery, racism, hate and the KKK'.
Republicans: 'Leave our history and heritage alone! REEEE!'

Republicans love to pretend the Goldwater flip in the 60s never happened.

 

[Gregs24]

Nor are NAZI symbols allowed to be displayed or even owned to this day.

Extreme RIGHT wing organisations in Germany today have caused outrage displaying swastikas and the former imperial German flag as well as attempting to storm the Reichstag on the back of nutty anti vax and conspiracy theorists.

 

[Caballus]

Extreme RIGHT wing organisations in Germany today have caused outrage displaying swastikas and the former imperial German flag as well as attempting to storm the Reichstag on the back of nutty anti vax and conspiracy theorists.

Displaying swastikas is illegal.

 

[Gregs24]

Displaying swastikas is illegal.

Indeed.

Sponsored