Iâd be utterly surprised if they werenât trying to make them cheaper. Good lord. Who wants to pay more for a vehicle than they really have to, regardless of the motive power source.
Or, was it because there wasnât a 7 seat 4x4 available in Australia at a price point that was even vaguely realistic? Pretty sure we covered this several times. Pay attention.
A genuine hypocrite would refuse to buy an EV after the mandates (that they support) have come into effect. I know...
Lol. Tell me more about what I think. Or, you could ask me if I think these vehicles are emissions free⊠Iâd take the time to explain that I donât think that at all.
Ever get tired of failing?
Nobody = an increasing number of people.
Emissions free = reduced emissions.
Any other terms I need to...
NobodyâŠliterally nobodyâŠexcept for the ever increasing number of people who actually do want one. But yes, âNOBODYâ.
âSince Q3 2021, EV sales have increased every quarter, and the share of total light-duty vehicle sales that EVs represent isn't shrinking, either. The share of new sales that are...
The US, like most countries, should probably aim to reduce reliance on other countries as much as possible. Itâs hardly Chinas fault that nobody bothered to try and keep pace with them.
We didnât blame the Japanese for leading the way in electronics for decades.
The answer is to keep up with them, or at least try. Yes, it requires investment, obviously. More jobs. Better paying jobs.
There is no future in continuing to spew CO2 into the atmosphere at the current rate. This is where future wars might be created.
Even California will allow the sale of...
Isnât resource investment and technology development the whole point? Why blame a nation for doing the thing that theyâre meant to be doing?
Seems weird.
People used to get upset at the Chinese for producing copies. Now theyâre innovating, and people are mad.
Canât win?
How high do you have to be to believe this?
Just think, there are people out there who actually fall for this crap. I wonder what other lies they believe?
Your failure to recall or otherwise be aware of something, isnât evidence that it didnât exist.
This information is easily found if you actually went looking for it, but instead, youâve decided your conclusion and search for information that seemingly confirms what you already believe...
If you vaccinate 100% of a population, 100% of the people suffering from myocarditis will be vaccinated. Itâs pretty simple to work this out.
However, if you donât vaccinate ANY of the people, youâll have more than 5 times as many people suffering from myocarditis.
You're looking at the numbers...
Thatâs fine, but youâre failing to recognise that COVID is the leading cause of myocarditis, not the vaccines.
So yes, the numbers are up,, but not for the reasons youâve decided.
Perhaps we should return to an age where people actually listened to the medical profession and bet their information from respected sources, rather than whatever BS the algorithms throw at you via FB, Twitter etc etc.
âWe identified 22 eligible studies consisting of 55.5 million vaccinated...
Should I have instead taken the time to dispel all of the misinformation he shared so that he (and likely you also) could ignore it again?
Now THAT would be stupid.
Some people are impervious to learning.
The rest of us have learned not to waste our time.
Sounds a lot like that guy who tried to convince everyone that he had a great vocabulary, without using the word vocabularyâŠâŠ.. but a lot of words. Almost as if he lacked the vocabulary to describe a vocabulary.
Charts?
Reading?
Pfffft