I get the feeling it was watered down so enthusiasts wouldn't freak out... If it had come out looking more modern than an Evos, or super car-ish, Mustang fans would have flipped their lids even more so than we're seeing now. I think they tried to reel the designs back in to maintain some Mustang "muscle" look... I feel like what actually held the car back was the Mustang community. And I don't think that's necessarily a bad thing. Passionate, dedicated fans are something every car company dreams of.The DNA is in there, but it's watered down further than enthusiasts like us would like. They had some exciting GR-1 influenced sketches, but ended up playing it safer.
Clues to the '17MY refresh ;)The DNA is in there, but it's watered down further than enthusiasts like us would like. They had some exciting GR-1 influenced sketches, but ended up playing it safer.
I love it! It's dangerous to fall in love with those sketches. They were never meant to be production worthy. But they are sexy!The DNA is in there, but it's watered down further than enthusiasts like us would like. They had some exciting GR-1 influenced sketches, but ended up playing it safer.
Too big and heavy - was hoping the downsizing rumours were true. The fact that Ford won't release the weight makes it obvious that they failed to cut the fat. Even the new version of the Vette which unlike the new Stang made extensive use of lightweight materials wound up being heavier - it's inevitable if you "feature bloat" without downsizing.
yep. And if a Ford would have "significantly" cut weight, people would then complain about the MSRP increase that would have come with the car by doing so.Expecting it to lose significant weight in every variant was wishful thinking to begin with in my opinion. My guess is the EB4 will be the "light" model out of the three.
The new Vette was heavier because they added features and improvements, which it was sorely lacking. The Vette was trashed year in and year out for a poor interior with cheap materials, few creature comforts, rattles, and poor isolation. People were rightly finding this unacceptable on a 50-60K vehicle. So Chevy vastly upgraded the materials and offset the weight gain from the new features with lightweight materials.
The result was a car that performs better than its predecessor in nearly every way and also has a modern, upscale interior all while keeping the price close to the same as the outgoing model.
I guess the point is that there are tradeoffs. People want light but also want a nice interior full of features. People want light but want a big V8 under the hood. And being light costs more money.
This car will perform fine.