Sponsored

Factory Piston Pin height

Oakley

Well-Known Member
Joined
Nov 10, 2022
Threads
25
Messages
1,309
Reaction score
1,756
Location
Texas
First Name
Lee
Vehicle(s)
2022 Mustang
i don't have the measurements but it should definitely be below the head and valves.

if its above those you got a real problem.
 

tdstuart

Well-Known Member
Joined
Apr 6, 2021
Threads
72
Messages
2,564
Reaction score
1,292
Location
Arizona
First Name
Triston
Vehicle(s)
2015 Mustang Gt Premium
If the point is to boost the motor, is the 0.2L really worth the effort?

Take a look at FFRE where they keep the engine at 5.0L to have a stronger cylinder wall, they just chuck in a ton of boost haha. Their 5.0L on bretts car has gone low 6s 1/4 mile. I think they are turning 9k+ maybe even over 10k rpm.

For an engine making a lot less than 2000+hp it would probably be just fine to have the cylinder walls thinner to get the 5.2L. Just not sure if it's worth it to increase the stroke to get another .2L when you could just add a little more boost.

This setup: https://rpgracingengines.com/product/rpg-max-effort-n-a-5-5l-short-block/
Would be a sick N/A motor.
 
OP
OP
Decible

Decible

Well-Known Member
Joined
Dec 27, 2020
Threads
52
Messages
932
Reaction score
500
Location
Georgia
First Name
Sam
Vehicle(s)
2023 Mach 1 HP
If the point is to boost the motor, is the 0.2L really worth the effort?

Take a look at FFRE where they keep the engine at 5.0L to have a stronger cylinder wall, they just chuck in a ton of boost haha. Their 5.0L on bretts car has gone low 6s 1/4 mile. I think they are turning 9k+ maybe even over 10k rpm.

For an engine making a lot less than 2000+hp it would probably be just fine to have the cylinder walls thinner to get the 5.2L. Just not sure if it's worth it to increase the stroke to get another .2L when you could just add a little more boost.

This setup: https://rpgracingengines.com/product/rpg-max-effort-n-a-5-5l-short-block/
Would be a sick N/A motor.
It would actually be a bit over .4 total and on the low end side it probably would be worth it. Not using a factory block, I’ll be using the Bear Block.
 

Sponsored

OP
OP
Decible

Decible

Well-Known Member
Joined
Dec 27, 2020
Threads
52
Messages
932
Reaction score
500
Location
Georgia
First Name
Sam
Vehicle(s)
2023 Mach 1 HP
If the point is to boost the motor, is the 0.2L really worth the effort?

Take a look at FFRE where they keep the engine at 5.0L to have a stronger cylinder wall, they just chuck in a ton of boost haha. Their 5.0L on bretts car has gone low 6s 1/4 mile. I think they are turning 9k+ maybe even over 10k rpm.

For an engine making a lot less than 2000+hp it would probably be just fine to have the cylinder walls thinner to get the 5.2L. Just not sure if it's worth it to increase the stroke to get another .2L when you could just add a little more boost.

This setup: https://rpgracingengines.com/product/rpg-max-effort-n-a-5-5l-short-block/
Would be a sick N/A motor.
The compression is way to high for what I’d use it for but I bet at 14:1 that thing make 670+ to the wheels. We did a 13.1 sbc 377 back in the 90’s and that thing made over 700
 

tdstuart

Well-Known Member
Joined
Apr 6, 2021
Threads
72
Messages
2,564
Reaction score
1,292
Location
Arizona
First Name
Triston
Vehicle(s)
2015 Mustang Gt Premium
The compression is way to high for what I’d use it for but I bet at 14:1 that thing make 670+ to the wheels. We did a 13.1 sbc 377 back in the 90’s and that thing made over 700
Ya they say it can do over 700whp with the right heads, cams, intake, etc.

Way too high compression for boost though.
 

tdstuart

Well-Known Member
Joined
Apr 6, 2021
Threads
72
Messages
2,564
Reaction score
1,292
Location
Arizona
First Name
Triston
Vehicle(s)
2015 Mustang Gt Premium
It would actually be a bit over .4 total and on the low end side it probably would be worth it. Not using a factory block, I’ll be using the Bear Block.
So would it be 5.4 or 5.6 (5.2 block + 0.4 stroke) total?
 
OP
OP
Decible

Decible

Well-Known Member
Joined
Dec 27, 2020
Threads
52
Messages
932
Reaction score
500
Location
Georgia
First Name
Sam
Vehicle(s)
2023 Mach 1 HP
So would it be 5.4 or 5.6 (5.2 block + 0.4 stroke) total?
So the 5.2 and 5.0 use the same 3.65 stroke. The only difference is the bore. The 5.2 has a 3.7 bore and the 5.0 has a 3.6x bore. 3.7 is a max bore on these blocks due to the bore spacing. That’s why the only way to gains and cubes is to increase the stroke. That motor uses a 3.9 stroke with a 5.85 rode with a 3.7 bore to get to 5.5L or 335 CI. I don’t like the idea of having the piston above the deck and having to run an extra thick head gasket with boost. I’d rather lose 4 cid and keep the piston slightly below the deck and make it up with boost 🤷🏼‍♂️ so to answer your question it would be going from a 5.0 to a 5.43 or 331 CI with a 3.7 bore and 3.84 stroke. So a total increase of .43 CI for an extra 25 CI with much more low end torque due to the stroke. A Centri would love this motor.
 

Sponsored

tdstuart

Well-Known Member
Joined
Apr 6, 2021
Threads
72
Messages
2,564
Reaction score
1,292
Location
Arizona
First Name
Triston
Vehicle(s)
2015 Mustang Gt Premium
I fantasized about 5.4 badges on the fenders….
I looked into doing a stroker when first building my motor and had this same thought. Couldn't find any though haha would need to get some custom made
 

K4fxd

Well-Known Member
Joined
Apr 2, 2020
Threads
121
Messages
13,455
Reaction score
12,262
Location
NKY
First Name
Dan
Vehicle(s)
2017 gt, 2002 FXDWG, 2008 C6,
Y'all are worried about piston speed rod ratio ect..... I'm just going to throw this out there. We were building 4-5/8ths inch stroke twin cam HD's for YEARS. Spinning the max effort one's to 7500-8000 RPM

The pistons, pins and rods are beyond good.
Sponsored

 
 








Top