Right on Mike.Piston velocity at tdc is 0! Acceleration is quite high though…
No we were running these in production bikes. No room to lengthen the cylinders. So shorter than stock rods.…the conrod is 8”!
At 74* the 5.2 hits 8034 at the same rpm (8000) the 5.4 hits 8467….st 7800 rpm 8200. It’s not terrible….Just for fun or serious.
https://lmengines.com/pages/piston-velocity-calculator
So are we talking 7.xx”No we were running these in production bikes. No room to lengthen the cylinders. So shorter than stock rods.
That’s still a good rod ratio. In modern times the idea of 1.8 has been pushed aside due to material science and it’s been proven in most cases a 1.6ish ratio makes better torque. This combo and an LS7 are in the 1.5x range which is really on the edge of my comfort zone.
Yes, but piston speed is off the charts. All my engine programs say not to spin higher than 6000. These live in the 8000 range. Piston tech has come a long way.That’s still a good rod ratio.
The days of Smokey’s “Use the longest damn rod as possible” have changed a lot.That’s still a good rod ratio. In modern times the idea of 1.8 has been pushed aside due to material science and it’s been proven in most cases a 1.6ish ratio makes better torque. This combo and an LS7 are in the 1.5x range which is really on the edge of my comfort zone.
This is very true! 496 bbc by all accounts has a horrible rod ratio (1.37) but we spin them to 6800k and 7xx hp in big compression (14.1 to 15.1) race trim back in the dayThe days of Smokey’s “Use the longest damn rod as possible” have changed a lot.