Sponsored

Exhaust Pressure Testing

Mach9310

Well-Known Member
Joined
Nov 13, 2019
Threads
33
Messages
154
Reaction score
50
Location
Miami, Florida
First Name
Mario
Vehicle(s)
2019 Mustang GT A10
@TEXAS HEAT at one point I just increased the 2.25” factory connect to 2.5” and saw a measurable reduction in backpressure.

@TEXAS HEAT and @Mach9310 i found that 2.5” jist isn’t big enough to support a forced induction coyote. If the goal is to be under 5 psi backpressure, as recommended by Vizard years ago and substantiated by my own testing, I found it’s going to take a true dual 3” or bigger front to back.
Thanks for the response. I’m going to give it a shot. Catless headers into the borla resonator into 3” turndowns. Hopefully it’s not too loud and it helps me get into the low 4s 60-130 while still running a 6 rib setup.
Sponsored

 

TEXAS HEAT

Well-Known Member
Joined
May 25, 2016
Threads
37
Messages
706
Reaction score
281
Location
TEXAS
Vehicle(s)
2019 Mustang GT PP1 A10

TEXAS HEAT

Well-Known Member
Joined
May 25, 2016
Threads
37
Messages
706
Reaction score
281
Location
TEXAS
Vehicle(s)
2019 Mustang GT PP1 A10
@TEXAS HEAT at one point I just increased the 2.25” factory connect to 2.5” and saw a measurable reduction in backpressure.

@TEXAS HEAT and @Mach9310 i found that 2.5” jist isn’t big enough to support a forced induction coyote. If the goal is to be under 5 psi backpressure, as recommended by Vizard years ago and substantiated by my own testing, I found it’s going to take a true dual 3” or bigger front to back.
Thank you @engineermike for your feedback. When you say measurable with the 2.5" versus the 2.25" how much of a reduction are we talking about? Obviously not under 5psi total reduction, but if maybe half of that would be worth it?
 

Sponsored

K4fxd

Well-Known Member
Joined
Apr 2, 2020
Threads
121
Messages
13,455
Reaction score
12,262
Location
NKY
First Name
Dan
Vehicle(s)
2017 gt, 2002 FXDWG, 2008 C6,
if you can tolerate the sound of true dual 90° crankshaft V8’s….. yuck !
I grew up with that sound, I like it.
 

K4fxd

Well-Known Member
Joined
Apr 2, 2020
Threads
121
Messages
13,455
Reaction score
12,262
Location
NKY
First Name
Dan
Vehicle(s)
2017 gt, 2002 FXDWG, 2008 C6,
I'd like a bit more info on the 4x3 eccentric, if you made it or bought it and how you hooked it to the cat.

Thanks
 

Sponsored

K4fxd

Well-Known Member
Joined
Apr 2, 2020
Threads
121
Messages
13,455
Reaction score
12,262
Location
NKY
First Name
Dan
Vehicle(s)
2017 gt, 2002 FXDWG, 2008 C6,
so cut the end cap of the cat off an d weld it on?

I've noticed the gen 2's are 2 1/4 from the cat to the hook up.
 

Exploded_Muffin

Well-Known Member
Joined
Mar 16, 2017
Threads
17
Messages
301
Reaction score
302
Location
Houston, Texas
Vehicle(s)
2021 GT500
Very informative thread, thanks @engineermike!

Currently making about 800 whp and my setup is:
1 7/8 catless headers (bottle resonators in place of cats) ➡ 2.25 factory connect ➡ magnaflow tru-x resonator ➡ custom 2.75 connecting pipes ➡ borla s-type mufflers

I had one of my welded rear O2 bungs blow out a couple months back during a pull and based off this thread I believe this was due to excessive pressure build up right before the factory connect neck-down (@engineermike, any thoughts on this?)

I purchased the stainless bros 3" straight through resonator to replace the magnaflow tru-x.
Had it welded to the headers but was way too loud and raspy. Quiet mode became worthless and I couldn't go over 3,000 rpm as it was loud even with light throttle in quiet mode.
Switched back to the the magnaflow tru-x's a few days later.
Will keep the 3" resonator anyway incase I can get it to work with a different exhaust system in future

Just a general FYI

20220417_091229.jpg
 

TEXAS HEAT

Well-Known Member
Joined
May 25, 2016
Threads
37
Messages
706
Reaction score
281
Location
TEXAS
Vehicle(s)
2019 Mustang GT PP1 A10
Currently making about 800 whp and my setup is:
1 7/8 catless headers (bottle resonators in place of cats) ➡ 2.25 factory connect ➡ magnaflow tru-x resonator ➡ custom 2.75 connecting pipes ➡ borla s-type mufflers

I had one of my welded rear O2 bungs blow out a couple months back during a pull and based off this thread I believe this was due to excessive pressure build up right before the factory connect neck-down (@engineermike, any thoughts on this?)

I purchased the stainless bros 3" straight through resonator to replace the magnaflow tru-x.
Had it welded to the headers but was way too loud and raspy. Quiet mode became worthless and I couldn't go over 3,000 rpm as it was loud even with light throttle in quiet mode.
Switched back to the the magnaflow tru-x's a few days later.
Will keep the 3" resonator anyway incase I can get it to work with a different exhaust system in future

Just a general FYI

Hey Muffin, check out the Borla S-type with the 2.5" 60661 resonator. It's actually a very civilized system even without the big restriction (cats) and because it is dual 3" (besides the resonator) it flows so much better than the previous Magnaflow resonated X. When I removed it to install the new exhaust the body of the resonated x was heat checked, so much so that you could see where the exhaust gases were merging from the outside of the shell. That tells me that it was a huge restriction and that it was generating a lot of heat once I added the SC. I had it on my car from when it was NA and it never looked like that before I added boost.

On a side note, how are you liking the return style fuel system and e85? I've been mixing 1 gallon of xylene to 10 gallons of 93 pump gas to act as an octane booster since it has been so hot here in H-town lately. It raises the octane to 95 and keeps me from experiencing positive knock with the 115mm pulley and 100° charge temps.

20220417_091229.jpg

[/QUOTE]
 

TEXAS HEAT

Well-Known Member
Joined
May 25, 2016
Threads
37
Messages
706
Reaction score
281
Location
TEXAS
Vehicle(s)
2019 Mustang GT PP1 A10
@TEXAS HEAT at one point I just increased the 2.25” factory connect to 2.5” and saw a measurable reduction in backpressure.

@TEXAS HEAT and @Mach9310 i found that 2.5” jist isn’t big enough to support a forced induction coyote. If the goal is to be under 5 psi backpressure, as recommended by Vizard years ago and substantiated by my own testing, I found it’s going to take a true dual 3” or bigger front to back.
How much of that restriction are the cats though? I'm FFE, so I'm hoping that I'm a little closer to being under the 5psi back pressure once I get rid of the 2.25" restriction.
Sponsored

 
 








Top