Fly2High
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Sep 9, 2019
- Threads
- 78
- Messages
- 1,191
- Reaction score
- 615
- Location
- Long Island
- First Name
- Frank
- Vehicle(s)
- 2019 Mustang GT PP2
- Thread starter
- #61
Everyone needs both sides of the conversation to make a personal decision.
Questions I would like to be answered by a pro electric are:
1. electric/ tree huggers people are not pushing for everyone to stop buying SUVs/Trucks and go for a less drag, lighter car. This would also reduce emissions today. Why are they still buying them and why haven't they attacked those vehicles? Could you imagine if today's engineering was in cars of the 80's and 90's? I think oil companies would have something to say about that.
2. Instead of pushing for Congestion pricing, reduce the price of a train ticket from the suburbs to that of a city subway. So cheap that it would be financially stupid to drive in. Wouldn't this help those lesser income groups? How's about doing away with overtime in gov't jobs and instead higher enough people to cover the hours required. Paying someone a regular wage is far cheaper than paying time and a half. Might reduce the need for congestion pricing.
3. You promote urbanization so everyone walks? What about the impact of all that concrete you will be pouring? Last I heard, green grass and trees help the environment. How will you get to the great outdoors? Will we need trains to take you to mountain hiking/biking trails and all the great outdoor spots? If there are fewer cars, won't the price to operate one to get to your destination go up, not down making the outdoors for the rich only (sounds like Robert Moses).
4. What do you do if you get everyone to stay put? How will they get to work and spend money in other places? I would expect fewer to travel and what will that do to places that live for tourism.
5. Why aren't they pushing for work from home? 39% worked from home over the pandemic and the environment did show a change. Give companies an incentive to allow more work form home except that would hurt the urban economy and negatively impact the desire for urbanization and a less driving culture?
Finally, even with Long Island traffic, I love to drive. Going anywhere is a pleasure. Why would I want to ride in dirty disgusting public transportation where a portion of the population would rather destroy than improve or maintain it. If we had trains and buses like those in Europe, ok not all are great, then that might help. With personal transportation, I get to go when I wish and in a degree of safety. It will take a lot to increase the availability of public transportation. Even now, NYC has you wait 15-20 mins between rides. Also, I do not see the number of cops and infrastructure to suggest that will ever get to a point where I would feel safe at all hours of the day.
When a see a pro-EV person that lives in the suburbs driving a gas guzzler with a sticker or lawn poster asking to save the planet, all I can think is hypocrite. If they are not willing to live by example, why should it fall on the rest of us?
Questions I would like to be answered by a pro electric are:
1. electric/ tree huggers people are not pushing for everyone to stop buying SUVs/Trucks and go for a less drag, lighter car. This would also reduce emissions today. Why are they still buying them and why haven't they attacked those vehicles? Could you imagine if today's engineering was in cars of the 80's and 90's? I think oil companies would have something to say about that.
2. Instead of pushing for Congestion pricing, reduce the price of a train ticket from the suburbs to that of a city subway. So cheap that it would be financially stupid to drive in. Wouldn't this help those lesser income groups? How's about doing away with overtime in gov't jobs and instead higher enough people to cover the hours required. Paying someone a regular wage is far cheaper than paying time and a half. Might reduce the need for congestion pricing.
3. You promote urbanization so everyone walks? What about the impact of all that concrete you will be pouring? Last I heard, green grass and trees help the environment. How will you get to the great outdoors? Will we need trains to take you to mountain hiking/biking trails and all the great outdoor spots? If there are fewer cars, won't the price to operate one to get to your destination go up, not down making the outdoors for the rich only (sounds like Robert Moses).
4. What do you do if you get everyone to stay put? How will they get to work and spend money in other places? I would expect fewer to travel and what will that do to places that live for tourism.
5. Why aren't they pushing for work from home? 39% worked from home over the pandemic and the environment did show a change. Give companies an incentive to allow more work form home except that would hurt the urban economy and negatively impact the desire for urbanization and a less driving culture?
Finally, even with Long Island traffic, I love to drive. Going anywhere is a pleasure. Why would I want to ride in dirty disgusting public transportation where a portion of the population would rather destroy than improve or maintain it. If we had trains and buses like those in Europe, ok not all are great, then that might help. With personal transportation, I get to go when I wish and in a degree of safety. It will take a lot to increase the availability of public transportation. Even now, NYC has you wait 15-20 mins between rides. Also, I do not see the number of cops and infrastructure to suggest that will ever get to a point where I would feel safe at all hours of the day.
When a see a pro-EV person that lives in the suburbs driving a gas guzzler with a sticker or lawn poster asking to save the planet, all I can think is hypocrite. If they are not willing to live by example, why should it fall on the rest of us?
Sponsored