Romeo719
GHOST
- Thread starter
- #1
So took the car out for it's first Dyno pulls with the Roush SuperCharger added and wondering what folks think about the results. I went to local shop who actually uses a DynoPack Dyno. This dyno is supposed to be better than the standard big wheel inertia driven system by being able to adapt to local area temp and elevation and a load brake system. For my first pull on the SC, I'm happy. All and all, very excited about the Roush Phase 2 kit, although I am wondering if a different dyno will show different results.
Car: 2016 Mustang GT w/ Performance Pack, Borla S-Type exhaust, suspension mods (FRPP, Steeda, SR, other...)
SuperCharger: Roush Performance Phase 2 Kit (727HP) w/ Roush 93oct Tune
Dyno: DynoPack Chassis Dynometer
Location: Colorado Springs, CO
Altitude: 6,035 above sea level
Miles: 2300 total / 440 on SC
Shop: Peak Performance (Colorado Springs, CO) - Neil
Dyno Results: Max Over 6 pulls (to the wheels)
Engine Power: 610rwhp @ 6700rpm / 720HP Crank
Engine Torque:605.61lbft @ 4747rpm
Again I am going to try a different (standard) dyno on a better day.
What are your thoughts?
Car: 2016 Mustang GT w/ Performance Pack, Borla S-Type exhaust, suspension mods (FRPP, Steeda, SR, other...)
SuperCharger: Roush Performance Phase 2 Kit (727HP) w/ Roush 93oct Tune
Dyno: DynoPack Chassis Dynometer
Location: Colorado Springs, CO
Altitude: 6,035 above sea level
Miles: 2300 total / 440 on SC
Shop: Peak Performance (Colorado Springs, CO) - Neil
Dyno Results: Max Over 6 pulls (to the wheels)
Engine Power: 610rwhp @ 6700rpm / 720HP Crank
Engine Torque:605.61lbft @ 4747rpm
Again I am going to try a different (standard) dyno on a better day.
What are your thoughts?
Sponsored